期刊文献+

伊立替康/替莫唑胺/长春新碱联合治疗儿童复发/难治实体瘤58例分析 被引量:4

Effective chemotherapy with irinotecan plus temozolomide and vincristine in children and adolescents with recurrent or refractory solid tumors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨伊立替康/替莫唑胺/长春新碱治疗儿童、青少年复发/难治性实体瘤的疗效和毒性。方法 从2011年9月-2014年4月,58例复发或难治儿童、青少年恶性实体肿瘤患者入组。采用替莫唑胺100 mg/(m^2·d),口服,第1~5 d;伊立替康50 mg/(m^2·d),在替莫唑胺口服1 h后静脉滴注,第1-5 d;长春新碱1.5 mg/m^2,第1 d。每3周重复。每两个疗程评估疗效。结果 58例患者中,男32例,女26例。中位年龄6(1~18)岁。神经母细胞瘤28例,横纹肌肉瘤12例,尤文氏肉瘤/原始神经外胚叶瘤3例,肝母细胞瘤3例,横纹肌样瘤3例,肾母细胞瘤2例,生殖细胞瘤、骨肉瘤、间叶源性恶性肿瘤、纤维肉瘤、恶性外周神经鞘瘤、髓母细胞瘤和鼻咽癌各1例。化疗后完全缓解(CR)5例,部分缓解(PR)13例,稳定(SD)17例,进展(PD)23例。全组患者客观有效率(CR+PR)为31.0%,疾病控制率(CR+PR+SD)为60.3%。其中神经母细胞瘤有效率为39.3%;横纹肌肉瘤25.0%。共16例(27.6%)患者化疗后能获得局部治疗机会。神经母细胞瘤1年无进展生存率和总生存率分别为(23.4±10.8)%和(39.0±11.0)%。主要毒性为骨髓抑制和腹泻,对症处理可恢复。结论 伊立替康/替莫唑胺/长春新碱联合方案是儿童、青少年复发/难治实体瘤有效的挽救化疗方案,毒性可耐受。 Objective To determine the efficacy of irinotecan plus temozolomide and vincristine in children and adolescents with recurrent/refractory solid tumors. Methods Fiftyeight children and adolescents with recurrent or refractory solid tumors were included. Temozolomide (100 mg/m^2 ·d) was given orally for 5 consecutive days, and irinotecan (50 mg/m^2 ·d) was administered intravenously one hour after oral temozolomide for 5 consecutive days, and vincristine ( 1.5 mg/m^2 ·d) was administered intravenously on day one. The cycles were repeated three-weekly. The efficacy was evaluated every two weeks. Results Among the 58 patients, 32 were male and 26 were female, with the median age of 6 years old. The solid tumors including neuroblastoma (28 cases), rhabdomyosarcoma (12 cases), Ewing's sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor ( 3 cases ), hepatoblastoma ( 3 cases ), rhabdoid tumor (3 cases), nephroblastoma (2 cases), germ-cell tumor (1 case), osteosarcoma (1 case ), mesenchymal tumors (1 case), fibrosarcoma (1 case), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (1 case), medulloblastoma (1 case) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (1 case). Five cases reached complete remission (CR), 13 cases reached partial remission (PR), 17 cases reached stable disease (SD), and 23 cases reached progression disease (PD). After chemotherapy, the objective response rate was 31.0% , and the disease control rate was 60.3%. The objective response rate for neuroblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma were 39.3% and 25.0% , respectively. Sixteen patients (27.6%) underwent local treatment after chemotherapy. In the 28 patients with NB, the estimated 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival were (23.4 + 10.8)% and (39.0 _+ 11.0)%, respectively. The main side- effects were myelosuppression and diarrhea. Conclusions The salvage regimen of irinotecan plus temozolomide and vincristine was safe and effective in children and adolescents with recurrent and refractory solid tumors.
出处 《中国小儿血液与肿瘤杂志》 CAS 2015年第1期17-21,共5页 Journal of China Pediatric Blood and Cancer
关键词 儿童 复发 肿瘤 化疗 Children Relapse Tumor Chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Oberlin O, Rey A, Sanchez de Toledo J, et al. Randomized comparison of intensified six-drug versus standard three-drug chemotherapy for high-risk nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma and other chemotherapy-sensitive childhood soft tissue sarcomas: long- term results from the International Society of Pediatric Oncology MMT95 study. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30: 2457-2465.
  • 2Ashraf K, Shaikh F, Gibson P, et al. Treatment with topotecan plus cyclophosphamide in children with first relapse of neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2013, 60: 1636-1641.
  • 3Song BS, Seo J, Kim DH, et al. Gemcitabine and docetaxel for the treatment of children and adolescents with recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma: Korea Cancer Center Hospital experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2014, 61: 1376-1381.
  • 4Houghton PJ, Cheshire PJ, Hallman JC, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of the topoisomerase I inhibitor 7-ethyl-10-(4-[ l-piperidino l-1- piperidino ) -carbonyloxy-camptothecin against human tumor xenografts: lack of cross-resistance in vivo in tumors with acquired resistance to the topoisomerase I inhibitor 9-dimethylaminomethyl-10- hydroxycamptothecin. Cancer Res, 1993, 53:2823-2829.
  • 5Vassal G, Terrier-Lacombe M J, Bissery MC, et al. Therapeutic activity of CPT-11, a DNA-topoisomerase I inhibitor, against peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumour and neuroblastoma xenografts. Br J Cancer, 1996, 74:537-545.
  • 6Shitara T, Shimada A, Hanada R, et al. Irinotecan for children with relapsed solid tumors. Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 2006, 23 : 103-110.
  • 7Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group, Lager JJ, Lyden ER, et al. Pooled analysis of phase II window studies in children with contemporary high-risk metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24: 3415-3422.
  • 8Bagatell R, London WB, Wagner LM, et al. Phase II study of irinotecan and temozolomide in children with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: a Children's Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29:208-213.
  • 9Casey DA, Wexler LH, Merchant MS, et al. Irinotecan and temozolomide for Ewing sarcoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2009, 53:1029-1034.
  • 10Blaney S, Berg SL, Pratt C, et al. A phase I study of irinotecan in pediatric patients: a pediatric oncology group study. Clin Cancer Res, 2001, 7:32-37.

同被引文献11

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部