期刊文献+

对应分析在CFIT事故致因研究中的应用 被引量:8

CFIT accident causation study based on correspondence analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 为揭示可控飞行撞地(CFIT)事故致因规律,根据Reason-SHEL模型得出的10个CFIT事故致因因子,分析从飞行安全基金会数据库中整理出的2006—2011年间40起CFIT事故。在此基础上建立CFIT事故年份-成因列联表,再利用SPSS软件对表格进行对应分析。将事故成因和年份同时反映在二维散点图中,实现数据可视化。最后对图形进行向量、圆心接近点以及区域化等3项分析。根据结果得出,CFIT事故的主成因是人因操作和外界环境;随着年份增加,飞行员状态(药物/疲劳、经验不足)对造成CFIT事故的重要性越来越明显;不同年份有不同的重要致因因子。 To reveal the regularity in CFIT accident causes, 40 accident-investigating reports from 2006 to 2011 in the Flight Safety Foundation database were analyzed with 10 CFIT accident cause factors derived from Reason-SHEL model. On the basis of these analyses, a CFIT accident sample-cause contingency table was established, then a two-dimensional scatter plot was got by using SPSS software to deal with the table by the way of correspondence analysis. Both accident cause and occurrence year were plotted on a two-dimensional scatter point graph, and data visualization was realized. For the graph, vector analysis, analysis of the points closing to the center and regionalism were carried out. According to the results of analysis, the main causes of CFIT accident are operation and external environment; with the year increased, the pilots'states (drug and/or fatigue, lack of experience) show more and more obvious impor- tance to causing CFIT accidents; and CFIT contributing factors are different in different years.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第2期95-100,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(61304207 U1333112) 民航局科技项目(MHRD201238)
关键词 可控飞行撞地(CFIT) 对应分析 Reason—SHEL模型 列联表 统计产品与服务解决方案(SPSS) controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) correspondence analysis Reason-SHEL model contingency table statistical product and service solutions(SPSS)
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Kim Trethewey. Information to states on approach and landing accident reduction (ALAR) and controlled flight into ter- rain (CFIT) prevention training[C1. Cooperative Development of Operational Safety & Continuing Airworthiness Pre- game, 2013 : 1 - 5.
  • 2杜红兵,王雪莉.基于贝叶斯网络的可控飞行撞地事故原因分析方法[J].安全与环境学报,2009,9(5):136-139. 被引量:9
  • 3张晓全,吴贵锋.功能共振事故模型在可控飞行撞地事故分析中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(4):65-70. 被引量:21
  • 4李冬宾,孙瑞山.人为因素分析系统(HFACS)及实例分析[J].中国民航大学学报,2005,23(z1):106-108. 被引量:8
  • 5汪磊,孙瑞山.可控飞行撞地的事故树分析[c].第六届全国交通运输领域青年学术会议,2005:1120-1124.
  • 6Chen Ken. CFIT risk assessment model destination airport based on fussy linguisticr J. Information Technology Journal, 2013, 12 (14) :2 985 -2 989.
  • 7Jason Lee. Modeling terrain awareness and warning systems for airspace and procedure designr CJ. 31s' Digital Avionics Systems Conferenc, 2012 : 2B2/1 - 2B2/9.
  • 8Alex Smith, Rick Cassell, Y Eric Yang, et al. Feasiblitity demonstration of an aircraft performance risk assessment model[C-]. Digital Avionics Systems Coference , 2000:4IM/1 -glM/8.
  • 9Matthew L Bolton, Ellen J Bass, James R Comstock. A toolset to support the development of spatial and temporal judgment experiments for synthetic vision systemsC-]. Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium , 2006:55 -60.
  • 10Barry C Breen. Controlled.flight into terrain and the enhanced ground proximity warning system[-JJ. Aerospace and Electronic System Magazine, IEEE, 1999, 14(1) : 19 - 24.

二级参考文献47

  • 1王广彦,马志军,胡起伟.基于贝叶斯网络的故障树分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(6):78-83. 被引量:98
  • 2郑恒,徐连胜,韦健.基于贝叶斯网络的港口生产安全评价方法[J].水运工程,2007(4):23-27. 被引量:5
  • 3王永刚,张朋鹏.基于组织因素的航空事故致因因素评价[J].中国民航飞行学院学报,2007,18(4):9-12. 被引量:3
  • 4Fwdia Netjasov, Milan Janic. A review of research on risk and safety modelling in civil aviation[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management ,2008,14 : 213 - 220
  • 5Rachael P. E Gordon. The contribution of human factors to accidents in the offshore oil industry[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety,1998,61 : 95 - 108
  • 6R. Gordon, R. Flin, K. Mearns. Designing and evaluating a human factors investigation tool (HFIT) for accident analysis[J]. Safety Science,2005,43:147 - 171
  • 7Melissa T. Baysari, Andrew S. Mclntosh, John R. Wilson . Understanding the human factors contribution to railway accidents and incidents in Australia[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2008,40:1 750 -1 757
  • 8Andrew W. Elbardissi, Douglas A. Wiegmann, Joseph A. Dearani, et al. Application of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Methodology to the Cardiovascular Surgery Operating Room[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2007,83: 1 412 - 1 419
  • 9Wen-chin Li, Don Harris, Chung-San Yu. Routes to failure: Analysis of 41 civil aviation accidents from the Republic of China using the human factors analysis and classification system [J].Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2008,40: 426 - 434
  • 10Kongtogiannis, T. , Malakis, S. , A proactive approach to human error detection and identification in aviation and air traffic control[J].Safety Science ,2008 ,doi: 10. 1016/j. ssci ,2008.09.007

共引文献88

同被引文献62

引证文献8

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部