“海上丝绸之路”物流绩效及对中国进出口贸易影响实证被引量：56

Empirical Analysis on Impact of Logistics Performance of Maritime Silk- Road Economic Belt on China'Import and Export Trade

下载PDF

导出

摘要物流绩效是推进海上丝绸之路经济带发展的关键要素,以物流绩效指数(LPI)为切入点,对海上丝绸之路经济带沿线国家的LPI指数及分项指标进行了定性描述与分析,同时拓展了贸易引力模型,实证分析了物流绩效对中国进出口贸易的影响。研究发现:海湾国家LPI均值好于东盟国家,南亚国家水平最低;物流基础设施质量和海关效率是拉低物流绩效的主要原因;物流绩效改善有利于中国对海上丝绸之路经济带贸易伙伴的进出口贸易,各分项指标的促进程度依次为海关效率、货物运输及时性、物流基础设施质量、物流服务能力、国际运输便利性和货物可追溯性。 Logistics performance is the key factor to promote the development of the Maritime Silk -road.Based on the logistics performance index （LPI）as the breakthrough point,on one hand,we describe and analyze the LPI indexes and the components of LPI of the Maritime Silk -road Economic Zone countries.On the other hand,we extend the trade gravity model to make empirical analysis of the impacts of LPI index and the components of trade on China.The results of the study show that：The mean of LPI of Gulf States is higher than that of ASEAN while South Asian with the lowest level.The infrastructure and customs are mainly due to the low logistics performance.International logistics performance improvement of Maritime Silk -road Economic Zone is helpful to promote the trade,but the effect degrees of each com-ponent are customs,timelines,infrastructure,logistics competence,international shipments and tracking ＆ tracing in turn.

作者樊秀峰余姗

机构地区西安交通大学经济与金融学院

出处《西安交通大学学报（社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期13-20,共8页 Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University：Social Sciences

基金国家自然科学基金项目(71441039) 教育部人文社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(14JZD022) 中央高校基本科研业务费项目(XJ1409043)

关键词海上丝绸之路物流绩效指数进出口贸易引力模型 the Maritime Silk- road logistics performance index import and export trade ,gravity model

分类号 F752.6 [经济管理—国际贸易]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献18

1ARVIS J, MUSTRA M A, OJALA L, et al. Connecting to Compete 2012:Trade Logistics in the Global Economy[R]. Access & Download Statistics, 2012.
2HAUSMAN W H, LEE H L, SUBRAMANIAN U. Global Logistics Indicators, Supply Chain Metrics, and Bilateral Trade Patterns[R]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2005, NO.3773.
3WILSON J S, MANN C L, OTSUKI T. Assessing the Benefits of Trade Facilitation:A Global Perspective[J]. General Information, 2005, 28(6):841-871.
4SOLOAGA I, WILSON J S, MEJIA A. Trade facilitation reform and Mexican competitiveness[R]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2006, NO.3953.
5IWANOW T, KIRKPATRICK C. Trade facilitation and manufactured exports:Is Africa different?[J]. World Development, 2009, 37(6):1039-1050.
6KORINEK J, SOURDIN P. To what extent are high-quality logistics services trade facilitating?[R]. OECD Trade Policy Working Papers, 2011,NO.108.
7MARTI L, PUERTAS R, GARCIA L. Relevance of trade facilitation in emerging countries′ exports[J]. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 2014, 23(2):202-222.
8MARTI L, PUERTAS R, GARCIA L, et al. The importance of the Logistics Performance Index in international trade[J]. Applied Economics, 2014, 46(24):2982-2992.
9JESUS F,UTSAV K. The Role of Trade Facilitation in Central Asia:A Gravity Model[R]. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College Working Paper, 2010, No.628.
10HERTEL T W, MIRZA T. The role of trade facilitation in South Asian economic integration [R].Study on Intraregional Trade and Investment in South Asian, 2009:2.