期刊文献+

诱导表达护理方法对胃镜检查患者焦虑状态的影响 被引量:9

Influence of induced expression nursing method on anxiety in gastroscopy patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:研究诱导表达护理方法对缓解胃镜检查患者焦虑情绪与痛苦体验的作用。方法选择2012年9—11月进行胃镜检查的患者121例,按照随机数字表法随机分为对照组60例与干预组61例,通过生理指标测定、焦虑程度评分、疼痛耐受程度分级研究诱导表达护理方法对受检查心理状态的影响。结果胃镜检查前干预组患者收缩压、舒张压和心率分别为(121.64±11.49),(82.72±15.33)mmHg,(73.53±13.68)次/min,优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t值分别为4.32,3.25,5.13;P〈0.05)。预约时两组患者SAS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),检查前干预组 SAS评分为(52.14±2.79)分,低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=2.96,P〈0.05)。检查后干预组疼痛耐受程度分级优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论诱导表达护理方法对于缓解胃镜检查者检查前的焦虑情绪、检查时的疼痛体验具有较为明显的改善作用。 Objective To research the effect of the induced expression nursing method on anxiety and pain experience in gastroscopy patients. Methods A total of 121 patients from September to November 2012 were selected and randomly divided into the control group ( 60 patients ) and the intervention group (61 patients). The physiological indicators, anxiety score, and pain tolerance were measured and compared between the two groups. Results The systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate in the intervention group before gastroscopy were (121.64 ±11.49), (82.72 ±15.33)mmHg and (73.53 ±13.68) times/min,which were significantly better than those of the control group (t=4. 32, 3. 25, 5. 13, respectively;P〈0. 05). There was no significant difference in SAS scores when making the test reservation between the two groups (P〉0. 05). The SAS scores in the intervention group before gastroscopy was (52. 14 ± 2. 79), which was significantly lower than that of the control group (t=2. 96,P〈0. 05). After gastroscopy, the pain tolerance grading was significantly better than that of the control group (P〈0. 05). Conclusions The induced expression nursing method can effectively reduce the patients′anxiety and pain experience to gastroscopy.
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2015年第9期1016-1019,共4页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词 胃镜检查 焦虑 诱导表达护理方法 Gastroscopy Anxiety Induced expression nursing method
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Kao SH, Hsu LL, Hsieh SI, et al. The effects of two educational interventions on knowledge and competence of nurses with regard to conveying gastroscopy-related information to patients [ J ]. J A dv Nurs ,2013,69 (4) :793-804.
  • 2Okten RS,Kacar S,Kucukay F,et al. Gastric subepithelial masses: Evaluation of multidetector CT (muhiplanar reconstruction and virtual gastroscopy) versus endoscopic ultrasonography [ J ]. Abdom Imping,2012,37 (4) :519-530.
  • 3李海亚,戴满霞.健康教育干预对降低胃镜检查患者术前焦虑的价值[J].中国基层医药,2014,21(7):1104-1105. 被引量:6
  • 4Marco M, Scardapane A, Telegrafo M, et al. Differential diagnosis between benign and malignant ulcers: 320-row CT virtual gastroscopy [ J ]. Abdom Imaging, 2012, 37 ( 6 ) : 1066- 1073.
  • 5Jiang Z, Wu X, Liu Y, et al. Reflux-preventing face mask designed for painless gastroscopy [ J ]. J Clin Anesth, 2012,24 (5) :432.
  • 6Meegan J, Sidor IF, Field C, et al. Endoscopic evaluation and biopsy collection of the gastrointestinal tract in the green moray eel (Gymnotborax funebris ): application in a case of chronic regurgitation with gastric mucus gland hyperplasia [ J ]. J Zoo and Wildl Med ,2012,43 (3) :615-620.
  • 7Sun D, Hu W, Wu W, et al. Design of the image-guided biopsy marking system for gastroscopy [ J]. J Med Syst,2012,36 (5) : 2909-2920.
  • 8Kim JH, Eun HW, Hong SS, et al. Gastric cancer detection using MDCT compared with 2D axial CT: diagnostic accuracy of three different reconstruction techniques [ J ]. Abdom Imaging, 2012,37 (4) :541-548.
  • 9Oksanen A, Veijola L, Korudanova B, et al. Role of earlier gastroseopy in predicting findings on repeat gastroscopy in a population with a low H. pylorl prevalence [ J ]. Stand J Gastroenterol, 2008,43 ( 9 ) : 1044-1049.
  • 10Lin LS, Kayasuga Y, Shimohata N, et al. Lyophilized aspirin with trehalose may decrease the incidence of gastric injuries in healthy dogs[ J]. J Vet Med Sci,2012,74( 11 ) : 1511-1516.

二级参考文献16

共引文献5

同被引文献57

引证文献9

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部