期刊文献+

基于博弈分析的支线航空合作动因 被引量:4

Game-Based Analysis on Motive of Regional Air Route Cooperation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对支线航空因运输规模小、运营成本高导致独立运营盈利水平低的问题,运用BERTRAND博弈模型,从市场博弈的角度分析了支线航线与干线进行合作对其运营效果的影响.将支线航线分为枢纽辐射型和点对点型2种类型,根据支线至最终目的地仅有通过枢纽中转的航班和中转与直达航班并存这两种支线运营的市场情况,分别建立了支线、干线合作与不合作情况的市场结构模型,对比分析了各种市场结构达到均衡时的共同利润.研究结果表明,在2种市场情况下,支线与干线合作市场结构的共同利润均高于不合作时的共同利润,并通过算例分析进行了验证. Since the independent regional air route operates at a low level of profitability because of small transport volume and high operation cost, the BERTRAND game model was used to analyze the effect of the cooperation of the regional air route with branch air route on its operating profit from the point of market game. Regional air route was divided into two types, "point to point" and "hubspoke". Market structure models of cooperation and non-cooperation between regional air route and branch air route were built respectively for the origin-destination regional markets without point to point air route and with both point to point and hub-spoke air route. Total equilibrium profits under different market structures were compared. The results show that total profits of cooperative market structures are higher than those of noncooperation.
出处 《西南交通大学学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期557-561,共5页 Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71171111)
关键词 航空运输 市场影响 竞争 合作 博弈模型 air transportation market impacts competition cooperation game model
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1杨艳,鄢戟.美国支线航空的发展及其对中国的启示[J].云南财经大学学报,2008,24(2):110-115. 被引量:6
  • 2GOETZ A R, VOWLES T M. The good, the bad, and the ugly: 30 years of US airline deregulation[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2009, 17 ( 4 ) : 251- 263.
  • 3Regional Airline Association. 2012 Annual report[EB/OL]. [ 2014-03-25 ]. http: ///www. raa. org/Media/Publieations.
  • 4勃格特·克莱曼,汉努·塞利斯通.航空公司战略联盟管理[M].北京:中国民航出版社,2009.
  • 5AGUIRREGABIRIA V, HO C. A dynamic game of airline network competition: hub-and-spoke networks and entry deterrence I J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2010, 28: 377-382.
  • 6LIN M H. Airline alliances and entry deterrence[J]. Transportation Research Part E, 2008, 44: 637-652.
  • 7DU Yan, MCMULLEN B S, KERKVLIET J R. The economic impact of the ATA/southwest airlines code- share agreement[ J]. Research in Transportation Economics, 2008, 24: 51-60.
  • 8GOH M, YONG J. Impacts of code-share alliances on airline cost structure: a truncated third-order translog estimation[ J ]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2006, 24: 835-866.
  • 9ZHANG Bingxiang, SHI Mingsheng, LIU Jimin. Hub- and-spoke construction study of air China[C]// International Conference on Future Energy, Environment, and Materials. Hong Kong: Elsevier, 2012 : 971-976.
  • 10MART~N J C, DORTA A V. A note on how to measure hubbing practices in airline networks [ J ]. Transportation Research Part E, 2009, 45: 250-254.

二级参考文献6

  • 1[1]RAA,u.s.Regional Airlines Fact Sheet[DB/OL]..http://www,raa.org,2003-7-25.
  • 2[3]RAA,RA Industry Traffic Statistics 2001-2003,[EB],http://www,raa.org.
  • 3[4]BTS of USA,2004 Domestic Airline Traffic Data,[EB],http://www.bts.gov.
  • 4[5]AvStat Associates,inc:Regional airline code sharing partnerships as of April 2004,[EB].
  • 5[6]Sky West,inc:2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K,[EB],http://www.skywest,com.
  • 6[7]BTS of USA,BTS Releases First Quarter 2004 Airline Financial Data,[EB],http://www.bts.gov.

共引文献5

同被引文献27

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部