期刊文献+

动态系统模型验证的多元响应分析 被引量:3

Multivariate Responses Analysis for Model Validation of Dynamic Systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对模型验证中多元动态响应分析问题,提出了基于改进的响应误差评估(Enhanced Error Assessment of Response Time Histories,EEARTH)方法与层次分析(Analytic Hierarchy Process,AHP)法的多元响应分析方法.采用EEARTH方法并结合动态时间规整,分析了物理试验与仿真数据动态时间响应曲线上重要特征的差异,并转化为统一的0-100%的EEARTH评分.采用AHP并利用领域专家知识以确定3个EEARTH评分的重要程度,以及各响应量对最终AHP-EEARTH评分的影响权重,从而获得多元动态系统模型验证的整体评分.对某车型的驾驶员乘员侧约束系统的实例研究表明,该方法能有效实现复杂多元动态系统的模型验证. In order to analyze the multiple dynamic responses for model validation of multiple dynamic systems, this paper proposed the analysis method based on the enhanced error assessment of response time histories (EEARTH) and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The EEARTH method was used to calculate the characteristic errors of the multivariate dynamic time series. The errors had to be translated into scores between 0 and 100; because they had different value ranges. The AHP method was performed to determine the weights of the three EEARTH scores and the weight of each response on the overall AHP-EEARTH score according to the knowledge of experts. Moreover, the AHP-EEARTH score of a multiple dynamic system was computed. Furthermore, a driver side occupant restraint system mathematical dynamic model (MADYMO) model was used to demonstrate the validity of the proposed method for model validation of multivariate dynamic systems.
出处 《上海交通大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第2期191-195,共5页 Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University
基金 国家自然科学基金(51475288 51275293) 上海科委基础研究重点项目(11JC1406100 13111102800) 美国福特汽车研究院URP(University Research Program)资助
关键词 多元响应分析 模型验证 改进的响应误差评估方法 层次分析法 multivariate responses analysis model validation enhanced error assessment of response time histories (EEARTH) method analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1郑凯,胡洁,彭颖红,詹振飞,戚进.结合定性知识的定量贝叶斯模型外推方法[J].上海交通大学学报,2012,46(6):994-998. 被引量:2
  • 2Pope N D, Bailey C G. Quantitative comparison of FDS and parametric fire curves with post-flashover compartment fire test data [J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2006, 41(2).. 99-110.
  • 3Sendur P, Peng H, Stein J L, etal. A model accura- cy and validation algorithm[C // Proceedings of the ASME, Dynamics Systems and Control Division. New Orleans, USA: ASME, 2002: 573-583.
  • 4Gu L, Yang R J. Computer model validation in vehi- cle crash safety design[C] // Design Automation Con- ference. Chicago, USA: ASME, 2003.. 519-525.
  • 5Sprague M A, Geers T L. A spectral-element method for modeling cavitation in transient fluid-structure in- teraction [ J ]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2004, 60(15): 2467-2499.
  • 6Sarin H, Kokkolaras M, Hulbert G, et al. Compa- ring time histories for validation of simulation mod- els: Error measures, and metric[J]. Journal of Dy- namic Systems, Measurement and Control, 2010, 132 (6) : 061401-1-061401-10.
  • 7Jiang X, Yang R J, Barbat S, etal. Bayesian proba- bilistic PCA approach for model validation of dynamic systems[J]. SAE International Journal of Materials & Manufacturing, 2009, 2(1): 555-563.
  • 8Arkin E M, Chew L P, Huttenlocher D P, etal. An efficiently computable metric for comparing polygonal shapes[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1991,13(3): 209-216.
  • 9Satty T L. How to make a decision: The analytic hi- erarchy process[J]. European Journal of Operational Reasearch, 1990, 48(1): 9-26.
  • 10Zhan Z F, Fu Y, Yang R J, et al. An automatic model calibration method for occupant restraint sys- tems[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimiza- tion, 2011, 44(6): 815-822.

二级参考文献8

  • 1Jiang X, Mahadevan S. Bayesian inference method for model validation and confidence extrapolation [J], Journal of Applied Statistics, 2009, 36(6) : 659 677.
  • 2韩磊,吴树芳,王子贤.贝叶斯网络[J].电子知识与技术,2009,21(5):5867-5872.
  • 3Chang R, Stetter M, Brauer W. Quantitative inference by qualitative semantic knowledge mining with Bayes Jan model averaging[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowl- edge and Data Engineering, 2008, 20(12) : 1587-1600.
  • 4Jiang X, Mahadevan S. Bayesian validation assessment of multivariate computational models [J]. Journal ofApplied Statistics, 2008, 35(1): 49-65.
  • 5Metropolis N, Ulam S. The Monte Carlo method[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1949, 44(247): 335 341.
  • 6Fu Yan, Zhan Zhen fei, Yang Renjie. A study of model validation method for dynamic systems [C] // SAEPaper. USA: SAE, 2010:2010 01-0419.
  • 7Jiang X, Mahadevan S. Bayesian wavelet method for multivariate model assessraent of dynamical systm;qs [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2008, 319 (4 5 ) : 694 712.
  • 8Babuska I, Nobile F, Tempone R. Formulation of the static frame problem[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 197 (29 32) : 2496 2499.

共引文献1

同被引文献26

引证文献3

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部