期刊文献+

噪声对低龄正常儿童言语感知的影响 被引量:6

A Pilot Study of Noise Effect on Speech Perception in Young Children with Normal Hearing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨言语谱噪声(speech spectrum-shaped noise,SSN)和多人谈话噪声(babble noise,BN)对低龄正常儿童普通话词汇相邻性测试(Mandarin lexical neighborhood test,MLNT)言语感知的影响。方法 34例3~6岁正常听力儿童分为SSN组(21例)和BN组(13例),使用噪声下普通话词汇相邻性测试系统对两组儿童行声场下的言语测试,以听说复述方法获得不同信噪比下的言语识别率,比较两组两类噪声下的单音节易词表、难词表和双音节易词表、难词表的识别率-信噪比函数曲线(P-SNR曲线)和言语识别阈(SNR50)。结果 SSN组双音节易词表和难词表的SNR50阈值分别为-3dB、-0.5dB,单音节易词表和难词表的SNR50分别为-1dB、3.5dB;BN组双音节易词表和难词表的SNR50分别为-3dB、2dB,单音节易词表和难词表的SNR50分别为0.5dB、10dB。两组除双音节易词表SNR50相同外,其余各类词表BN组的SNR50均比SSN组高。词汇学因素对正常听力儿童噪声下的开放式言语识别的影响仍表现出易词识别率高于难词,双音节词识别率高于单音节词。结论对3~6岁正常听力儿童BN的掩蔽效应比SSN强,词汇学因素在噪声下仍然影响儿童的言语识别。 Objective To study normal hearing children's speech perception in Speech Spectrum -Shaped Noise (SSN) and Babble Noise (BN) using the Mandarin lexical neighborhood test .Methods Thirty -four children with normal hearing were included in this study and randomly assigned to the SSN group and the BN group .Each child was given the 12 lists of Mandarin lexical neighborhood test ,word recognition scores were acquired at different SNRs .Results SNR50 of dissyllablic easy word lists ,dissyllablic hard word lists ,monosyllable easy word lists , monosyllable hard word lists in SSN were -3 dB ,-0 .5 dB ,-1 dB and 3 .5 dB ,respectively ;SNR50 of the four categories lists in BN were -3 dB ,2 dB ,0 .5 dB and 10 dB ,respectively .Lexical effects had a significant influence on spoken word recognition in noise .Especially ,word recognition scores of easy words were higher than those of hard words ,dissyllablic words were better than monosyllable words .Conclusion The masking effects of babble noise on spoken speech perception are stronger than speech spectrum -shaped noise for 3-6 year-old normal hearing chil‐dren .Lexical effects also affet children's speech recognition in noise .
出处 《听力学及言语疾病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期236-239,共4页 Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81170916) 首都卫生发展科研专项基金(首发2011-1017-05)资助
关键词 儿童 噪声 言语感知 Children Noise Speech recognition
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Leibold LJ. Hillock - Dunn A. Duncan N. et al. Influence of hearing loss on children's identification of spondee words in a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker[J], Ear Hear. 2013.34:575,.
  • 2Nilsson M. Soli SD. Sullivan JA. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresh?olds in quiet and in noise[J]. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994.95: 1085,.
  • 3Leibold LJ. Buss E, Children's identification of consonants in a speech- shaped noise or a two- talker masker[J], J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013.56: 1144,.
  • 4Lorenzi C. Husson M. Ardoint M. et al. Speech masking re?lease in listeners with flat hearing loss: effects of masker fluc?tuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature recep?tion[J], Int J Audiol , 2006.45:487.
  • 5Talarico M. Abdilla G. Aliferis M. et al. Effect of age and cognition on childhood speech in noise perception abilities[J]. Audiol Neurootol , 2007.12: 13.
  • 6Yang HM. Hsieh YJ. W u JL. Speech recognition performance under noisy conditions of children with hearing 10ss[J]. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngcl , 2012.5(Suppl1) :S73.
  • 7张宁,盛玉麒,刘莎,吴璇,龙墨,王树峰,徐娟娟,姬晨,王伟.普通话儿童词汇相邻性单音节词表的编制[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2009,17(4):313-317. 被引量:30
  • 8张宁,刘莎,盛玉麒,郭连生,杨宜林,徐娟娟.普通话儿童词汇相邻性多音节词表编制研究[J].中华耳科学杂志,2008,6(1):30-34. 被引量:36
  • 9Yuen KC. Luan L. Li H. et al. Development of the computer?ized Mandarin pediatric lexical tone and disyllabic - word pic?ture identification test in noise (MAPPID- N)[J]. Cochlear Implants Int. 2009 .10(Suppl 1): 138.
  • 10Fallon M. Trehub SE. Schneider BA. Children's perception of speech in multi talker babble[J], J Acoust Soc Am. 2000. 108: 3023,.

二级参考文献49

  • 1沈晔,王书鑫.一个言语测听材料的编制[J].心理学报,1983,15(3):316-328. 被引量:18
  • 2Moore JK.Maturation of human auditory cortex:implications for speech perception[J].Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol(Suppl),2002,189:7.
  • 3Elliott LL.Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability[J].J Acoust Soc Am,1979,66:651.
  • 4Fior R.Physiological maturation of auditory function between 3 and 13 years of age[J].Audiology,1972,11:317.
  • 5Eisenberg LS,Shannon RV,Martinez AS,et al.Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age[J].J Acoust Soc Am,2000,107:2 704.
  • 6Nittrouer S,Boothroyd A.Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults[J].J Acoust Soc Am,1990,87:2 705.
  • 7Luce PA,Pisoni DB.Recognizing spoken words:the neighborhood activation model[J].Ear Hear,1998,19:1.
  • 8Newman RS,Sawusch JR,Lute PA.Lexical neighborhood effects in phonetic processing[J].J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform,1997,23:873.
  • 9Pisoni DB,Luce PA.Acoustic-phonetic representations in word recognition[J].Cognition,1987,25:21.
  • 10Baddeley A,Gathercole S,Papagno C.The phonological loop as a language learning device[J].Psychol Rev,1998,105:158.

共引文献41

同被引文献80

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部