期刊文献+

基于上转换发光技术的尿液中吗啡及甲基苯丙胺快速定量检测方法研究 被引量:12

Rapid Detection of MOP and MET in Urine Based on Up-converting Phosphor Technology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的利用上转换发光免疫层析技术(UPT-LF)建立一种尿液中吗啡(MOP)及甲基苯丙胺(MET)快速定量检测方法并对其进行系统评价。方法以上转换发光纳米颗粒(UCP-NPs)作为生物示踪物,竞争模式免疫层析作为检测平台,建立可对尿液中MOP及MET进行定量检测的UPT-LF,即MOP-UPT-LF、MET-UPT-LF。以MOP-UPT-LF为代表,评价UPT-LF对痕量毒品检测极限,通过系列浓度标准品测定,评价定量检测能力。根据常规检测阈值,调整MOP-UPT-LF及MET-UPT-LF检测敏感性及线性范围,并评价其定量检测能力。以LC-MS、GC-MS分别作为MOP、MET检测的金标准,以胶体金免疫层析作为对照,对执法现场收集尿样进行检测,确定UPT-LF定性检测性能。对系列浓度MOP模拟阳性样本同时进行LC-MS及MOP-UPT-LF定量检测,对系列浓度MET模拟阳性样本同时进行GC-MS及MET-UPT-LF定量检测,评价UPT-LF定量检测性能。结果在痕量检测条件下,MOP-UPT-LF敏感性可达1ng/m L,线性范围为1~5000ng/m L(r=-0.98172,P〈0.0005)。在常规检测条件下,MOP-UPT-LF敏感性为50ng/m L,线性范围调整为50~3000ng/m L(r=-0.98464,P〈0.0005);MET-UPT-LF敏感性为100ng/m L,线性范围为100~5000ng/m L(r=-0.99964,P〈0.0005)。就定性检测而言,MOP-UPT-LF及MET-UPT-LF均较优,灵敏度及特异度均为100%,与胶体金结果一致。就定量检测而言MOP-UPT-LF及MET-UPT-LF与定量确证方法LC-MS及GC-MS无显著差异。结论本研究建立MOP-UPT-LF、MET-UPT-LF方法,在满足快筛试剂快速简便的基础上,进一步实现了现场快速定量检测,为尿液中毒品的现场快速定量检测提供了技术保障。 Objective To develop and evaluate an up-converting phosphor technology based on lateral flow assay(UPTLF) for qualitative and quantitative detection of morphine(MOP) and methamphetamine(MET) in urine.Methods With upconverting phosphor nano-particles(UCP-NPs) as the biological tracer,two competitive mode-based LF strips,MOP-UPTLF and MET-UPT-LF were developed for quantitative detection of MOP and MET in urine.The comprehensive performances of MOP-UPT-LF and MET-UPT-LF were evaluated systematically.In order to explore the detection limit of UPT-LF for trace analysis,MOP-UPT-LF strips were used to test standard samples with series of concentrations,and then the detection limit and ability of quantitative detection were determined.According to the standard of detection threshold for MOP and MET,the quantitative detection performances(including detection sensitivity and linear range) of MOP-UPT-LF and MET-UPTLF were optimized and re-evaluated.For the evaluation of qualitative detection ability,the results of MOP-UPT-LF and METUPT-LF for on-site urine samples were compared with those of colloidal gold based LF(CG-LF),and LC-MS and GC-MS were used as the gold standard for the detection of MOP and MET,respectively.For the evaluation of quantitative detection ability,the results of MOP-UPT-LF and MET-UPT-LF for simulated positive urine samples were compared with those of LCMS and GC-MS,respectively.Results For trace analysis,the detection limit of MOP-UPT-LF could reach 1ng/m L with a linear range from 1ng/m L to 5000ng/m L(r =-0.98172,P 0.0005).For routine detection with the threshold of standard,the detection limit of MOP-UPT-LF was 50ng/m L with a linear range from 50ng/m L to 3000ng/m L(r =-0.98464,P 0.0005).The detection limit of MET-UPT-LF was 100ng/m L with a linear range from 100ng/m L to 5000ng/m L(r =-0.99964,P 0.0005).According to the detection of urine samples,the performance of qualitative and quantitative detection of MOP-UPTLF and MET-UPT-LF could meet the need of the on-site rapid detection of MOP and MET in urine.The qualitative detection results of MOP-UPT-LF and MET-UPT-LF for on-site urine samples were consistent with those of colloidal gold and no false-positive and false-negative results observed.The ROC area of MOP-UPT-LF and MET-UPT-LF reached 1.000±0.000(95%CI).For quantitative detection of simulated positive urine samples,the recovery rate was 77%~133% with the mean of 109% and CV of 21% for MOP-UPT-LF,for MET-UPT-LF the recovery rate was 80%~131% along with the mean of 112% and CV of 17%.After statistical analysis,there was no significant difference(P0.05) between MOP-UPT-LF/MET-UPTLF and LC-MS/GC-MS for quantitative detection of MOP and MET in urine.Conclusions With the novel optical nanoparticle(UCP-NPs),the traditional LF assay was integrated with biosensor based on automated analysis and two kinds of UPT-LF strip were developed to meet the need of on-site qualitative and quantitative detection of MOP and MET.With GCLF as the reference for qualitative detection and LC-MS/GC-MS for quantitative detection,the comprehensive performances(including detection limit,qualitative accuracy,and quantitative ability) were evaluated systematically.The good qualitative and quantitative detection performance of MOP-UPT-LF and MET-UPT-LF offers a new choice for on-site drug screening.
出处 《刑事技术》 2015年第1期28-34,共7页 Forensic Science and Technology
基金 重大传染病防治专项(No.2011ZX10004-001 2012ZX10004801-002-004 2012ZX10004801-004-015) "863"计划项目(No.2013AA032205) 自然科学基金项目(No.81000774)
关键词 法医毒物学 上转换发光技术 免疫层析 吗啡 甲基苯丙胺 快速定量检测 尿液 forensic toxicology up-converting phosphor technology lateral flow assay morphine methamphetamine rapid detection quantitative detection urine
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献76

  • 1王宏敏,杜文民,夏国美,金慧林,王晓瑜,徐建龙,王彤春,陈月芳.新型毒品的流行趋势调查分析[J].上海食品药品监管情报研究,2007(1):26-29. 被引量:10
  • 2贾燕,李宁,逯美红,孙金海,史艳宁,许晓宇,梁来顺,沈京玲.太赫兹光谱和成像技术在毒品识别和检测方面的应用[J].现代科学仪器,2006,23(2):41-44. 被引量:11
  • 3朱军,赵敬真,崔巍,等.尿液中苯丙胺类毒品的检验方法研究[C].第四届全国毒物分析学术交流会论文选.北京:海潮出版社,2008:7-12.
  • 4Lee M R, Yu S C, Lin C L, et al. Solid-phase extraction in amphetamine and methamphetamine analysis of urine [J]. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 1997, 21 (4): 278-282.
  • 5Miller E I, Wylie F M, Oliver J S. Simultaneous detection and quantification of amphetamines, diazepam and its metabolites, cocaine and its metabolites, and opiates in hair by LC-ESI-MS-MS using a single extraction method [J]. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 2008, 32 (7) :457-469.
  • 6Skender L, Karacic V, Brcic I, et al. Quantitative determination of amphetamines, cocaine, and opiates in human hair by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry[J]. Forensic Science International, 2002, 125 (2) : 120-126.
  • 7Soriano T,Jurado C, Menendez M, et al. Improved solidphase extraction method for systematic toxicological analysis in biological fluids [J]. Journal of Analytical Toxicology,2001,25(2) : 137- 143.
  • 8赵蕴泽.快速毒品检测仪的研制[D].吉林:吉林大学出版社,2010.
  • 9张慧慧.电致化学发光分子印迹传感器的制备及其在毒品检测中的应用[D].江苏:江南大学出版社,2002.
  • 10Aso Navaee, Abdollah Salimi, Hazhir Teymourian. Graphene nanosheets modified glassy carbon electrode for simultaneous detection of heroine, morphine and noscapine [J]. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2012, 31 (1): 205-211.

共引文献35

同被引文献147

引证文献12

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部