摘要
目的探讨临床护理路径在重度支气管哮喘患者中的应用效果。方法选取该院2012年8月—2014年8月收治的148例重症支气管哮喘患者,随机将其分为对照组与干预组各74例,对照组患者仅采用常规护理措施,干预组患者则开展临床护理路径,比较两组病例护理后症状消失时间、认知程度、遵医行为及满意程度,并行临床应用价值分析。结果干预组患者的症状消失时间为(9.8±3.9)d,认知率为82.4%,遵医率为91.9%,满意率为97.3%,均显著好于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);同时,该组患者的FEV1为(2.2±0.3)L,PEF为(6.3±0.3)L/s,FEV1/FVC为(66.9±4.0)%,亦明显好于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论针对重症支气管哮喘患者采用临床护理路径可显著提高病症与肺功能改善效果,并良好提升临床认知率、遵医率及满意程度,值得广泛推广应用。
[ Objective To investigate the application effect of clinical nursing pathway on severe bronchial asthma. Methods 148 cases with severe bronchial asthma admitted in our hospital from August 2012 to August 2014 were selected and randomly divided into the control group and the intervention group with 74 cases in each. The control group were only treated by the conventional nursing, while the intervention group were treated by the clinical nursing pathway. After nursing, the symptoms disappearing time, cognitive level, compliance behavior and satisfaction were compared between the two groups, and the clinical application value was analyzed. Results In the intervention group, the symptoms disappearing time was （9.8±3.9）d, cognition rate was 82.4%, compliance rate was 91.9%, satisfaction rate was 97.3%, which was significantly better than that of the control group, respectively, with statistical significance（P〈0.05）;in the intervention group, the FEV1 was （2.2±0.3）L, PEF was （6.3±0.3） L/s, FEV1/FVC was （66.9±4.0）%, much better than that of the control group, respectively with statistical significance（P〈0.05）. Conclusion For patients with severe bronchial asthma, clinical nursing pathway can significantly improve the symptoms and lung function, enhance the clinical cognition rate, compliance rate and degree of satisfaction, therefore it is worthy of wide application and promotion.
出处
《中外医疗》
2015年第10期144-145,148,共3页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
