摘要
【目的】探析同行专家审稿行为的后评价工作,防范审稿失范行为,提高学术期刊质量。【方法】通过对同行专家的审稿行为进行调研,探究同行专家审稿行为后评价的评价指标、评价途径和评价方法。【结果】指出审稿行为后评价工作应基于评价指标,通过编辑、其他审稿专家、作者和读者的直接或间接评价来完成,并应重视影响评价效率和评价质量的相关工作环节。【结论】建立规范的审稿行为后评价制度对防范审稿行为失范、提高学术期刊质量具有重要意义。
[Purpose] This paper is to analyze the post assessment of peer-reviewing behavior for the purpose of preventing improper peer-reviewing behavior and improving the quality of academic journals.[Methodology] Based on the investigation and analysis of the frequent problems involved in peer-reviewing behavior,the paper explores the index,approaches and methods of post assessment of peer-reviewing behavior.[Findings] It proposes that post assessment of peer-reviewing behavior should be done directly or indirectly by the editor,author,readers as well as other peer-reviewers of a paper according to assessment index,and attaches importance to factors that influence the quality and efficiency of the assessment.[Conclusions] Building standard assessment system for peer-reviewing behavior is critically important in terms of taking precaution against improper peer-reviewing behavior and improving the quality of academic journals.
出处
《中国科技期刊研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期578-582,共5页
Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals
关键词
学术期刊
同行评议
审稿行为
后评价
Academic journal
Peer-reviewing behavior
Post assessment
