期刊文献+

腹腔镜胆道探查术与传统开腹手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床价值比较 被引量:25

Clinical value of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and traditional abdominal operation for gallbladder and bile duct stones
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹腔镜胆道探查术与传统开腹手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床价值。方法:将76例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者分为实验组和对照组各38例,对照组采用传统开腹手术治疗,实验组采用腹腔镜胆道探查术治疗,比较两组患者切口长度、术后通气时间、手术时间、住院时间、住院费用以及并发症发生情况。结果:实验组总有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组在切口长度、术后通气时间、手术时间以及住院时间等指标均优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者住院费用比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:腹腔镜胆道探查术可显著提升胆囊结石合并胆总管结石治疗效果,安全性良好。 Objective. To investigate the clinical value of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and the traditional abdominal patients with gallbladder and op bil eration for gallbladder and bile duct stones. Methods. 76 cases of e duct stones were divided into the experimental group and the con trol group with 38 cases in each group. The control group were treated with traditional open surgery, while the experimental group were treated with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. The length of incision, postoperative mechanical ventilation time, operation time, hospitalization dura- tion, cost of hospitalization and complications in both groups were compared. Results: The total ef- fective rate of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, which was of sta tistical difference (P〈0.05). Such indicators as the incision length, postoperative mechanical ven- tilation time, operation time and hospitalization duration were superior to those of the control group, which were of statistical differences (P〈0.05). But there were no statistical differences of the cost of hospitalization and the occurrence rate of eompications between both groups (P〉0.05).Conclusion: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is safe and can effictively improve the treatment effect of of gallbladder and bile duct stones.
出处 《华夏医学》 CAS 2015年第2期30-32,共3页 Acta Medicinae Sinica
关键词 开腹手术 腹腔镜胆道探查术 胆囊结石 胆总管结石 abdominal operation bile duct stone laparoscopic common bile duct exploration gallstone common
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献59

  • 1陈训如.如何安全地完成腹腔镜胆囊切除术[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2004,10(11):783-786. 被引量:38
  • 2邹一平,杜继东,李为民,萧荫祺,许红兵,郑方,黄辉,刘浩润,李虎成.经皮胆囊碎石术后结石复发439例随访分析[J].消化外科,2006,5(5):329-332. 被引量:14
  • 3张成武,赵大建,邹寿椿,胡智明,吴伟顶,叶再元.急性结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜手术时机及中转开腹影响因素的探讨[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2006,12(12):821-824. 被引量:97
  • 4Horstmann R.Tiwisina C,Classen C,et al.Laparoscopic versusopen appendectomy:which factors influence the decision betweenthe surgical technique?[J].Zenreabl Chir,2005,130(1):48-54.
  • 5Yin S N,Ma H,Li Q L,et al.Primary duct closure after laparo-scopic common bile bile buct exploration:aretrospective study of302 case[J].Laparoendosco Endo Surgy,2001,6(4):205-7.
  • 6Phillip E H.New technique for the treatment of common bile duct-calculi encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].ProblGen Surg,1991,8(6):387.
  • 7Fletcher D R.Percutaneous(laparoscopic)cholecystectomy andexploration of the common bile duct:the common bile duct stonere-exploration of the common bile duct:the common bile ductstonere-claimed for the surgeon[J].Aust N Z J Surg,1991,61(11):814-5.
  • 8刘溪涛,刘俊斌.腹腔镜胆囊切除术体会[J].中国误诊学杂志,2007,7(22):5287-5288. 被引量:30
  • 9黄洁夫.肝胆胰外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:1144-1148.
  • 10王旭,王翔翔,唐彤,等.内镜保胆取石术临床现状[J].普外与临床杂志,2009,16(9):773-776.

共引文献237

同被引文献128

引证文献25

二级引证文献126

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部