期刊文献+

腹腔镜手术诊疗消化道穿孔临床价值 被引量:15

Value of laparoscopic surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal perforation
原文传递
导出
摘要 消化道穿孔是外科急腹症之一,病情一般较重且进展较快,常须行穿孔修补手术治疗,包括开腹手术和腹腔镜手术。腹腔镜手术在手术时间、术后止痛剂使用、住院时间、术后恢复时间、刀口感染发生率等方面具有明显优势,尤其近年随着腹腔镜技术的飞速发展,腹腔镜手术已逐渐替代开腹手术治疗消化道穿孔。尽管腹腔镜手术治疗消化道穿孔已广泛应用于临床,但在手术技能、病人选择方面仍存在一些争议及问题,而这往往成为导致中转开腹的主要因素。因此,外科医师在提高手术技能的同时,还须严格掌握手术适应证,以避免对病人造成不必要的损伤。 Gastrointestinal perforation is one of the acute abdomen, which is severe and has rapid progress. It often requires surgical repair. At present, there are two methods, including laparoscopic and open surgery. Comparatively speaking, laparoscopic surgery has obvious advantage in the operating time , postoperative analgesic use, length of hospital stay and recovery time, incision infection. Especially, with the rapid development, laparoscopic surgery has already become the main treatment strategy of the gastrointestinal perforation. Although laparoscopic surgery in the treatment Of gastrointestinal perforation has been widely used in clinical, there are still some controversial in surgical skills and patient selection,which requires more attention. These problems are often the major factors leading to conversion of laparotomy, so this requires surgeons improving their skills and strictly mastering surgical indications, in order to avoid unnecessary harm and trouble.
作者 胡三元
出处 《中国实用外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期490-493,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery
关键词 消化道穿孔 腹腔镜 开腹手术 gastrointestinal perforation laparoscopy opensurgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Miller MH, Adamsen S, Thomsen RW, et al. Muhicentre trial of a perioperative protocol to reduce mortality in patients with pep- tic ulcer perforation [ J ]. Br J Surg, 2011,98 (6) : 802-810.
  • 2Sanabria A, Villegas MI, Morales Uribe CH. Lapamscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease [DB]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013,2: CD004778.
  • 3Byrge N, Barton RG, Enniss TM, et al. Laparoseopic versus open repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis[J]. Am J Surg. 2013,206 (6):957-962.
  • 4Bhogal RH, Athwal R, Durkin D, et al. Comparison between open and laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer disease [J]. World J Surg, 2008,32(11):2371-2374.
  • 5Wang YC, Fu CY, Ghen R J, et al. Comparison between laparo- scopic and open repair of perforated peptic ulcer disease in the elderly [ J ]. Am Surg, 2011,77(6): 803-804.
  • 6Soreide K, Thorsen K, Soreide JA. Strategies to improve the out- come of emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer [J]. Br J Surg, 2014,101(1):e51-e64.
  • 7Ares M, Sevil S, Bakircioglu E, et al. Laparoscopie repair of pep- tic ulcer perforation without omental patch versus conventional open repair[J ]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Teeh A, 2007,17 (5) : 615-619.
  • 8Amaud JP, Tueeh J J, Bergamaschi R, et al. Laparoscopie suture closure of perforated duodenal peptic ulcer [J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2002,12 ( 3 ) : 145-147.
  • 9Katkhouda N, Mayor E, Mason R J, et al. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: outcome and efficacy in 30 consecu- tive patients[J]. Arch Surg, 1999,134(8) : 845-850.
  • 10Lunevieius R, Morkevicius M. Management strategies, early re- suits, benefits, and risk factors of laparoseopic repair of perfo- rated peptic ulcer [ J ]. World J Surg, 2005,29 (10) : 1299-1310.

同被引文献98

引证文献15

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部