期刊文献+

邻避冲突主体间认知差异评估框架与建构方法——基于模糊德尔菲法的综合运用 被引量:12

Assessment Framework and Construction Methods on NIMBY Cognitive Differences among the Main Conflict Subjects:Based on Using Fuzzy Delphi Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 邻避冲突行为主体间的认知差异不仅影响周边民众的行为意向,还直接影响其行为动作。采用模糊德尔菲法,以公众参与、利益补偿、信息公开和风险防范为研究基础,建构邻避冲突行为主体间认知差异评估框架。该评估框架能有效弥补因语义认知差异而产生的评估缺陷,较为完整地表达专家意见,使评估结果更具客观性和稳定性,为揭示不同行为主体对邻避冲突应对策略上的认知态度、寻求不同化解策略在周边民众的真实反映奠定了基础。 NIMBY conflicts are triggered by inappropriate compensation or poor communication superficially,but deep down they are caused by cognitive bias among government officials,experts,and the public involved in the policy. This bias not only affects surrounding publics' behavioral intentions but also their direct actions. Existing literature mainly focuses on the origin,causes and coping strategies of NIMBY conflicts with little emphasis on the cognitive differences among the different conflict subjects. With the application of fuzzy Delphi method to construct a set of assessment framework,the study tries to reveal the different subjects' attitudes on NIMBY cognitive strategies and seek true reflection of the surrounding publics.
作者 杨拓
出处 《北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第2期24-30,共7页 Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics:Social Sciences edition Edition
基金 国家社会科学基金重大资助项目(11&ZD173) 国家社会科学基金重点资助项目(11AGL009)
关键词 邻避设施 风险评估 认知差异 专家评判 模糊德尔菲法 NIMBY risk assessment cognitive differences expert judgment Fuzzy Delphi Method
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献21

  • 1黄德镛,胡运权.群体决策及其特点[J].管理科学,1997,13(4):44-46. 被引量:7
  • 2EB格涅钦科 徐维新译.可靠性数学理论问题[M].兵器工业出版社,1990..
  • 3王福保.概率论及数理统计[M].上海:同济大学出版社,1988..
  • 4易靖.六里屯垃圾焚烧厂确定被废--将由苏家坨镇大工村项目取代,计划2012年底建成[N】.京华时报,2011-01-20.
  • 5R·爱德华·弗里曼.战略管理:利益相关者的方法[M].上海:上海译文出版社.2006.37-39;58;133-159.
  • 6Can M.Alpaslan, Sandy E.Green, Lan L.Mitroff Corporate Governance in the Context of Crises: Towards a Stakeholder Theory of Crisis Management[J]. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2009, (17):;38-49.
  • 7胡建一,杨敏等.公共项目社会稳定风险分析与评估概论[M].上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2011.58;101;136;157.
  • 8John Clayton Thomas, Theodore H.Poister. Thinking about Stakeholders of Public Agencies: The Georgia Department of Transportation Stakeholder Audit[J].Public Organization Review, 2009, (9):67-82.
  • 9Mark S.Reed, Anil Graves et aI.Whors In and Why?. A Typology of Stakeholder Analysis Methods for Natural Resource Management[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, (90): 1933-1949.
  • 10Emerson W.Mainardes, Helen Alves, Mario Raposo. Stakeholder Theory: Issues to Resolve[J]. Management Decision, 2011, (49):226-252.

共引文献323

同被引文献128

引证文献12

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部