摘要
贫困的缓解是社会正义问题的关键。从为何研究贫困、如何辨别与对治贫困等问题的角度,我们重新解读了罗尔斯的平等观、基本善理念,并将基本善理念与森研究贫困的可行能力方法进行比较,指出可行能力方法并不构成对基本善理念的根本性修正,基本善理念和可行能力方法相得益彰、相互补充,共同构成对治贫困之道。
Lessening poverty is crucial to social justice. The paper attempts to reinterpret Rawlsian conception of equality and i- dea of primary goods in terms with why to study poverty and how to discern the degrees of poverty and how to tackle with poverty. Comparing Rawlsian idea with Sen＇ s approach of capabilities, we argue that Sen＇ s approach does not constitute a radical chal- lenge to the idea of primary goods and these two approaches complementarily form the fundamental way of lessening poverty.
出处
《集美大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2015年第2期32-39,共8页
Journal of Jimei University：Philosophy and Social Sciences
基金
国家社科基金青年项目(13CZX073)
华中科技大学教改项目(S0725)
关键词
罗尔斯
基本善
森
可行能力
贫困
John Rawls
primary goods
Amartya Sen
capabilities
poverty
