期刊文献+

中国校车补贴制度的经济效应与顶层设计 被引量:1

The Economic Effect and Top-level Design on China's School Bus Subsidy System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 立足于经济学基本理论,结合校车服务存在区域差异的客观现实,中国应该尽早出台国家层面的,并且与各地经济水平和财政实力相匹配的校车补贴制度。有条件非配套性、封顶配套性和不封顶配套性的校车补贴制度不仅在内容上存在明显差异,而且所带来的经济效应也迥然不同。借鉴国外校车补贴制度的经验,中国校车补贴制度顶层设计时应重点关注五个方面,亦即按照不同区域采取不同的校车补贴制度、将校车补贴纳入"两免一补"的范畴、构建合理的校车成本分担机制、有序推进校车补贴制度、建立规范化的校车专项转移支付制度等。 Our country should introduce the national school bus subsidy system as soon as possible, which should be compatible with local economic development level and financial strength. Not only conditional non-matching school bus subsidy system, capped matching school bus subsidy system and uncapped matching school bus subsidy system have obvious differences in content, but also the economic effects on them are also very different. Learning from the experience of foreign school bus subsidy system, top-level design school bus subsidy system should focus on the following five basic orientation, which include adopting a different school bus subsidy system in different regions, bringing the school bus subsidies into " two exemptions and one subsidy", building a reasonable school bus cost-sharing mechanisms, promoting the school bus subsidy system orderly, establishing a standardized school bus special transfer payment system.
作者 董少林
出处 《北京社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期54-59,共6页 Social Sciences of Beijing
基金 国家社科基金青年项目(12CGL110)
关键词 校车 补贴制度 经济效应 顶层设计 school bus subsidy system economic effect top-level design
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Casey L M.School Business Adiministration[M].New York:The Center for Applied Research in Education,Inc.,1967.
  • 2Jenna Mcmurray.Public school board won't raise bus fees despite budget woes[N].Calgary Sun(Alberta,Canada),2013-03-14.
  • 3Thieke,Doreen.Mit dem Schulbus unterwegs zur Christlichen Gemeinschaftsschule:das Ries als Beispiel[M].Bad Windsheim,2013.
  • 4Director of Children's Services,Manchester City Council Report fro Resolution of School Transport[R],Manchester City Council,2006.
  • 5R.Vance Eaton.Thinly Veiled:Institutional Messages in the Language of Secularism in Public Schools in France and the United States[J],South Carolina Journal of International Law&Business,2010,6(4).
  • 6文部科学省.国内校车利用情况调查报告(国内におけるスクールバス活用状况等调査报告)[R],文部科学省体育青少年局,2008.
  • 7Vasconcellos,E.A.Transporte,Escolarizacao e Politica Educational Rural[M].Cadernos de Pesquisa.2000.
  • 8Manomaipibul,A.Securing Program Go to School with Shuttle Students in Bangkok:How Student Go to School[J].Vajira Medical Journal,2007(51).
  • 9董少林,蔡永凤.农村校车服务有效供给:私人选择还是公共选择[J].财经科学,2014(6):133-140. 被引量:10
  • 10叶庆娜.农村中小学布局调整的评价:家长视角[J].教育发展研究,2012,32(24):14-18. 被引量:7

二级参考文献29

  • 1贾康,孙洁.农村公共产品与服务提供机制的研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(12):60-66. 被引量:125
  • 2汤玉刚,赵大平.论政府供给偏好的短期决定:政治均衡与经济效率[J].经济研究,2007,42(1):29-40. 被引量:32
  • 3周建国,靳亮亮.基于公共选择理论视野的政府自利性研究[J].江海学刊,2007(4):95-100. 被引量:30
  • 4[美]德尼·古莱.残酷的选择[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008:9.
  • 5肯尼思·阿罗.社会选择与个人价值[M].成都:四川人民出版社,1987.另见阿罗.社会选择:个性与多准则[M].北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社,2000.
  • 6Simon H. A, Newell A. Human problem solving: The state of the theory in 1970[J].American Psychologist,1971,26(2).
  • 7[英]弗里德利希·冯·哈耶克.自由秩序原理(上)[M].邓正来译.北京:生活.读书.新知三联书店,1997.108,276.
  • 8苏金柱,张晓震.“撤点并校”政策,究竟动了谁的“奶酪”[N].现代教育报,2012-03-14.
  • 9郭莹.教育经费占GDP比例去年首次实现超4%[EB/OL].(2013-12-31)[2014-1-5].http://epaper.jinghua.cn/html/2013-12/31/content-52367.html.
  • 10党小学.校车事故频发代表建言构筑校车安全工程彰显决心[EB/OL].(2012-3-7)[2014-1-5].http://news.jcrb.com/jxsw/201203/t20120307-820326.html.

共引文献44

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部