摘要
目的：比较髓内固定系统与钉板固定系统治疗股骨粗隆骨折的临床效果。方法选取2010年2月-2013年10月本院收治的股骨粗隆骨折患者74例,随机将患者分为PFN组和DHS组,每组37例,比较两组的骨折愈合程度和手术相关指标。结果与DHS组患者相比,PFN组的优良率明显提高,可达97.30%,手术时间和骨折愈合时间明显缩短,术中出血量明显减少,两组比较,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论髓内固定系统对于股骨粗隆的治疗效果优于钉板固定系统,但两者远期效果的比较则需进一步临床验证。
Objective To compare the clinical effect of intramedullary fixation system and screw-plate fixation system in the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fracture. Methods From February 2010 to October 2013,74 patients with intertrochanteric femoral fracture treated in our hospital were selected and they were randomly divided into the DHS group and PFN group,there were 37 cases in each group.The extent of fracture healing and surgical related indicator of the two groups were compared. Results Compared with the DHS group,the excellent and good rate （97.30%） in the PFN group was obviously improved,the operative time and fracture healing time was shortened significantly,the blood loss was decreased significantly,the difference were significance statistically （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Intramedullary fixation system for the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fracture is superior to screw-plate fixation system,but the compari-sion of long-term effect in the twos further need the clinical verification.
出处
《中国当代医药》
2015年第7期71-72,75,共3页
China Modern Medicine
关键词
髓内固定系统
钉板固定系统
股骨粗隆骨折
Intramedullary fixation system
Screw-plate fixation system
Intertrochanteric femoral fracture
