期刊文献+

彩超评分、血流阻力指数及CA125在卵巢肿瘤良恶性鉴别诊断中的意义 被引量:21

Study on significance of ultrasound scoring,vascular resistance indexes and serum level of CA125 in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探析彩色多普勒超声评分和血流阻力指数(RI)结合肿瘤标记物CA125在良、恶性卵巢肿瘤中的临床诊断价值。方法分析2009年4月至2014年4月接受治疗的99例卵巢肿瘤患者的临床资料。根据卵巢肿瘤患者病情的严重程度将入选者分为良性组(61例)和恶性组(38例)。比较两组患者的年龄构成、超声表现、血流例数以及Finkler评分、RI、CA125的检查结果。结果两组患者的年龄构成差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);良性患者的超声表现主要为囊性回声,而恶性患者主要是囊实性回声,两组超声表现间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);恶性组的血流信号患者比率高于良性组,差异也有统计学意义(P<0.01)。两组患者的Finkler评分、RI以及CA125的检查结果均具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。良性组患者的Finkler评分和CA125值均比恶性组低,而RI值比恶性组高。联合应用RI、Finkler评分、CA125诊断卵巢肿瘤患者的的敏感度、阴性预测值均比任何独立的检测法高。结论 RI、Finkler超声评分和CA125在良性组和恶性组间存在明显差异,且联合应用三种方法对诊断良、恶性卵巢肿瘤的特异度及敏感度均较高。 Objective This retrospective study was aimed to analyze the clinical diagnostic value of color Doppler ultrasonography scoring,resistance index( RI) and tumor marker CA125 in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Methods The clinical data of 99 patients with ovarian tumors received treatment in this hospital during 2009 to 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into two groups according to the severity of illness,61 patients in benign group and 38 patients in malignant group. The age structure,ultrasonic features,blood flow,Finkler ultrasound scores,RI and serum level of CA125 were compared between these 2 groups. Results The difference in age structure of patients in these two groups was statistically significant. The ultrasonic features of patients in benign group were mainly cystic echoes,and those in malignant group were mainly cystic and solid echoes. The difference in ultrasonic features between these two groups was statistically significant. The difference in signals of blood flow between these two groups was statistically significant. The difference in results of Finkler ultrasound scores,RI and level of CA125 between these two groups was all statistically significant. The Finkler ultrasound scores and level of CA125 in patients of benign group were both lower than those of patients in malignant group,but RI was higher than that of malignant group. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of combined application of RI,Finkler scores and level of CA125 in diagnosing patients with ovarian tumors were higher than any independent detection method. Conclusion The difference in Finkler ultrasound scores,RI and level of CA125 between these two groups is significant. The specificity and sensitivity of combined application of RI,Finkler scores and serum level of CA125 in differential diagnosis of patients with ovarian tumors are high.
出处 《临床和实验医学杂志》 2015年第7期595-598,共4页 Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
关键词 卵巢肿瘤 Finkler超声评分 CA125 RI Ovarian tumor The Finkler ultrasound scoring CA125 Resistance Index
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Liu JF, Kindelberger D, Doyle C, et al. Predictive value of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in newly- diagnosed and recurrent ovarian cancer patients[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2013,131(2) :352 -356.
  • 2Obermayr E, Castillo - Tong DC, Pils D, et al. Molecular characteriza- tion of circulating tumor cells in patients with ovarian cancer improves their prognostic significance - a study of the OVCAD consortium [ J ]. Gynecol Oncol, 2013,128 ( 1 ) : 15 - 21.
  • 3Kaijser J, Bourne T, Valentin L, et al. Improving strategies for diagno- sing ovarian cancer: a summary of the International Ovarian Tumor Anal- ysis (IOTA) studies[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013,41 (1):9 - 20.
  • 4Lawicki S, Gacuta - Szumarska E, Bedkowska GE, et al. Hematopoiet- ic cytokines as tumor mm'kers in gynecological malignancies. A multiva- riate analysis in epithelial ovarian cancer patients [ J ]. Growth Factors, 2012,30(6) :357 -366.
  • 5Sang M, Wu X, Fan X, et al. Multiple MAGE - A genes as surveil- lance marker for the detection of circulating tumor cells in patients with ovarian cancer[ J]. Biomarkers, 2014,19( 1 ) :34 -42.
  • 6Alanbay I, Akturk E, Coksuer H, et al. Comparison of risk of malig- nancy index (RMI), CA125, CA 19-9, ultrasound score, and meno- pausal status in borderline ovarian tumor [ J ]. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2012,28(6) :478 -482.
  • 7Illueca C, Machado I, Gareia A, et al. Uncommon vascular tumor of the ovary. Primary ovarian epithelioid hemangioendothelioma or vascular sarcomatous transformation in ovarian germ cell tumor[ J] ? Arch Gyne- col Obstet, 2011,284(6) :1589 - 1591.
  • 8Park CW, Jo Y, Jo EJ. Enhancement of ovarian tumor classification by improved reproducibility in matrix time - of - flight mass spectrometry chem, 2013,443( 1 ) :58 -65.
  • 9Guerriero S, Alcazar JL, Pascual MA, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of metastatic ovarian cancer is related to origin of primary tumor[ J]. Ultra- sound Obstet Gynecol, 2012,39(5) :581 -586.
  • 10Fago - Olsen CL, Hakansson F, Antonsen SL, et al. Diagnostic accura- cy of risk of malignancy index in predicting complete tumor removal at primary debulking surgery for ovarian cancer patients [ J 1. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2013,92(6) :721 -726.

同被引文献205

  • 1唐华,郭瑞君,赵鸿雁,李楠,郝磐石,廉锦燕.盆腔肿物彩色多普勒超声误诊分析[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2011,8(9):2001-2011. 被引量:12
  • 2任义敏,李国杰.彩色多普勒超声诊断卵巢肿瘤的价值[J].中国临床保健杂志,2005,8(4):322-323. 被引量:3
  • 3马卓娅,汤华,李欣,刘民,吴海东,王晶.MicroRNA在6种肿瘤细胞中的表达差异[J].中国肿瘤生物治疗杂志,2007,14(3):254-258. 被引量:8
  • 4Terzic M, Dotlic J, Bmdusic N, et al. Histopathological diagnoses of adnexal masses: which parameters are relevant in preoperative assess- ment[J]. Ginekol Pol, 2013,84(8) :700 -708.
  • 5Elfayomy AK, E1 Tarhouny SA. Ovarian volume assessment in relation to histologic findings and sex hormone levels in women with postmenopa- usal bleeding and thickened endometrium [ J ]. Ann Sandi Med, 2012, 32(6) :588 -592.
  • 6Chen SS? Michael A,Butler-Manuel SA.Advances in the treatment of ovarian cancer:a potential role of antiinflammatory phytochemicals [J].Discov Med,2012,13(68):7-17.
  • 7Van Gorp T,Cadron ItDespierre E,et al.HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer:prospective validation of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm[J].Br J Cancer,2011,104(5):863-870.
  • 8Arun-Muthuvel V?Jaya V.Pre-operative evaluation of ovarian tumors by risk of malignancy index,CAl25 and ultrasound [J].Asian Pac J Cancer Prev,2014,15(6):2929-2932.
  • 9Hartman CA,Juliato CR,Sarian LO,et al.Ultrasound criteria and CA 125 as predictive variables of ovarian cancer in women with adnexal tumors[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2012,40(3):360-366.
  • 10Karadag B,Kocak M,Kayikcioglu F,et al.Risk for malignant and borderline ovarian neoplasms following basic preoperative evaluation by ultrasonography?CA125 level and age[J].Asian Pac J Cancer Prev,2014,15(19):8489-8493.

引证文献21

二级引证文献141

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部