摘要
随着我国民法典立法步伐的加快,《中国民法典草案建议稿》的问世,标志着加工制度的立法再次提上日程,并在第394条定有明文。在内容的厘定上借鉴了法国民法典、日本民法典以及我国台湾地区民法,秉承了传统意义上的加工制度的基本精神和价值功能。但囿于诸多原因,在内涵、构成要件、加工物的权利归属、补偿责任以及加工规则与相关制度的协调方面仍存在不完善之处,且未能完全反映现代意义上的加工制度的价值取向和应有功能。本文借鉴《欧洲私法的原则、定义与示范规则:欧洲示范民法典草案》〔1〕中的关于加工制度的最新理论成果,从比较法的视角,反思传统意义上的加工制度,尝试对现代意义上的加工制度进行全面剖析,希翼对我国将来民法典中的加工制度的立法提供理论参考。
With the accelerated pace of China's Civil Code legislation, 'Proposals of Scholars on the Draft of the Civil Code of China' came out as a signal that legislation on the processing systemis put on the agenda againand has been expressly provided in article 394. Its content draws on the Civil Cods of France and Japan and Taiwan civil law and keeps the basic spirit, values and functions of processing system in the traditional sense. However, due to various reasons, there is deficient coordination in terms of content, constituent elements, ownership of processed products, compensation liabilities, processing rules and related systems. As a result, it does not fully reflect the value orientation and proper function of the processing system in the modern sense.This paper takes reference from the latest theoretical results about the processing systemin the 'Draft of European Model Civil Code'.From the perspective of Rechtsvergleichung, this paper reviews the processing system in the traditional sense and tries to comprehensively analyze the processing system in the modern sense, and thus hopefully provides a theoretical referencefor the future legislation of processing systemin China's Civil Code.
出处
《中国政法大学学报》
CSSCI
2015年第2期123-136,160,共14页
Journal Of CUPL
