期刊文献+

基于用地规划的大型污染场地健康风险评估 被引量:23

Risk Assessment Based on Planning Scenarios for a Large-Scale Contaminated Site
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以某焦化类大型污染场地苯污染土壤为例,针对S1(单一用地)、S2(多种用地)、S3(考虑建筑设计)3种暴露情景,分析不同情景下场地土壤中苯污染的暴露途径并进行健康风险评估.S1情景下的苯致癌风险为9.2×10-5.在S2情景下,规划的5个分区中仅E区(居住用地)苯的致癌风险(4.3×10-4)高于可接受水平(1.0×10-6),考虑到各功能区累积致癌风险,则E区高污染可导致其他4个功能区〔A区(商业用地)、B区(城市绿地)、C区(居住用地)、D区(商业用地)〕的累积致癌风险(分别为6.5×10-6、2.2×10-6、7.3×10-6、2.2×10-5)均高于可接受水平,表明单一用地会低估污染物聚集区的风险.在S3情景下,A、B、C区土壤中苯的致癌风险(分别为1.2×10-7、2.7×10-7、2.5×10-7)均未超过可接受致癌风险水平;D区由于污染土壤被完全清除,不存在健康风险;E区开发后由剩余土壤产生的苯致癌风险为2.7×10-5,D区受E区影响产生的累积致癌风险(1.5×10-6)高于可接受水平.进一步分析表明,场地的用地规划与建筑设计等因素将影响风险评估中关键参数(包括污染源浓度、水文地质参数、暴露参数、受体参数等)的取值,从而影响风险评估结果;此外,各功能区之间的风险影响也不容忽视.对于大型污染场地,结合用地规划进行暴露情景分析与风险评估更为科学合理. Exposure analysis and health risk assessment based on different scenarios (unrestricted land use ($1) , multiple land use ($2) and multiple land use with underground space design ($3)) were carried out for a large-scale site contaminated by benzene in Beijing. The results showed that the primary exposure pathway was indoor vapor inhalation, with carcinogenic risks significantly higher than the acceptable level ( 1.0 × 10 -6 ) based on the three scenarios. The results from S1 indicated that the indoor vapor inhalation was at a level of 9.2 × 10 -5^. The results from S2 based on multiple land use revealed that only the carcinogenic risk of region E exceeded the acceptable level ( 1.0 × 10 -6 ^) , with the calculated carcinogeni risk at 4. 3 × 10-4^. However, if the inter,regional impacts were considered, region E caused the carcinogenic risks of all the neighboring regions to be higher than the acceptable level ( 1.0 × 10 -6^ ) , with exposure concentrations of benzene about 3-5 orders of magnitude higher than those of the neighboring regions. The results from S3 revealed that the carcinogenic risks of region A, B and C were 1.2 × 10-7^, 2.7 × 10 -7^, 2.5 × 10-7^ respectively-lower than the acceptable risk. The risks of region E (2.7 × 10 5) were greatly mitigated due to contaminated soil excavation. The risk of region 1) was eliminated due to the excavation of all the contaminated soil, however, region D may still exceed the acceptable risk due to the impact from region E if region E is not cleaned up to meet the remediation goal. The present study concluded that land use plan and buihling design have great impacts on Ihe results of risk attalysis clue to the impacts on calculation of exposure concentration and selection of site- specific parameters and exposure parameters and exposure pathways, and inter-regional impact analysis is also important if there is a highly elevated contamination region.
出处 《环境科学研究》 EI CAS CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期788-795,共8页 Research of Environmental Sciences
基金 北京市科学技术委员会重大项目(D08040000360000) 中意污染场地管理国际合作项目
关键词 污染场地 健康风险评估 用地规划 功能区影响分析 contaminated site human risk assessment land use planning inter-functional areas impact analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1骆永明.中国污染场地修复的研究进展、问题与展望[J].环境监测管理与技术,2011,23(3):1-6. 被引量:201
  • 2赵沁娜.城市土地置换过程中土壤污染研究进展评述[J].土壤,2009,41(3):350-355. 被引量:24
  • 3MAQSOOD I,LI Jianbing, HUANG Guohe, et al. Simulation-based risk assessment of contaminated sites under remediation scenarios, planning periods, and land-use patterns: a Canadian case study [ J ]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2005,19(2) :146-157.
  • 4FERGUSON C C. Assessing risk from contaminated sites: policy and practice in 16 European countries[ J]. Land Contamination and Reclamation, 1999,7 ( 2 ) : 33- 54.
  • 5US Environmental Protection Agency. Risk assessment guidance far superfund(volume I )human health evaluation manual supplement to part A: community involvement in superfund risk assessments [ R]. Washinton DC :Office of Emergency and Remedial Response and US Environmental Protection Agency, 1991:2-8.
  • 6FERGUSON C, DARMENDRAIL D, FREIER K, et al, Risk assessment for contaminated sites in Europe ( volume 1 ) t scientific basis [ M ]. Nottingham : LQM Press, 1998;25-79.
  • 7STAVRIANOU W. The western Australian contaminated sites act 2003: the applicability of risk assessment as la basis for the assessment and management of site eontamlnatiort [ D ], Westero Australian, 2009 : 7- 27.
  • 8Ministry for Environment. Guidelines for assessi/lg and rognggiog petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated sites in New Zealand [ S ], New Zealand:Ministry for the Environment,2011:2-14.
  • 9姜林,钟茂生,张丽娜,张俊丽,贾晓洋,韩丹,张丹,夏天翔,姚珏君.基于风险的中国污染场地管理体系研究[J].环境污染与防治,2014,36(8):1-10. 被引量:46
  • 10环境保护部.HJ25.3-2014污染场地风险评估技术导则[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2014.

二级参考文献211

共引文献395

同被引文献229

引证文献23

二级引证文献206

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部