期刊文献+

不同b值对瘤体及瘤周水肿扩散加权成像的影响 被引量:5

Effect of different b-values in tumor and peritumoral edema on diffusion weighted imaging
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不同b值对高级别胶质瘤瘤体及瘤周水肿扩散加权成像(DWI)的影响。方法:25例高级别胶质瘤患者行3种b值DWI检查,比较兴趣区域信号值(SI)、表观扩散系数(ADC)与b值的关系。结果;随着b值的升高,各兴趣区SI、ADC值均降低,SI值在瘤周区域下降最多,ADC值在瘤体区域下降最多。不同b值时瘤体的ADC值与SI值与瘤周差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。b值3000s/mm2时SI、ADC值对瘤体、瘤周鉴别能力最佳,曲线下面积分别为0.90,0.93,敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为88.0%,80.0%,81.5%,87.0%及96.0%,84.0%,87.5%,84.6%。结论:b值为3000s/mm2时对高级别胶质瘤瘤体、瘤周鉴别能力最佳,此结论尚需进一步大样本研究证实。 Objective:To investigate the effect of different b values in high grade glioma and peritumoral edema on diffusion weighted imaging(DWI).Methods:Twenty-five patients with high grade glioma underwent DWI,three different bvalues were applied.The signal intensity(SI)and apparent diffusion coefficients(ADC)values in regions of interests(tumor and peritumoral edema)were measured and compared.Results:The SI and ADC values in all regions of interest decreased with the increasing of b-value.The most significant declination of SI was in regions of peritumoral edema while the ADC value declined most significantly in regions of tumor.The SI and ADC values in the regions of tumor was significantly different from that in the region of peritumoral edema with three different b-values(P〈0.05).The capability of SI and ADC value in differentiating tumor from peritumoral edema was optimal as b-value was 3000s/mm^2.The area under the curve was 0.91,0.93,respectively.The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value were88.0%,80.0%,81.5%,87.0% and 96.0%,84.0%,87.5%,84.6%,respectively.Conclusion:The optimal b-value in differentiating tumor from peritumoral edema was 3000s/mm^2.This conclusion needs to be further evaluated by a large sample study.
出处 《放射学实践》 北大核心 2015年第3期224-227,共4页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 磁共振成像 扩散加权成像 表观扩散系数 胶质瘤 Magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion weighted imaging Apparent diffusion coefficients Glioma
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Glaister J, Cameron A, Wong A, et al. Quantitative investigative a nalysis of tumour separability in the prostate gland using ultra- high b value computed diffusion imaging[J]. Conf Proe IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc,2012,12(20):420-423.
  • 2徐琳,汪登斌.MR扩散加权成像在鉴别乳腺非肿块样强化病变性质方面的价值[J].放射学实践,2014,29(4):454-456. 被引量:15
  • 3Grant KB, Agarwal HK, Shih JH, et al. Comparison of calculated and acquired high h value diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer[J]. Abdom Imaging, 2014,16 (20) : 860-865.
  • 4Manenti G,Nezzo M,Chegai F,et al. DWI of prostate cancer opti real b-Value in clinical practice[J]. Prostate Cancer, 2014,2 (18) : 868 869.
  • 5Jovcevska l,Kocevar N,Komel R. Glioma and glioblastoma-how much do we (not) know[J]. Mol Clin Oncol,2013,1(6) :935-941.
  • 6柏根基,王书中,张辉,郭莉莉.脑胶质瘤ADC值与病理分级的相关性研究[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2009,29(6):882-884. 被引量:3
  • 7Cuddapah VA,Robel S, Watkins S, et al. A neuroeentric perspec tive on glioma invasion [J]. Nat Rev Neurosei, 2014,15 (7) : 455- 465.
  • 8王玉林,刘梦雨,李金锋,张军,孙璐,冯逢,马林.表观弥散系数值在鉴别胶质瘤复发与放射性脑损伤中的价值[J].中国医学科学院学报,2012,34(4):396-400. 被引量:10
  • 9Doskaliyev A, Yamasaki F, Ohtaki M, et al. Lymphomas and glio blastomas differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient evalua ted with high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance ima- ging at 3T[J]. Eur J Radiol,2012,81(2) :339-344.
  • 10Han C,Huang S,Guo J,et al. Use of a high b value for diffusion weighted imaging of peritumoral regions to differentiate high- grade gliomas and solitary metastases[J]. J Magn Reson Ima ging, 2014,15 (10) : 100-105.

二级参考文献71

共引文献73

同被引文献65

  • 1刘玉品,杨小庆.肝占位病变扩散加权成像的图像质量评价[J].实用放射学杂志,2006,22(8):962-966. 被引量:15
  • 2张晓鹏,唐磊,孙应实,李洁,曹崑.胃癌MR扩散加权成像扩散敏感因子的选择及其与常规序列的对照研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(12):1339-1343. 被引量:25
  • 3中华医学会消化内镜学分会,中国抗癌协会肿瘤内镜专业委员会.中国早期食管癌筛查及内镜诊治专家共识意见.胃肠病学2015;04:220-240.
  • 4Ohira M, Silcox J, Haygood D, et al. Electromyography lests in pa tients with implanted cardiac devices are safe regardless of magnet placement[J]. Muscle Nerve, 2013,47 ( 1 ) : 17-22.
  • 5Martinoli C. Imaging of the peripheral nerves[J]. Semin Musculo- skelet Radiol,2010,14(5) :461-462.
  • 6Van der Jagt PK,Dik P, Froeling M, et al. Architectural configura- tion and microstructural properties of the sacral plexus:a diffusion tensor MRI and fiber tractography study[J]. Neuroimage,2012,62 (3):1792- 1799.
  • 7Thawait SK,Chaudhry V, Thawait GK, et al. High resolution MR neurography of diffuse peripheral nerve lesions[J]. AJNR, 2011, 32(8) : 1365-1372.
  • 8Breckwoldt MO, Stock C, Xia A, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging adds diagnostic accuracy in magnetic resonance neurography[J]. Invest Radiol,2015,50(8) :498-504.
  • 9Dewan KAWA, Salama AA, Habashy HMSE, et al. Evaluation of benign and malignant vertebral lesions with diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient measurements[J]. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine,2015,46(2) :423-433.
  • 10Naraghi AM, Awdeh H, Wadhwa V, et al. Diffusion tensor ima ging of peripheral nerves[J]. Semin Musculoskeleta[ Radinl,2015, 19(2) :191 -200.

引证文献5

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部