摘要
自2013年9月9日"两高"出台《关于办理利用信息网络实施诽谤等刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》以来,学界对寻衅滋事罪的司法扩大化适用问题颇有争议,对《解释》进行合理解读,有利于防止寻衅滋事罪不当扩大。《解释》肯定了信息网络属于公共场所、公共秩序不限于公共场所秩序,具有合理性,但为防止寻衅滋事罪的滥用,只有具有公开属性的信息网络才属于公共场所,同时仅破坏网络秩序的行为不属于网络寻衅滋事。实践中应严格认定"造成公共秩序严重混乱",要求司法机关严格举证行为与"严格混乱"的因果关系,处罚上做好刑行衔接。
Since September 9,2013,Supreme Court and Highest Procuratorate issued “Explanation in regard to some is-sues of applicable law to deal with the use of information network implementation of libel and other criminal cases”,the academic community has some controversies about “Explanation”of judicial expansion problem to understand and apply to reasonable interpretation of this September “Explanation”to prevent improper trouble crimes.The “Explanation”af-firms reasonably that information network belongs to the public place and public order is not limited to public place order, but in order to prevent improper trouble crimes,the information network which has public character should belongs to the public,the network order stir-up-trouble behavior does not belong to the network.Practice should identify strictly the“severe disorder of public order”,the judicial should prove strictly causality of action and “severe disorder of public or-der”,insuring the connection of Criminal law and Administrative law on punishment.
出处
《重庆邮电大学学报（社会科学版）》
北大核心
2015年第2期32-37,共6页
Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition)
基金
西南政法大学研究生科研创新计划项目:网络寻衅滋事行为的刑法规制--基于<刑法>第293条的扩张解释分析(2013XZYJS223)
