期刊文献+

CHADS_2及CHA_2DS_2-VASc评分对非瓣膜性心房颤动患者左心房/左心耳血栓的预测价值 被引量:7

The predictive value of CHADS_2 and CHA_2DS_2-VASc score in left atrial or left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨CHADS_2及CHA_2DS_2-VASc评分对非瓣膜性心房颤动(房颤)患者左心房(LA)/左心耳(LAA)血栓的预测价值。方法连续纳入于我院行经食管心脏超声(TEE)检查的房颤患者164例,分为血栓组和非血栓组。记录患者既往病史,根据患者一般资料,计算其CHADS_2及CHA_2DS_2-VASc评分,同时收集患者实验室检查及心脏超声检查等指标,比较2组资料的差别。结果164例患者中,32例(19.5%)经TEE检查存在LA/LAA血栓(血栓组),血栓组患者CHADS_2及CHA_2DS_2-VASc评分高于非血栓组(2.1±1.3 vs 1.0±0.9,3.4±1.8 vs 1.9±1.4,P〈0.01);2种评分方法结果,卒中低危、中危(≤1分)患者分别有13例(11.9%)和5例(8.8%)存在LA/LAA血栓;多因素Logistic回归分析显示,CHADS_2评分≥2分(OR=3.735,95%CI:1.508~9.251,P=0.004)和CHA_2DS_2-VASc评分≥2分(OR=5.104,95%CI:1.586~16.425,P=0.006)是心房颤动患者LA/LAA血栓形成的独立危险因素;ROC曲线显示,CHADS_2及CHA_2DS_2-VASc评分预测LA/LAA血栓的曲线下面积分别为0.731(95%CI:0.630~0.832,P〈0.001)和0.742(95%CI:0.640~0.843,P〈0.001)。结论CHADS_2及CHA_2DS_2-VASc评分≥2分是房颤患者LA/LAA血栓形成的独立危险因素,2种评分方法预测LA/LAA血栓价值中等;2种评分方法的卒中低危、中危患者仍有LA/LAA血栓形成,且随着危险分层增高,LA/LAA血栓比例增加。 Objective To investigate the predictive value of CHADS_2 and CHA_2DS_2-VASc score in left atrial (LA) or left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods A total of 164 consecu- tive non-valvular AF patients confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) were included in this study, and were divided into two groups, LA/LAA thrombus group and non LA/LAA thrombus group. The previous history was recorded in two groups of patients. Their CHADS_2 and CHA_2DS_2-VASc scores were calculated based on the general data of two groups. The laboratory examinations and TEE indexes were compared between two gropes. Results Of all patients, the rate of LA/ LAA thrombus was 19.5%. The CHADS_2 and CHA_2DS_2-VASc scores were significantly higher in LA/LAA thrombus group than those of non LA/LAA thrombus group (2.1±1.3 vs 1.0±0.9, 3.4±1.8 vs 1.9± 1.4, P 〈 0.01). There were 13(11.9%) and 5 (8.8%) patients showed LA/LAA thrombus under low-moderate risk in the two score systems, respectively. Multivariate logis- tic regression analysis showed that CHADS2 score ≥2 points(OR=3.735, 95%CI: 1.508-9.251, P=0.004) and HA_2DS_2-VASc score ≥2 points (0R=5.104, 95% CI 1.586-16.425, P=0.006) were independent risk factors of LA/LAA thrombus. ROC curve showed that AUC of CHADS2 and CHA_2DS_2-VASc scores to predict LA/LAA thrombus were 0.731 (95% CI:0.630- 0.832, P 〈 0.001) and 0.742 (95% CI:0.640- 0.843, P 〈 0.001), respectively. Conclusion CHADS_2 and CHA_2DS_2-VASc score 〉12 points are independent risk factors of LA/LAA thrombus in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The pre- dictive values of both score systems are moderate. There are also LA/LAA thrombus in low-moderate risk patients when us- ing the two score systems, and with the increased risk stratification, the rate of LA/LAA thrombus is increased.
出处 《天津医药》 CAS 2015年第3期304-308,共5页 Tianjin Medical Journal
关键词 心房颤动 经食管超声心动描记术 CHADS_2评分 CHA_2DS_2-VASc评分 左心房/左心耳血栓 atrial fibrillation transesophageal echocardiography CHADS_2 score CHA_2DS_2-VASc score LA/LAA thrombus
  • 相关文献

同被引文献74

  • 1张艳,赵燕,吴昆华,庞明杰,范洁.心脏磁共振特征追踪技术在检测成人非梗阻性肥厚型心肌病患者心肌纤维化中的应用[J].中华心力衰竭和心肌病杂志(中英文),2021,5(1):30-34. 被引量:6
  • 2周自强,胡大一,陈捷,张仁汉,李奎宝,赵秀丽.中国心房颤动现状的流行病学研究[J].中华内科杂志,2004,43(7):491-494. 被引量:1401
  • 3黄从新,马长生,杨延宗,黄德嘉,张澍,江洪,杨新春,吴书林,马坚,刘少稳,李莉,曹克将,王方正,陈新.心房颤动:目前的认识和治疗建议(二)[J].中华心律失常学杂志,2006,10(3):167-197. 被引量:269
  • 4Hanon O, Assayag P, Belmin J, et al. Expert consensus of the French Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology and the French Society of Cardiology on the management of atrial fibrillation in elderly people [ J]. Arch Cardiovase Dis, 2013, 106(5) :303-323.
  • 5January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/ HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society [ J ]. Circulation, 2014,130(23), 2071-2104.
  • 6Carom AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, et at. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)[J]. Eur Heart J,2010,31(19) : 2369-429.
  • 7Fuster V, Ryden LE, Cannom DS, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: full rex% a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation) developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm SocietyEJ~. Europaee,2006,8(9) : 651-745.
  • 8Tanaka K,Yamada T,Torii T,et al.Pre-admission CHADS2,CHA2DS2-VASc,and R2CHADS2 scores on severity and functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation[J].J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2015;24(7):1629-35.
  • 9何喆.CHADS2和CHA2DS2-VASc评分对房颤患者经皮冠状动脉支架植入术后血栓栓塞事件预测价值[J].中国循环杂志,2013;28(1):132.
  • 10Xiong Q,Chen S,Senoo K,et al.The CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for predicting ischemic stroke among East Asian patients with atrial fibrillation:A systemic review and meta-analysis[J].Int J Cardiol,2015;195(4):237-42.

引证文献7

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部