期刊文献+

基于模块化分解的故障树分析方法 被引量:5

Fault Tree Analysis Method Based on Modular Decomposition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统故障树分析算法存在诊断成本高和耗时长的问题,为此,在研究故障树结构中的特殊规律的基础上,采用深度优先最左遍历算法对故障树进行模块化分解,减小故障树分析的规模。结合if-then-else运算符,将最左底层模块子树转化为相应的二元决策图结构。运用深度优先最左遍历算法得到该二元决策图结构中的割集和最小割集,用相同故障概率的基本事件替代最左底层模块子树得到新故障树。采用自底向上、从左至右的递归综合分析思想,获得系统元件故障发生的概率,实现对故障树的分析。对故障实例的分析诊断结果表明,该方法可有效提高诊断速度,减少诊断成本。 For solving the diagnose cost and time applied to traditional fault tree analysis,based on studying the special disciplinarian of fault tree,this paper adopts the depth first left most searching algorithm to decompose the fault tree into modules,and decreases the scale of fault tree analysis.Combined with if-then-else operator,it converts the most left and bottom module binary decision diagram.It applies the depth first left most searching algorithm to acquire the cut set and the minimum cut set of the binary decision diagram,and then uses a new bottom event with the same failure probability to replace the module to generate a new fault tree.The probability that system elements occur faults is obtained by comprehensive analysis of from bottom to up and from left to right,and the fault tree analysis is finished.By analyzing fault diagnosis,it is verified that the method improves the speed of diagnose and decreases the cost of diagnose.
出处 《计算机工程》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第2期141-144,共4页 Computer Engineering
基金 广东省产学研基金资助项目(2012B091000138) 珠海市产学研基金资助项目(2012D0501990003 2013D0501990002)
关键词 故障树 故障诊断 模块化 二元决策图 故障概率 深度优先搜索 fault tree fault diagnosis modular Binary Decision Diagram(BDD) fault probability depth first searching
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献105

共引文献215

同被引文献36

  • 1邓明,金业壮.航空发动机故障诊断[M].北京:北京航空航天大学出版社,2012.
  • 2KAREN A R, ANDREWS J D. A fault tree analysis strategy using binary decision diagrams [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2002, 78(1): 45-56.
  • 3IBANEZ-LLANO C, RAUZY A, MELENDEZ E, et al. A reduction approach to improve the quantification of linked fault trees through binary decision diagrams[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2010, 95: 1314-1323.
  • 4SINNAMON R M, ANDREWS J D. New approaches to evaluating fault trees[J]. Quality and Reliability Engi- neering International, 1997, 58(2): 89-96.
  • 5RAUZY A. New algorithms for fault tree analysis[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1993, 40 (3) : 203-211.
  • 6BARTLETT L M, ANDREWS J D. An ordering heu- ristic to develop the binary decision diagram based on structural importance[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2001, 72(1): 31-38.
  • 7BARTLETT L M, Du S. New progressive variable or- dering for binary decision diagram analysis of fault trees [J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2005, 21(4): 413-425.
  • 8孙艳,杜素果.一种二元决策图底事件排序的新方法[J].系统管理学报,2008,17(2):210-216. 被引量:9
  • 9倪绍徐,张裕芳,易宏,梁晓锋.基于故障树的智能故障诊断方法[J].上海交通大学学报,2008,42(8):1372-1375. 被引量:78
  • 10安晨亮.故障树原理在故障诊断系统中的应用[J].导弹与航天运载技术,2009(1):48-51. 被引量:28

引证文献5

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部