期刊文献+

神经刺激仪引导下连续外周神经阻滞用于下肢术后镇痛的效果 被引量:20

Effects of nerve stimulator guided continuous peripheral nerve block compared with PCIA and PCEA on analgesia after lower limb surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察神经刺激仪引导下连续外周神经阻滞用于下肢术后镇痛的效果。方法 90例择期行单侧下肢手术的患者,随机均分为:神经刺激仪引导下连续外周神经阻滞镇痛组(N组),连续硬膜外镇痛组(E组),连续静脉给药镇痛组(I组)。N组麻醉前根据手术情况选择适当的下肢神经在刺激仪的引导下定位、穿刺留置导管;E组麻醉前行腰段(L3~4)硬膜外穿刺留置导管。三组患者麻醉方法及用药相同,手术结束前10min,N组经留置导管推注0.2%罗哌卡因15ml;E组经留置导管推注0.2%罗哌卡因10ml,I组静脉推注地佐辛5mg后接镇痛泵,配方分别为:N组0.2%罗哌卡因;E组0.2%罗哌卡因与0.5μg/ml舒芬太尼混合液;I组1.0μg/ml舒芬太尼。记录麻醉前(T0)、术后1h(T1)、4h(T2)、12h(T3)、24h(T4)、48h(T5)的SBP、DBP、HR、SpO2、VAS评分和Ramsay镇静评分及不良反应发生情况。结果与I组比较,N组和E组术后T1~T5时VAS评分明显降低(P〈0.05);T1~T3时Ramsay镇静评分明显升高(P〈0.05)。与T0和N组比较,T1~T3时E组SBP、DBP明显下降(P〈0.05)。与N组比较,E组和I组恶心呕吐、瘙痒发生率也明显升高(P〈0.05);E组的尿潴留发生率也明显升高(P〈0.05)。三组头晕、运动阻滞发生率差异无统计学意义。结论神经刺激仪引导下连续外周神经阻滞用于下肢手术后镇痛简便、安全、镇痛完善且不良反应少,值得临床推广。 Objective To observe the analgesic effect of nerve stimulator guided continuous peripheral nerve block.Methods Ninety patients received elective lower limb surgery were randomly divided into three groups:nerve stimulator guided continuous peripheral nerve block group(groupN),continuous epidural block group(group E),intravenous infusion of sufentanil group(group I).The patients in group N received puncture and cathetering of lower limbs nerve by nerve stimulator guided.The patients in group E recerved puncture and cathetering of lumber epidural space(L3-4).patients in group N received patient controlled analgesia with 0.2%ropivacaine,and group E with epidural 0.2%ropivacaine and sufentanil(0.5μg/ml),and group I with intravenous sufentanil(1.0μg/ml)immediately when they were awake.They vital signs,VAS pain scores,Ramsay scores,at 1,4,12,24,48 h postoperatively were recorded.The side effects were recorded.Results The VAS scores in group N and group E at every time points were significantly lower than those in group I(P〈0.05).Ramsay scores in group N at 1,4,12 hpostoperatively were lower than those in group I(P〈0.05).The systolic and diastolic blood pressures in group N were smoother than those in group E(P〈0.05).group N had lower nausea,vomiting and pruritus than groups E and I(P〈0.05).Groups N and I had lower urinary retention than group E(P〈0.05).Conclusion Nerve stimulator guided continuous peripheral nerve block can significantly reduce the lower limb post-surgery pain with less side effects and can be used easily and safely for analgesia of lower limb surgery.
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第10期1008-1011,共4页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
关键词 神经刺激仪 下肢手术 连续外周神经阻滞 硬膜外镇痛 静脉镇痛 Nerve stimulator Lower limb surgery Continuous peripheral nerve block Epidural analgesia Intravenous analgesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Kehlet H, Hole K. Effect of postoperative analgesia on surgical outcome. Br J Anaesth, 2001,87(1) : 61-63.
  • 2孙焱芫,译.急性术后疼痛//Miller RD,主编.邓小明,曾因明,主译.米勒麻醉学.第7版.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2011:2781-2801.
  • 3Wu CL, Cohen, SR, Richman JM, et al. Efficacy of postopera- tive patient-controlled and continuors infusion epidural analge- sia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with opi- oids A meta-analysis. Anesthesiology, 2005, 103 ( 5 ).- 1078-1081.
  • 4Ho AM, Karmakar MK. Combined paravertebral lumbar plex- us and parasacral sciatic nerve block for reduction of hip frac- ture in a patient with severe aortie stenosis. Can J Anaestb, 2002,49 (9) .. 946-950.
  • 5Richman JM, Liu SS, Courpas G, et al. Does continuous pe- ripheral nerve block provide superior pain control to opioids.. A meta-analysis. Anesth Anatg, 2006, 102(3):245-249.
  • 6Enneking FK, Chan V, Greger J, et al. Lower-extremity pe- ripheral nerve blockade: essentials of our current understand- ing. Reg Anesth pain Meal,2005,30(1):4-35.
  • 7Auroy Y, Benhamou D,Barguest L, et al. Major complications of regional anesthesia in France:The SOS Regional Anesthesia t-Iotline Service. Anesthesiology, 2002,97(12)..12742-1275.
  • 8陈云俊,夏艳,胡海青,张勇,万郑绪,丁振林.神经刺激仪引导下外周神经阻滞与蛛网膜下腔阻滞用于下肢手术的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2013,29(8):749-751. 被引量:25

二级参考文献4

  • 1AdmirHadlic,VlokaJD,主编.薛富善,主译.周围神经阻滞原理与实践.第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:160-171.
  • 2Casati A, Fanelli G, Borghi B, et al. Ropivacaine or 2 mepi- vacaine for lower limb peripheral nerve blocks. Study Group on Orthopedic Anesthesia of the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia,and Intensive Care. Anesthesiology, 1999,90 (4) : 1047-1052.
  • 3MillerRD,主编.邓小明,曾因明,主译.米勒麻醉学.第7版.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2011:1651.
  • 4田玉科,梅伟,主编.超声定位神经阻滞图谱.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:258-259.

共引文献24

同被引文献161

  • 1韩传宝,钱燕宁,周钦海.术后镇痛对机体应激反应的调控[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),2005,26(2):74-77. 被引量:77
  • 2吴志林,张小洺,孙宇.神经刺激仪与外周神经阻滞[J].实用疼痛学杂志,2006,2(1):44-47. 被引量:25
  • 3薛杨,龚志毅,徐仲煌,褚庆福,黄宇光.急性下肢动脉栓塞取栓术患者腰神经丛-坐骨神经联合阻滞的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(2):180-181. 被引量:6
  • 4赵良俊,于萍,马海滨,罗运柏.混合溶剂与超声波辅助提取茄尼醇的工艺研究[J].精细化工中间体,2007,37(1):37-40. 被引量:5
  • 5黄宇光 罗爱伦.麻醉学[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2000.138-139.
  • 6Drosos GI, Blatsoukas KS, Ververidis A, et al. Blood trans- fusion and cytokines~ changes in total knee replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2012,132(10) ; 1505-1513.
  • 7Fowler SJ, Symons J, Sabato S, et al. Epidural analgesia corn pared with peripheral nerve blockade after major knee surger y~ a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized tri als. Br J Anaesth,2008,100(2) : 154-164.
  • 8Shanthanna H, Huilgol M, Manivackam VK, et al. Compara- tive study of ultrasound-guided continuous femoral nerveblockade with continuous epidural analgesia for pain relief fol- lowing total knee replacement. Indian J Anaesth, 2012, 56 (3) ~ 270-275.
  • 9Fowler SJ, Symons J, Sabato S, et al. Epidural analgesia compared with peripheral nerve blockade afer major knee sur- gery., a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth,2008,100(2) : 154-164.
  • 10Jun YS, Kang P, Min SS, et al. Effect of eucalyptus oil inha- lation on pain and inflammatory responses after total knee re- placement: a randomized clinical trial. Evid Based Comple- ment Altermat Med, 2013,2013 : 502727.

引证文献20

二级引证文献150

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部