摘要
我国法院审理隐私权案件较少,现有隐私权案件多被归为人格权纠纷案和物权纠纷案案由下。人格权纠纷案件中隐私权案件的分布与我国隐私权制度发展正相关,物权纠纷案件中隐私权案件多集中于相邻关系案件。经济发达地区人们可能更倾向于采取诉讼方式处理隐私权纠纷。《侵权责任法》颁布后,隐私权案件增长态势与法院审理相关案件时援引该法第2条有一定关系。法院与当事人对隐私权理解出现偏差后,当事人上诉往往因法院之间对隐私权理解相同而维持原判。起诉到法院的隐私权纠纷案件,当事人极少采取和解方式结案。
The empirical statistics prove that exist little right to privacy judged by the court,most of which classified as the cause of action of personality and property. The distribution of right to privacy in personality positively correlates with China＇s developing privacy guarantee system and those in property cases are focused on the neighboring relations. People in developed area prefer taking action to handle the invasion of privacy more than those in developing areas. After the Law of Torts Liability enacted the growth of privacy case is related with the judge＇s invoking Article 2 of this law to try involved cases. Misapprehension about right to privacy existed between the court and the party,the party＇s appeal is often rejected owning to the common understanding about privacy among the courts and the appellate courts will uphold the decision. The parties do not compromise with each other.
出处
《广播电视大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2015年第1期43-48,共6页
Journal of Radio & TV University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)
基金
国家社科规划一般项目"权利冲突研究:基于法经济学视角"
项目编号:12BFX010
新型城镇化背景下的农村土地流转:现实困境与制度创新的阶段性研究成果
批准号:14BFXJ01
关键词
隐私权
实证研究
司法保护
侵权责任法
解决方式
Right to privacy
Empirical study
Legislative protection
Tort Law
Dispute resolution
