期刊文献+

学术讲座笔记质量的预测效力与特征研究 被引量:5

Analyzing Predictive Force and Construct Features of Lecture Note-taking Quality
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文基于Song的笔记量化理论及Bachman的测试馈入语理论,通过2013年英语专业八级考试讲座任务,分析了学术讲座笔记质量的预测效力和特征。结论如下:(1)笔记质量可以解释超过50%的讲座任务得分,具有较好的预测效力;(2)笔记的信息点记录情况受馈入语的信息类型和语境类型影响呈现高低差异;(3)笔记质量受馈入语的信息分布密度影响呈现"高-低-高"走势。研究结果揭示了笔记质量的重要性及复杂性。 Based on Song 's note quantification theory and Bachman's test input theory,this study aims to analyze the predictive force and construct features of note-taking quality in academic lecture.The conclusions are as follow s:(1)note-taking quality explains more than 50% of the minilecture task score,indicating satisfactory predictive force;(2) note-taking quality varies at the information unit level due to different types of information and contexts of test input;(3) note-taking quality displays a "high-low-high"trend under the influence of information distribution density of test input.The results reveal the importance and complexity of note-taking quality.
作者 泰中华
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期52-57,共6页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
基金 辽宁省教育科学"十二五"规划项目"英语专业PBL教学体系构建研究"(项目编号:JG14DB108) 大连外国语大学教学改革项目"基于PBL理论的英语专业本科阶段研究性学习课程研究"(项目编号:2013Y0226)的阶段性成果
关键词 笔记质量 预测效力 学术讲座 特征 note-taking quality predictive force academic lecture construct features
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Alderson, J. 2000. Assessing Reading [ M ]. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press.
  • 2Anderson, T. & B. Armbruster. 1991. The value of taking notes during lecturesC A ]. In R. Flippo &D. Caverly ( eds. ). Teaching Reading and Stud.)' Strategies at the College Level [ C ]. Newark : International Reading Association.
  • 3Bachman ,L. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing [ M ]. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
  • 4Bryman, A. & D. Cramer. 1997. Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS for Windows[ M]. London : Routledge.
  • 5Carrell,P. 2007. Notetaking Strategies and Their Relationship to Performance on Listening Comprehension and Communicative Assessment Tasks[ M ]. Princeton :Educational Testing Service.
  • 6Carrell, P. , P. Dunkel & P. MoUaun. 2004. The effects of no-tetaking,lecture length, and topic on a computer-based test of ESL listening comprehension [ J ]. Applied Language Learn- ing, (14) .83 - 105.
  • 7Dunkel,P. & S. Davy. 1989. The heuristics of lecture notetak- ing: Perceptions of American & international students regard- ing the value &practice of notetaking[ J]. English for Specific Purposes, ( 1 ) :33 -50.
  • 8Dunkel ,P. , S. Mishra & D. Berliner. 1989. Effects of notetak- ing, memory, and language proficiency on lecture learning for native and nonnative speakers of English [ J ]. TESOL Quar- terly, (3) :543 -549.
  • 9Hale,G. &R. Courtney. 1994. The effect of notetaking on lis- tening comprehension in the TOEFL [ J ]. Language Testing, (11) :29 -47.
  • 10Hughes, C. & S. Suritsky. 1994. Note-taking skills of univer- sity students with and without disabilities [ J ]. Journal of Learning Disabilities, ( 1 ) :7 - 12.

二级参考文献105

共引文献80

同被引文献117

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部