期刊文献+

经皮穿刺椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折骨不愈合 被引量:8

Percutaneous vertebroplasty in treating osteoporotic vertebral fracture pseudarthrosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经皮穿刺椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折不愈合的临床疗效。方法:54例患者实施该项手术。术前及术后1天、1个月、3个月及12个月分别进行疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale,VAS)及Mac Nab评分。术后第1天进行X线及CT检查。所有评分数据收集后使用SAS软件进行重复测量方差分析。结果:48例患者(共54例,6例失访)获得12个月随访。术后第1天(3.120±1.076),第1个月(2.620±0.874)、第3个月(2.320±0.726)、第12个月(1.920±0.686)VAS评分(F=142.481,P=0.000)和术后第1天(2.940±0.598),第1个月(3.060±0.697)、第3个月(3.210±0.683)、第12个月(3.440±0.501)Mac Nab评分(F=144.207,P=0.000)较术前(VAS=8.490±0.689,Mac Nab=1.270±0.449)明显改善。结论:经皮穿刺椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折不愈合具有良好的疗效。 Objective:To evaluate the clinical outcome of percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP)in treating osteoporotic vertebral fracture pseudarthrosis. Methods:Fifty-four patients underwent PVP were involved. Visual analogue scale(VAS) and Mac Nab scale were recorded before the operation and on 1 d and at 1 month,3 months,12 months after the operation. In addition,X ray and CT examination were conducted on 1 d postoperatively. After data collection,SAS software was used to do ANOVA for repeated measurement.Results:Follow-up(12 months)was achieved in 48 patients out of 54 patients. VAS(F=142.481,P=0.000)and Mac Nab(F=144.207,P=0.000)scores significantly improved on 1 d(VAS=3.120±1.076;Mac Nab=2.940±0.598)and at 1 month(VAS=2.620±0.874;Mac Nab=3.060±0.697),3 months(VAS=2.320±0.726;Mac Nab=3.210±0.683),12 months(VAS=1.920±0.686;Mac Nab=3.440±0.501)after the operation compared with those before the operation(VAS=8.490±0.689,Mac Nab=1.270±0.449). Conclusion:Percutaneous vertebroplasty is effective in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fracture pseudarthrosis.
出处 《重庆医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第2期212-216,共5页 Journal of Chongqing Medical University
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(编号:31000434) 重庆市自然科学基金资助项目(编号:CSTC2011jjzt0063)
关键词 骨质疏松性椎体骨折 骨折不愈合 经皮穿刺椎体成形术 osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture bone nonunion percutaneous vertebroplasty
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Patti S,Rawall S,Singh D,et al.Surgical patterns in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J].Eur Spine J,2013,22(4):.883-891.
  • 2Nieuwenhuijse MJ,van Erkel AR,Dijkstra PD.Percutaneous verte- broplasty for subacute and chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral com- pression fractures can safely be undertaken in the first year after the onset of symptoms[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2012,94(6):815-820.
  • 3Frankel BM, Monroe T, Wang C.Percutaneous vertebral augmenta- tion:an elevation in adjacent-level fracture risk in kyphoplasty as compared with vertebroplasty[J].Spine J, 2007,7 (5) : 575-582.
  • 4Dy CJ,Lamont LE,Ton QV,et al.Sex and gender considerations in male patients with osteoporosis[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011,469 (7) : 1906-1912.
  • 5Lee WS,Sung KH,Jeong HT,et al.Risk factors of developing new symptomatic vertebral compression fractures after percutaneous verte- broplasty in osteoporotic patients[J].Eur Spine J,2006,15 (12) : 1777- 1783.
  • 6Georgy BA.Feasibility, safety and cement leakage in vertebroplasty of osteoporotic and malignant compression fractures using ultra-viscous cement and hydraulic delivery system[J].Pain Physician, 2012, 15 (3): 223-228.
  • 7Liu J,Li X,Tang D,et al.Comparing pain reduction following ver- tebroplasty and conservative treatment for osteoporotie vertebral com- pression fractures:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Pain Physician, 20 l 3,16 ( 5 ) : 455-464.
  • 8DePalma MJ, Ketchum JM, Frankel BM, et al.Percutaneous verte- broplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the nona- genarians:a prospective study evaluating pain reduction and new symp- tomatic fracture rate[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ,2011,36(4) :277-282.
  • 9Nieuwenhuijse M J, van Erkel AR, Dijkstra PD.Percutaneous ver- tebroplasty in very severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: feasible and beneficial[J].J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2011,22 (7) : 1017- 1023.
  • 10Purl T,Fmst ML,Curran KM,et al.Differences in regional bone metabolism at the spine and hip:a quantitative study using (18)F-flu- oride positron emission tomography [ J]. Osteoporos Int, 2013,24 ( 2 ) : 633-639.

二级参考文献34

  • 1毛克亚,郝立波,唐佩福,王继芳,王岩,卢世璧,卢世琳,贺大为.碳酸化羟基磷灰石水泥修复骨缺损的实验研究[J].生物医学工程与临床,2004,8(3):129-132. 被引量:17
  • 2杨惠林,牛国旗,王根林,陈亮,陆俭,赵刘军,顾晓晖,唐天驷.椎体后凸成形术治疗周壁破损的骨质疏松性椎体骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(3):165-169. 被引量:94
  • 3Sugita M, Watanabe N, Mikami Y, et al. Classification of vertebral compression fractures in the osteoporotic spine. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2005, 18(4): 376-381.
  • 4Schofer MD, Ere T, Timmesfeld N, et al. Comparison of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in the treatment of fresh vertebral compression fractures. Arch Otop Trauma Surg, 2009, 129( 10 ): 1391-1399.
  • 5Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, et al. Vertevral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. ] Bone Miner Res, 1993, 8(9): 1137-1148.
  • 6Krauss M, Hirschfelder H, Tomandl B, et al. Kyphosis reduction and the rate of cement leaks after vertebroplasty of intravertebral clefts. Eur Radiol, 2006, 16(5): 1015-1021.
  • 7Morlock G, Arlet J, Mazieres B, et al. Intravertebral vacuum cleft and ischemic collapse of the vertebral body//Arlet J, Mazieres B. Bone Circulation and Bone Necrosis. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1990: 100-104.
  • 8Sarli M, Perez Manghi FC, Gallo R, et al. The vacuum cleft sign: an uncommon radiological sign. Osteoporos Int, 2005, 16(10): 1210-1214.
  • 9Hashidate H, Kamimura M, Nakagawa H, et al. Pseudoarthrosis of vertebral fracture: radiographic and characteristic clinical features and natural history. J Orthop Sci, 2006, 11(1): 28-33.
  • 10Stallenberg B, Madani A, Burny F, et al. The vacuum phenomenon: a CT sign of nonunited fracture. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2001, 176(5): 1161-1164.

共引文献22

同被引文献87

引证文献8

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部