期刊文献+

农地还权赋能改革与农民长效增收机制研究——来自四川省统筹城乡综合配套改革试验区的证据 被引量:6

Study on Farmland Right Enabling Reform and Long-term Increase in Rural Incomes Mechanism:Evidence from Sichuan Province Urban and Rural Comprehensive Reform Pilot Area
原文传递
导出
摘要 自20世纪80年代中后期以来,农地制度改革长期处于裹足不前的停滞状态。在此背景下,成都等部分地区陆续开展起来的农地产权改革引起了社会各界的高度关注。本文在系统辨析现阶段农地产权制度的内涵及外延的基础上,认为农地还权赋能改革将使得农地产权由模糊渐进向清晰迈进,这将使得农地租值的耗散逐渐减少,而农民长效增收机制也将有坚实的产权制度基础。为证实这一推论,本文基于四川省2005—2010年138个县(市)的相关社会经济数据对农地还权赋能改革的政策效果进行了系统而严格的实证检验。实证结果表明,在采用了双重差分模型分离了其他因素对农民增收的影响之后,农地还权赋能改革对成都市农民收入的增长率有相当大的正向推动作用,但是这一改革绩效在四川省的省级试点和市级试点县(市)中却未能体现出来。 Since the 1980 s,the reform of farmland system is in a long-term stagnation.In this background,the increasing farmland property rights reform in Chengdu and some other parts of Sichuan province has caused high attention from all occupations.On the basis of system analysis of connotation and denotation in current farmland property right system,in this paper,it believes farmland right enabling reform will bring the farmland property right from a fuzzy state gradually to a clear one,which will enable farmers to rent value dissipation reduce gradually,and long-term increase in rural incomes mechanism will also have a solid foundation of property right system.To prove this inference,this article is based on related social economic data in 138 counties(cities) of Sichuan province from 2005 to 2008 to make a systematic and rigorous empirical test on the effect of farmland right enabling reform.The empirical results show that after it adopted double difference model to separate other factors on the farmers' income,the farmland right enabling reform has played a considerable positive role in promoting Chengdu farmers income increase rate.However,the performance failed to show up in the Sichuan provincial pilot reform and municipal pioneer areas.At the end of this paper,it discussed the future direction of the farmland right enabling reform.
作者 黄砺 谭荣
出处 《农业经济问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期12-21,共10页 Issues in Agricultural Economy
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"农地非农化管理的基础性制度:评价和创新"(编号:71273008)
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Ho Peter. Who Owns Chinag Land? Policies, Property Rights and Deliberate Institutional Ambiguity. China Quarterly,2001 (16) :394 : 421.
  • 2Gordon H. S.. The Economic Theory of a Common Property Resource:The Fishery. The Journal of Political Economy, 1954,64 (2) :124 : 142.
  • 3Barzel Y.. A Theory of Rationing by Waiting. Journal of Law and Economics, 1974,17 (1) :73 : 76.
  • 4Cheung Steven. A Theory of Price Control Journal of Law and Economies, 1974,17( 1 ) :53 : 71.
  • 5Meyer B.. Natural and Quasi-Experiments in Economics. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 1995,13 (2) :151 : 161.
  • 6Heckman J.. Sample Selection Bias as A Specification Error. Econometriea, 1979, (47) :153 -161.
  • 7杜润生.杜润生自述:中国农村体制变革重大决策纪实.人民出版社,2007:132-133.
  • 8北京大学国家发展研究院综合课题组.还权赋能:奠定长期发展的可靠基础.北京大学出版社.2010.
  • 9刘守英.土地制度与农民权利[J].中国土地科学,2000,14(3):1-9. 被引量:68
  • 10冀县卿,钱忠好.剩余索取权、剩余控制权与中国农业阶段性增长[J].江海学刊,2009(1):106-111. 被引量:13

二级参考文献148

共引文献960

同被引文献178

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部