期刊文献+

正常成人前列腺3.0T磁共振3种b值扩散加权成像研究 被引量:4

Study on Three b-Values in 3.0T DW MRI of Normal Prostates
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨正常前列腺3.0T磁共振扩散加成像(DWI)的影像表现,为合理选择扩散敏感系数(b值)提供依据。方法选取20名健康志愿者,每名志愿者行3次前列腺DWI扫描,b值分别取600、800、1000 s/mm^2,其他参数均一样。测量3种b值DWI图像中前列腺中央带和外周带的信号强度、背景信号强度标准差、表观扩散系数(ADC),计算图像信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR),并对图像质量进行主观评分。结果b值为600、800、1000 s/mm^2时,SNR分别为(18.36±1.75)、(14.63±2.32)、(11.83±1.65),CNR分别为(0.55±0.14)、(0.47±0.11)、(0.39±0.90),3组间比较SNR和CNR的差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。b值为600 s/mm^2时,前列腺外周带和中央带的ADC值分别为(2.07±0.26)×10^(-3)mm^2/s和(2.01±0.15)×10^(-3)mm^2/s,差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05);b值为800 s/mm^2时,外周带和中央带的ADC值分别为(1.80±0.22)×10^(-3)mm^2/s和(1.65±0.24)×10^(-3)mm^2/s,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);b值为1000 s/mm^2时,外周带和中央带的ADC值分别(1.54±0.14)×10^(-3)mm^2/s和(1.31±0.19)×10-3 mm^2/s,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。3种b值的图像质量评分分别为(3.4±0.68)、(3.05±0.69)和(2.75±0.91),3组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论利用3.0T磁共振对前列腺进行DWI扫描时,选择b值为800 s/mm^2较为适当,可在保证图像质量的前提下更好地反映水分子的扩散特征。 Objective To investigate the features of normal prostates in 3.0T DW MR(Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance) images so as to provide a basis for selection of the optimal b-value.Methods Three b-values(b=600,800,1000 s/mm^2) were applied respectively in 3.0T DW MR imaging of twenty normal prostates.Then,the signal intensity,standard deviation of the background signal intensity and apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) values were measured in DWI of the central zone and peripheral zone of prostates.The signal-noise ratio(SNR) and contrast-noise ratio(CNR) were computed.And the quality of MR images were evaluated.Results When b-value was 600,800 and 1000s/mm^2,the SNR was(18.36±1.75),(14.63±2.32) and(11.83±1.65) and the CNR was(0.55±0.14),(0.47±0.11) and(0.39±0.90)respectively.There were statistically significant difference in SNR and CNR between different b-values(P〈0.05).When b-value was 600 s/mm^2,the ADC values acquired in MR imaging of the peripheral zone and central zone of prostates were(2.07±0.26)×10^-3 mm^2/s and(2.01±0.15)×10^-3 mm^2/s respectively without statistically significant differences(P〈0.05).When b-value was 800 and 1000 s/mm^2,the ADC values of the peripheral zone and central zone of prostates were(1.80±0.22)×10^-3mm^2/s and(1.65±0.24)×10^-3 mm^2/s,(1.54±0.14)×10^-3 mm^2/s and(1.31±0.19)×10^-3 mm^2/s respectively with statistically significant differences(P〈0.05).The quality of MR images at three b-values(600,800,1000 s/mm^2) were evaluated as(3.4±0.68),(3.05±0.69) and(2.75±0.91) respectively with statistically significant differences(P〈0.05).Conclusion The optimal b-value in 3.0T DW MRI of prostates was800 s/mm^2,which can display the diffusion of water molecules and meanwhile ensure the quality of images.
出处 《中国医疗设备》 2015年第2期59-62,共4页 China Medical Devices
关键词 磁共振成像 弥散加权成像 前列腺 扩散敏感系数 magnetic resonance imaging diffusion-weighted imaging prostates b-value
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献82

共引文献76

同被引文献52

  • 1张小马,梁朝朝.正常前列腺形态组织学及影像学研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(11):787-789. 被引量:8
  • 2史浩,丁红宇.弥散加权成像在前列腺癌诊断与鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J].中华男科学杂志,2007,13(7):605-609. 被引量:13
  • 3杨正汉,冯逢,王霄英.磁共振成像技术指南[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2010:273.
  • 4Beppu T, lnoue T, Shibata Y, et al. Fractional anisotropy value hy diffusion tensor magnetic resoance imaging as a predictor of cell density and proliferation activity of glioblastomas [ J ]. Surg Neurol, 2005, 63(1 ): 56-61.
  • 5Jolapara M, Patro SN, Kesavadas C, et al. Can diffusion tensor metrics help in preoperative grading of diffusely infiltrating astro- eytomas? A retrospective study of 36 cases [ J]. Neuroradiology, 2011, 53(1): 63-68.
  • 6de Carvalho Rangel C, Hygino Cruz LC Jr, Takayassu TC, et al. Diffusion MR imaging in central nervous system [ J]. Magn Reson hnaging Clin N Am, 2011, 19( 1 ) : 23-53.
  • 7Shimofusa R, Fujimoto H, Akamata H, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate caneer [ J] . J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2005, 29(2) : 149-153.
  • 8Li C, Chen M, Li S, et al. Detection of prostate cancer in pe- ripheral zone: comparison of MR diffusion tensor imaging, quanti- tative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR1, and the two techniques combined at 3.0 T [J]. Acta Radiol, 2014, 55(2) : 239-247.
  • 9lwazawa J, Mitani T, Sassa S, et al. Prostate cancer detection with MRI : is dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging necessary in ad- dition to diffusion-weighted imaging? [ J]. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2011 , 17(3) : 243-248.
  • 10Oto A, Yang C, Kayhan A, et al. Diffusion-weighted and dynam- ic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quan- titative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis [J]. AJR, 2011, 197(6): 1382-1390.

引证文献4

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部