期刊文献+

双边投资协定中的劳工保护条款研究 被引量:3

Labor Protection Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaty
原文传递
导出
摘要 劳工保护问题并不是双边投资协定的传统议题之一,然而晚近双边投资协定纷纷纳入劳工保护条款。就劳工保护投资争端而言,虽然存在仲裁实践,但劳工保护涉及公共利益,明确劳工保护投资争端的不可仲裁性更为恰当。中国在未来的缔约实践中不应一概排斥劳工保护新议题,而应选择审慎规定缔约方劳工保护义务,强调缔约方劳工事项的规制权,明确劳工保护投资争端的不可仲裁性,最终达到投资者利益和东道国权益的平衡保护。 The issue of labor protection is not one of the traditional items of BIT, but a provision put into it in recent years. Though several cases relating to labor protection exist in arbitration practices, considering labor protection involving public interests, it is proper to clearly stipulate the unarbitrability of the international investment disputes relating to labor protection. China should stipulate the labor protection clause in its practice of signing future investment treaty, impose reasonable commitments and preserve the contracting parties' regulatory power in labor matters to achieve the goal of balancing investor protection and host country interests.
作者 汪玮敏
机构地区 安徽大学法学院
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期76-86,共11页 International Economics and Trade Research
基金 国家社科基金青年项目(12CFX102) 安徽大学博士科研启动经费项目
关键词 双边投资协定 劳工保护 可仲裁性 bilateral investment treaty labor protection arbitrability
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献89

  • 1刘小明.跨国公司在华环境污染问题探析[J].山东干部函授大学学报,2008(2):42-43. 被引量:5
  • 2余劲松.外资的公平与公正待遇问题研究——由NAFTA的实践产生的几点思考[J].法商研究,2005,22(6):41-48. 被引量:39
  • 3何志鹏.人的回归:个人国际法上地位之审视[J].法学评论,2006,24(3):56-63. 被引量:25
  • 4余劲松,詹晓宁.国际投资协定的近期发展及对中国的影响[J].法学家,2006(3):154-160. 被引量:21
  • 5LG&E Energy Corp. et al. v The Republic of Argentina. ICSID ease no. ARB/02/1 (2006) ;Continental Casualty Company v The Argentine Republic. ICSID case no. ARB/O3/gA, award of 5 September 2008.
  • 6See Anthea Roberts, Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States, 104 Am. J. Int' l. L. 179 (2010).
  • 7See William W. Burke -White & Andreas yon Stadan, Investment Protection in Extraordinary Time: The Interpretation and Application of Nort - Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties, 48 Va. J. Int' l L. (2008) 307, 376 - 81.
  • 8Id., 320-324,.
  • 9CMS Gas Transmission Company v The Argentine Republic, ICSID case no. ARB/01/08, 12) (annulment proceeding). Decision of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic, 25 September 2007, para. 128 - 136.
  • 10Sempra Energy International v The Argentine Republic. ICSID case no. ARB/02/16 ( Annulment Proceeding), Decision on the Argentine Re- public' s Request for Annulment of the Award, 29 June 2010.

引证文献3

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部