期刊文献+

重度僵硬型脊柱侧凸的一期后路Ponte截骨置钉二期后路矫形术 被引量:8

Treatment of severe rigid scoliosis with one-stage posterior Ponte osteotomy and two-stage posterior orthopedics
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨一期后路Ponte截骨置钉二期后路矫形在治疗重度僵硬型脊柱侧凸中的疗效及安全性.方法 回顾性分析2010年6月至2012年12月接受一期后路Ponte截骨二期后路矫形治疗的Cobb角大于100°的僵硬型脊柱侧凸患者24例,男9例,女15例;年龄14~30岁,平均(21.4±4.1)岁.术前冠状面主弯Cobb角106°~156°,平均125.8°;后凸角59°~141°,平均100.1°.一期后路Ponte截骨松解、置钉,术后Halo-股骨髁上牵引,再行二期后路置棒矫形融合术.比较术前站立位、后路松解牵引后仰卧位、术后及末次随访的冠状面主弯Cobb角.结果 术前仰卧Bending位主弯侧凸柔韧性为14.8%±7.5%;后路松解牵引后主弯侧凸柔韧性为29.1%±9.9%;较术前平均提高14.3%,差异有统计学意义.后路矫形术后主弯Cobb角平均74.4°±14.5°,矫正率平均41.0%±8.1%;与术前仰卧Bending位和松解牵引后比较矫正率分别提高了26.2%和11.9%,差异有统计学意义.术后随访15~36个月,平均(24.0±5.9)个月.末次随访时主弯Cobb角平均丢失1.4°.术后后凸角平均53.0°±13.7°,较术前(100.1°±23.7°)明显改善,矫正率平均46.1%±11.9%,末次随访时无矫正丢失.牵引中1例发生左侧股骨髁上钉道感染,2例发生左下肢静脉血栓.结论 后路Ponte截骨松解+Halo-股骨髁上牵引能够使重度僵硬型脊柱侧凸患者获得满意的矫正率,但应注意下肢静脉血栓形成的风险. Objective To discuss the efficacy and safety of one-stage posterior Ponte osteotomy and two-stage posterior orthopedics in treatment of severe rigid scoliosis.Methods Retrospective review was conducted for 24 patients with severerigid scoliosis (Cobb angle >100°) who underwent one-stage posterior Ponte osteotomy and two-stage posterior orthopedics between June 2010 and December 2012,including 9 male patients and 15 female patients.The average age is 21.4±4.1 (ranging from 14 to 30).The major curve Cobb angle on preoperative coronal plane was 106°-156° (125.8° on the average);kyphosis angle was 59°-141° (100.1° on the average).All patients experienced one-stage posterior Ponte osteotomy,screw insertion,postoperative Haloskeletal traction through supracondyle of femur and two-stage posterior orthopedic fusion.The Cobb angles of the major curve at the standing position before surgery,at supine position after posterior release and traction and on postoperative coronal plane and on coronal plane in the last follow-up.Results The flexibility of major curve at bending position before the surgery was 14.8%±7.5%;the flexibility of major curve after posterior release and traction was 29.1%±9.9%;it improves 14.3% compared with that before the surgery.The difference has statistical significance.The Cobb angle of major curve after posterior orthopedics was 74.4°±14.5° on the average;the mean correction rate was 41.0%±8.1%.It boots 26.2% and 11.9% respectively compared with preoperative bending position and posterior release and traction.The different has statistical significance.The postoperation follow-up duration was 15-36 months (24.0±5.9 months on the average).At the last follow-up,the average loss of Cobb angle of major curve was 1.4°.The post-operative kyphosis angle was 53.0°±13.7° on the average which significantly improves compared with pre-operation (100.1°±23.7°).The mean correction rate was 46.1%± 11.9%.No correction loss was shown in the last follow-up.One patient experienced superficial pin-site infection and two patients had deep venous thrombosis of the left limb.Conclusion Posterior Ponte osteotomy combined with Halo-femoral traction could achieve satisfactory correction rate for patients with severe rigid scoliosis.However,the risk caused by thrombus of lower extremity veins should be noticed during the whole procedure.
出处 《中华骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期595-601,共7页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
基金 江苏省医学重点人才资助项目(RC2011148)
关键词 脊柱侧凸 截骨术 牵引术 矫形外科手术 Scoliosis Osteotomy Traction Orthopedic procedures
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Koller H, Zenner J, Gajic V, et al. The impact of halo-gravity trac- tion on curve rigidity and pulmonary function in the treatment of severe and rigid scoliosis and kyphoscoliosis: a clinical study and narrative review of the literature[J]. Eur Spine J, 2012, 21(3): 514- 529.
  • 2Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, et al. Anterior/posterior spinal in- strumentation versus posterior instrumentation alone for the treat- ment of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 90 de- grees[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2006, 31(20): 2386-2391.
  • 3张宏其,郭超峰,陈凌强,刘少华,王永福,陈静.大重量牵引辅助一期后路手术治疗100°以上青少年特发性脊柱侧凸[J].中华骨科杂志,2008,28(6):443-447. 被引量:9
  • 4Bullmann V, Halm HF, Schulte T, et al. Combined anterior and posterior instrumentation in severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis [J]. Eur Spine J, 2006, 15(4): 440-448.
  • 5Longis PM, Odri G, Passuti N, et al. Does thoracoscopic anterior release of rigid idiopathic scolioses associated with correction by posterior instrumentation result in better long- term frontal and sagittal balance[J]? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2011, 97(7): 734- 740.
  • 6汪飞,邱勇,钱邦平,朱泽章,蒋军,季明亮,王鑫强.后路全脊椎截骨治疗严重脊柱畸形内固定棒断裂危险因素分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2012,32(10):946-950. 被引量:31
  • 7姚子明,仉建国,邱贵兴,王升儒,翁习生,郭建伟.一期后路全脊椎切除治疗重度脊柱畸形围手术期并发症及其相关危险因素分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2013,33(5):440-446. 被引量:28
  • 8陈刚,李方财,徐侃,吴琼华,陈维善,陈其昕.后路经椎弓根截骨治疗脊柱畸形围手术期并发症分析[J].中华骨科杂志,2012,32(10):939-945. 被引量:10
  • 9Kelly MP, Lenke LG, Shaffrey CI, et al. Evaluation of complica- tions and neurological deficits with three- column spine recon- structions for complex spinal deformity: a retrospective Scoli- RISK-1 study[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2014, 36(5): E 17.
  • 10Hyun SJ, Lenke LG, Kim YC, et al. Comparison of standard 2-rod constructs to multiple-rod constructs for fixation across 3-column spinal osteotomies[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2014, 39(22): 1899- 1904.

二级参考文献102

共引文献85

同被引文献36

引证文献8

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部