摘要
朝鲜与明朝都产生过较为激烈的党争,且影响较大。与明朝党争相比,朝鲜党争的性质更为清晰。朝鲜公论政治成为国家政治生活的常态,党争成员基本上属于士大夫阶层,在政治上有高度的自觉性,因此党争基本上起源于士大夫内部的分化,其中朱子学思想和观点的分歧在党争中占据了一个很重要的比例。而明朝是中国政治、经济、文化发展的一个重要时期,党争参与者的身份多样,各种派别在皇权的制约下相互牵制和抗衡,阳明学的产生和发展更是对官方朱子学产生了冲击,也对明朝党争产生了重要影响。通过与明朝党争的比较,更容易发现朝鲜王朝党争的特殊性。
Fierce partisan warfare happened both in Korean Dynasty and Ming Dynasty. However, party rivalries in Korean Dynasty originated from the inner separation of scholarbureaucrats due to the popularization of public disscussion on politics and different views on Zhu Xi＇s Doctrines, while those involved in the partisan warfare in Ming Dynasty were from various strata and different parties countervailed under the restraint of the imperial power. Besides, the development of Yang-ming school of philosophy partisan warfare as well. The comparison shows that features of Korean Dynasty are more obvious. impacted greatly on the the partisan warfare in
出处
《延边大学学报（社会科学版）》
2015年第2期119-127,共9页
Journal of Yanbian University：Social Science Edition
关键词
明朝党争
朝鲜党争
公论政治
朱子学
阳明学
特征
partisan warfare in Ming Dynasty
partisan warfare in Korean Dynasty
publicdisscussion on politics
Zhu Xi＇s Doctrines
Yang-ming school of philosophy
feature
