期刊文献+

经尿道汽化电切术治疗重度前列腺增生症103例 被引量:5

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价经尿道前列腺汽化电切术(TUVP)治疗重度前列腺增生症的临床效果及安全性.方法 对行TUVP治疗的103例重度前列腺增生患者的病例资料行回顾性分析.结果 TUVP平均手术时间50 min,无发生尿道电切综合征,无被膜穿孔,发生暂时性尿失禁3例,尿道外口狭窄4例,术后随访1~12个月,残余尿量、前列腺症状评分、生活质量评分与术前比较均有明显改善(均P<0.05).结论 结论TUVP是治疗重度前列腺增生安全有效的治疗方式.
作者 冯志明
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2015年第4期588-589,共2页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献21

共引文献35

同被引文献45

  • 1郑鸣,陈金洋,曾铬强,李树人.改良经尿道前列腺电切除术对良性前列腺增生患者性功能及下尿路症状的影响[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(10):3093-3095. 被引量:18
  • 2Xie CY,Zhu GB,Wang XH,et al. Five-year follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial comparing bipolar plasmakinetic and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate[ J]. Yonsei Med J,2012,53(4) :734-741.
  • 3Angela DL, Ma XG, David MM, et al. Physical activity, sedentary behaviors, physical fitness, and their relation to health outcomes in youth with type 1 and type 2 diabetes : A review of the epidemio- logic literature[ J]. J Sport Health Sci ,2013,16(2 ) :21-38.
  • 4Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, et al. Evidence of im- paired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders [ J ]. Fertil Steril,2011,96(2) :344-348.
  • 5Zhao Z, Zeng G, Zhong W, et al. A prospective, randomised trial comparing plasmakinetic enucleatiort to standard transurethral resec- tion of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: three-year follow-up results[ J]. Eur Urol, 2010,58 (5) :752-758.
  • 6Liu C, Zheng S, Li H, et al. Transurethral enueleation and resection of prostate in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia by plasma ki- netics [ J ]. J Urol, 2010,184 ( 6 ) : 2440-2445.
  • 7Schroeck FR, Hollingsworth JM, Kaufman SR, et al. Population based trends in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. J Urol, 2012,188 (5) : 1837-1841.
  • 8Lowrance WT, Southwick A, Maschino AC, et al. Contemporary practice patterns of endoscopic surgical management for benign prosta- tic hyperplasia among urologists in the United States [ J ]. J Urol, 2013,189(5) :1811-1816.
  • 9Gilling P. TURP remains a safe and effective alternative for benign pros- tatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgery[J]. BJU Int, 2014,113(1) :5-6.
  • 10Whitty JA, Crosland P, Hewson K, et al. A cost-minirnisation analy- sis comparing photoseleetive vaporisation (PVP) and transurethral re- section of the prostate (TURP) for the management of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in Queensland, Australia [J]. BJU Int, 2014,113(Suppl 2) :21-28.

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部