基于范式演进的工程项目风险分担研究被引量：6

Research on Risk Allocation of Construction Project Based on Paradigm Evolvement

下载PDF

导出

摘要基于范式演进学说,通过对已有工程项目风险分担相关研究文献的综述性归纳,研究得出:工程项目风险分担研究的发展脉络与项目本质认知的深化具有关联性,从项目一次性特征到临时契约及社会网络的本质认知,工程项目情景下的风险分担研究呈现出范式演进的特征;技术与组织范式关注于从风险识别、评估及分配等分担过程的视角揭示其改善机理,但研究缺乏"经济人"与"社会人"假设下的分析,有悖于现实情景;而契约范式与关系范式的兴起则拓展了风险分担解释空间,揭示了社会资本、信任等关系情景或要素对风险分担的作用机理。 Based on paradigm evolution philosophy, the study provides the following findings through summa- rizing the existing risk-allocation literatures： Development of research on construction project risk allocation is co- related with deepening cognition of nature of the project. Along with cognition from one-off project to temporary contracts and social networks, risk allocation study is showing characteristics of paradigm evolution. Technical and organizational paradigm focused on risk identification, risk assessment and risk allocation processes to reveal the mechanism of risk allocation improvement, but the study lacks analysis under the premise of ＂economic man＂ and ＂social man＂, which is contrary to a realistic scenario; while the rise of contract paradigm and relational paradigm expanded the explanation space of risk allocation, revealing action mechanism of social capital, trust and other rela- tionship scenarios or factors on risk allocation.

作者董宇尹贻林王垚

机构地区天津大学管理与经济学部天津理工大学管理学院

出处《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期83-91,共9页 Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)

基金国家自然科学基金项目(71172175)

关键词工程项目风险分担范式演进契约范式关系范式 construction project risk allocation research evolvement contractual paradigm relational para-digm

分类号 F287.7 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献49

1LAMK C, WANG D, LEE P T K, et al. Modeling risk allocation decision in construction contracts [J]. International Journal of Pro- ject Management, 2007,25 (5) :485 - 493.
2HAMEED A, WOO S K. Risk importance and allocation in the Pakistan construction industry:A contractors' perspective [J]. Jour- nal of Civil Engineering,2007,11 (2) :73 -80.
3KEY J, WANG S Q, CHAN A P C, et al. Research trend of public-private partnership in construction journals [J]. Journal of Con- struction Engineering and Management, 2009,135 ( 10 ) : 1076 - 1086.
4ABEDNEGO M P, OGUNLANA S O. Good project governance for proper risk allocation in public - private partnerships in Indonesia [J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2006,24 ( 7 ) :622 - 634.
5UFF J. Risk management and procurement in construction [M]. London:Centre of Construction Law and Management, 1995.
6严玲,赵华.项目所有权配置下代建项目风险分担机制研究[J].武汉理工大学学报（信息与管理工程版）,2009,31(1):121-125. 被引量：17
7LOOSEMORE M. Power, responsibility and construction conflict [J]. Construction Management Economy, 1999,17 ( 6 ) : 699 - 711.
8ZAGHLOUL R, HARTMAN F. Construction contracts: The cost of mistrust [J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2003,21(6) :419 -424.
9KUHN T S.科学革命的结构[M].金吾伦,胡新,译.北京:北京大学出版社.2004.
10TURNER J R, MULLER R. On the nature of the project as a temporary organization [J]. International Journal of Project Manage- ment ,2003,21 ( 1 ) : 1 - 8.