摘要
在传统的辩论主义下,诉讼过程有如竞技场,无法要求对立的当事人互负保护关照义务。但是,基于现代诉讼理念的协同主义要求对方当事人负担案件事实解明义务。然而,这并不意味着在原则上毫无限制地肯定对方当事人在任何状况下均有解明案件事实的必要。因此,案件事实解明义务的产生应当具备一定的法律要件。当一方当事人无正当理由违反案件事实解明义务时,法院可以在自由心证的基础上适用拟制自认、不利推定、降低证明标准和转换证明责任等法律效果。
Following the traditional doctrine of debate, the litigation is so much like an arena that it can not expect two opposite parties to mutually perform protective duties for each other. Nevertheless, doctrine of cooperation based on the modern concept of litigation requires the adversary to take shoulder the disclosure obligation of case facts. However, it doesn＇t mean that in principle the concept supposes the adversary to have the necessity to disclose case facts without restraints. Therefore, this obligation should be provided with some certain legal requirements. When a party violates this obligation without unjustified reasons, the court should apply the law effects such as implied admission, adverse presumption, reduction of standard of proof and conversion of burden of proof and so on.
出处
《南通大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第2期49-55,共7页
Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition
基金
中国法学会2013年度部级课题(CLS(2013)D204)
西南政法大学2013年度青年教师学术创新团队资助项目(XZQNCXTD2013-07)
关键词
民事诉讼
辩论主义
协同主义
案件事实解明义务
civil action
doctrine of debate
doctrine of cooperation
disclosure obligation of case facts
