期刊文献+

止血凝胶封闭微创经皮肾通道的安全性及可行性研究

Study of the safety and feasibility of tubeless percutaneous nephrostolithotomy by hemostasis gel closure of mini-percutaneous renal-channel
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 研究止血凝胶封闭微创经皮肾通道的安全性及可行性.方法 采用MPCNL治疗的简单性肾结石及输尿管上段结石80例,对照组术后放置14 F肾造瘘管,实验组采用止血凝胶封闭微创经皮肾通道,不放置肾造瘘管,手术为单通道.统计学分析对照组与实验组术后患者疼痛需要应用镇痛药物的发病率和剂量、手术后患者血红蛋白下降情况、术后患者术后出现持续出血,感染及尿外渗等并发症发生情况以及手术后住院的时间.结果 两组患者均一期手术成功,对照组患者术后疼痛需要应用镇痛药物的发病率明显高于实验组(42.5% vs 20%),而术后出现出血、感染等并发症的发病率以及手术后的住院时间,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组患者术后复查均未出现肾周围血肿,对照组患者出现7例拔出造瘘管后的漏尿.结论 止血凝胶封闭微创经皮肾通道的经皮肾碎石取石术降低了患者手术后的痛苦,避免手术后拔出肾造瘘管漏尿的发病率,对于简单的肾结石和输尿管结石患者是安全可靠的手术方式. Objective To study the safety and feasibility of tubeless percutaneous nephrostolithotomy by hemostasis gel closure of mini-percutaneous renal-channel.Methods Eighty patients after conventional percutaneous nephrostolithotomy are selected and divided into two groups according to the principle of randomization.Control group adopts conventional percutaneous nephrostolithotomy calculi lithotripsy with renal pelvis drainage tube placement whereas the experimental group adopts tubeless percutaneous nephrostolithotomy by hemostasis gel closure of mini-percutaneous renal channel.Both experimental group and control group will be scientifically and statistically analyzed via the incidence and the dose of using sedative for alleviating pain after operation,hospital stay,level of hemoglobin,and the occurrence of complications such as continuate hemorrhage,infection,urinary extravasation,etc.Results The operation of both groups are successful in phrase Ⅰ.The incidence and the dose of using sedative in control group are obviously higher than that in experimental group(45% vs 20%).However,the incidence of postoperative complications like infection and hemorrhage and hospital stay between two groups are undifferentiated in statistics(P 〉 0.05).Neither the experimental group nor the control group has perinephric hematoma,and seven cases of control group have urinary leakage after remove of fistula.Conclusion Tubeless percutaneous nephrostolithotomy by hemostasis gel closure of mini-percutaneous renal-channel is safe and feasible and it can reduce the incidence of postoperative pain and avoid urinary leakage.
出处 《国际外科学杂志》 2015年第1期32-35,共4页 International Journal of Surgery
关键词 凝胶类 微创经皮肾通道 输尿管结石 肾结石 Gels Mini-percutaneous renal-channel Ureteral calculi Kidney calculi
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Jackman SV, Hediean SP, Peters CA, et al. Percutaneous nephro- lithotomy in infants and preschool:experience with a new technique [J]. Urology, 1998, 52(4) : 697-701.
  • 2曾国华,李逊,何朝辉,单炽昌,袁坚,陈文忠,王露萍,吴开俊.微创经皮肾取石术和传统经皮肾镜取石术对肾皮质损伤的比较[J].中华实验外科杂志,2004,21(12):1551-1552. 被引量:118
  • 3Pietrow PK, Auge BK, Lallas CD, et al. Pain afler percutaneous nephnlithotomy :impact tJf nephrostomy tube size [ J ]. J Endomvl, 2003, 17(6) : 411-414.
  • 4Limb J, Bellman GC. Tubeless per'utaneous renal surgery: review of first 112 patients [ J ]. Urology, 2002, 59 (4) : 527- 531.
  • 5高小峰,陈书尚,周铁,王林辉,许传亮,高旭,侯建国,孙颖浩.经皮肾镜取石术后不留置肾盂造瘘管的疗效评价[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2008,29(10):675-677. 被引量:9
  • 6Lee DI, Uribe C, Eichel L, et al. Sealing PCNL tracts with Gelatin Matrix Hemostatic Sealant ( FloSeal ) : Initial clinical use [J]. J Urol, 2004, 171 (2 pll ) : 575-578.
  • 7Shah HN, Hegde S, Shah JN, et al. A prospective, randomized trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of fibrin sealant in tubeless percu- taneous nephro|ithutomy[ J ] J Uvl, 2006, 176 (6 pt ) : 2488- 2493.
  • 8Liatsikos EN, Hum D, Dinlenc CZ, et al. 'Fail stent versus re-elltry tube:A randonfized comprrisnn after pereutaneoas stone extraction [J]. Urology, 2002, 59(1 ) : 15-19.
  • 9Paul EM, Mareovich R, Lee BR, et al. Choosing the ideal nephros- tomy tube [ J ] BJU hit, 2003, 92 ( 7 ) : 672-677.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Pietrow PK, Auge BK, Lallas CD, et al. Pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: impact of nephrostomy tube size. J Endourol, 2003, 17:411-414
  • 2Desai MR, Kukreja RA, Desai MM, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy:large bore versus small bore versus tubeless. J Urol, 2004, 172:565-567.
  • 3Lojanapiwat B, Soonthornphan S, Wudhikarn S. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients. J Endourol, 2001, 15: 711-713.
  • 4Shah H, Hegde S, Shah J, et al. Safety and efficacy of supracostal access in tubeless percutaneous nepbrolithotomy. J Endourol, 2006, 20:1016-1021.
  • 5Liatsikos EN, Horn D, Dinlenc CZ, eta. Tail stent versus reentry tube: A randomized comparison after percutaneous stone extraction. Urology, 2002, 59: 15-19.
  • 6Paul EM, Marcovich R, Lee BR, et al. Choosing the ideal nephrostomy tube. BJU Int, 2003, 92: 672-677.
  • 7Maheshwari PN, Andankar MG, Bansal M. Nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Large-bore or pigtail catheter? J Endourol, 2000, 14: 735-738.
  • 8高小峰,孙颖浩,王林辉,许传亮,高旭,盛夏,侯建国.利多卡因加布比卡因局部麻醉在前列腺穿刺活检术中的应用[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(9):619-622. 被引量:6
  • 9Fernstrom I,Johansson B.Percutaneous pyelolithotomy.A new extraction technique.Scand J Urol Nephrol,1976,10:257-259.
  • 10Stoller,ML,Wolf JS,St Lezin MA,Estimated blood loss and transfusion rates associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy.J Urol,152:1977,1994.

共引文献125

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部