期刊文献+

黏连性肠梗阻行腹腔镜肠黏连松解术与开腹肠黏连松解术的对比分析 被引量:12

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜肠黏连松解术与开腹肠黏连松解术的临床疗效并对两者进行对比分析。方法在该院进行手术治疗的黏连性肠梗阻患者44例,其中采用腹腔镜肠黏连松解术以及开腹肠黏连松解术的患者各22例,观察两组患者手术中以及手术后的各项指标。结果腹腔镜手术所用手术时间、下床活动时间、术后住院时间以及肠蠕动恢复时间均较开腹手术组短,患者术后出血量以及患者在术后采用镇痛的病例数均比开腹手术组患者更少,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05);术后的并发症发生率较开腹手术组小,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);腹腔镜手术组患者在治疗后腹痛腹胀的症状消失的有20例(90.91%),仍偶有腹痛的患者有2例(9.09%);而开腹手术组患者手术后症状消失的有18例(81.82%),仍有症状者3例(13.64%),其中有1例患者需再次进行黏连松解术,开腹手术组在术后仍有症状以及需要再次手术的患者多于腹腔镜手术组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜肠黏连松解术比开腹肠黏连松解术具有更多的优越性,具有安全、手术时间短、手术中出血少、术后恢复快等优点。
出处 《安徽医药》 CAS 2015年第5期955-956,共2页 Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Husain A, Bhat S, Roy AK, et al. Internal Hernia through Paraduo- denal Recess withAcute Intestinal Obstruction: A Case Report [J]. Indian J Surg,2012,74(4) :354 -355.
  • 2Singh UC, Kumar A, Srivastava A, et al. Small bowel stricture and perforation : anunusual presentation of Fasciolopsis buski [ J ]. Trop gastroentero1,2021,32 (4) : 320 - 322.
  • 3Fagenholz PJ, De Moya MA. Laparoscopic treatment of bowel ob- struction due to abezoar in a Meckel's diverticulum [ J ]. JSLS, 2011,15 (4) :562-564.
  • 4Fanning J, Hojat R, Deimling T. Laparoscopic major gynecologic surgery in patients with prior laparotomy bowel resection [ J ]. JSLS,2011,15(4) :448 -450.
  • 5Kim HD, Reavis KM, Nguyen NT. Laparoscopic management of sleeve obstruction [ J ]. Surg Obes Relat Dis,2012,8 ( 5 ) : e59.
  • 6段栩飞,叶国刚,孙烜,闫学强,杨俊,郑凯,梁翀,杨虎,汪昕,卞红强.腹腔镜肠粘连松解术治疗小儿小肠粘连性肠梗阻临床分析[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2013,34(7):504-507. 被引量:45
  • 7Tatz A J, Segev G, Steinman A, et al. Surgical treatment for acute small intestinal obstruction caused by Parascaris equorum infection in 15 horses (2002 -2011 ) [ J]. Equine Vet J Suppl,2012,44(43):111 -114.
  • 8冯北锦,廖南生.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻疗效比较[J].浙江临床医学,2013,15(11):1698-1699. 被引量:7
  • 9王炬,边浩鹏,苏玉国,郭华,李志玲,朱明.腹腔镜结合快速康复外科在粘连性肠梗阻治疗中的应用[J].河北医科大学学报,2013,34(10):1179-1182. 被引量:10

二级参考文献25

  • 1江志伟,李宁,黎介寿.快速康复外科的概念及临床意义[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(2):131-133. 被引量:1356
  • 2吴孟超,吴在德.黄家驷外科学[M].7版,北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:1329-1330.
  • 3Ellis H. The clinical significance of adhesions focus on intestinal obstruction. EurJ Surg Suppl, 1997, (557): 5-9.
  • 4DuronJ J, du Montcel ST, Berger A, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of mortality and morbidity after operation for adhesive postoperative small of small bowel obstruction. AmJ Surg, 2008,195(6): 726-734.
  • 5Ghosheh B, SalamehJR. Laparoscopic approach to acute small bowel obstruction: review of 1061 cases. Surg Endosc, 2007,21 (11): 1945-1949.
  • 6Tittel A, Treutner KH, Titkova S, et al. Comparison of adhesion reformation after laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis in an animal model. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2001, 386(2): 141-145.
  • 7Okamoto H, Wakana H, Kawashima K, et al. Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic adhesiolysis for mechanical small bowel obstruction. AsianJ Endosc Surg, 2012,5(2) :53-58.
  • 8Grafen FC, Neuhaus V, Schob 0, et al. Management of acute small bowel obstruction from intestinal adhesions: indications for laparoscopic surgery in a community teaching hospital. Langenbecks Arch Surg,2010,395(1) :57-63.
  • 9O'Connor DB, Winter DC. The role of laparoscopy in the management of acute small-bowel obstruction: a review of over 2,000 cases. Surg Endosc, 2012,26(1): 12-17.
  • 10Farinella E, Cirocchi R, La Mura F, et al. Feasibility of laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction. WorldJ Emerg Surg, 2009,4:3.

共引文献59

同被引文献82

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部