期刊文献+

社会支持评定量表在迷走性晕厥患者使用的价值 被引量:35

Value of social support rating scale using in patients with vasovagal syncope
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨社会支持评定量表在迷走性晕厥(VVS)患者使用的价值。方法:采用肖水源编制的"社会支持评定量表(SSRS)",对门诊或住院患者中的200例VVS患者进行调查,在我院体检中心抽取100名正常人作为对照(正常对照组)。结果:迷走性晕厥患者社会支持各项得分及总分均显著低于正常人[(33.50±8.64)分比(37.22±9.15)分](P<0.05或<0.01);与男性患者相比,女性患者在主观支持[(17.63±6.72)分比(18.62±7.56)分]、支持利用度[(7.51±2.26)分比(8.92±2.82)分]及总体社会支持[(34.32±10.61)分比(36.79±7.86)分]方面得分显著增加,但客观支持[(9.28±4.15)分比(8.37±3.49)分]得分显著减少(P<0.05或<0.01);与中老年组比较,青年组患者的主观支持[(17.08±6.34)分比(19.51±6.73)分]及总体社会支持[(33.18±10.74)分比(36.87±8.73)分]方面显著增加,但支持利用度[(8.47±2.60)分比(7.53±1.95)分]显著减少(P<0.05或<0.01)。结论:社会支持评估有助于迷走性晕厥患者的个体化诊疗,提高其生活质量。 Objective:To explore the value of social support rating scale using in patients with vasovagal syncope (VVS) .Methods:Social support rating scale (SSRS) established by XIAO Shui-yuan was used .A total of 200 VVS patients were collected from inpatients and outpatients and they received social support status investigation ,another 100 normal people were collected from our physical examination center were regarded as control (normal control group) .Results:Compared with normal control group ,there were significant reductions in scores of each item and total score of social support [ (37.22 ± 9.15) scores vs .(33.50 ± 8.64) scores] in VVS group ,P〈0.05 or 〈0.01 ;compared with male patients ,there were significant rise in scores of subjective support [ (17.63 ± 6.72) scores vs . (18.62 ± 7.56) scores] ,utilization of support [ (7.51 ± 2.26) scores vs .(8.92 ± 2.82) scores] and total social sup-port [(34.32 ± 10.61) scores vs .(36.79 ± 7.86) scores] ,and significant reduction in objective support score [(9.28 ± 4.15) scores vs .(8.37 ± 3.49) scores] in female patients , P〈0.05 or 〈0.01;compared with middle-aged and aged group ,there were significant rise in scores of subjective support [ (17.08 ± 6.34) scores vs .(19.51 ± 6.73) scores] and total social support [(33.18 ± 10.74) scores vs .(36.87 ± 8.73) scores] ,and significant reduction in uti-lization of support score [ (8.47 ± 2.60) scores vs .(7.53 ± 1.95) scores] in young group ,P〈0.05 or 〈0.01. Con-clusion:Social support assessment is help to perform individualized diagnosis and therapy for patients with vasovagal syncope ,and help to improve their quality of life .
出处 《心血管康复医学杂志》 CAS 2015年第3期249-252,共4页 Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 晕厥 血管迷走神经性 社会支持 生活质量 Syncope, vasovagal Social support Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1黄美娇,陈弹.老年人血管迷走性晕厥的研究进展[J].中华心血管病杂志,2014,42(6):534-536. 被引量:3
  • 2肖水源.社会支持评定量表[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1993,7(增刊):42-43.
  • 3WilliamC.MedicalSociology(英文版)[M].9thed,北京:北京大学出版社,2005:95-112.
  • 4Langenbach M, Schmeiβer N, KShle K. Global psychological stress and social support 3 years after solid organ transplantation [J]. J Psychosom Res, 2004, 56 (6): 648-649.
  • 5杨依,蒋晓莲.冠心病病人家属应对方式相关因素的调查研究[J].护理研究(上旬版),2012,26(5):1168-1171. 被引量:9
  • 6Kasteleyn MJ, Gorter KJ, van Puffelen AL, et al. What fol- low up care and self-management support do patients with type 2 diabetes want after their first acute coronary event? A qualitative study [J]. Prim CareDiabetes, 2014, 8 (3): 195-206.
  • 7Najafi Ghezeljeh T, Emami A. Strategies for recreating normal life: Iranian coronary heart disease patients perspectives on coping strate- gies [J]. J ClinNurs, 2014, 23 (15-16): 2151-2160.
  • 8Rosvall M, Ostergren PO, Hedblad B, et al. Life-course perspec- tlve on c differences in carotid atherosclerosis [J]. Arte- rioscler Thromb Vase Biol, 2002, 22 (10): 1704-1711.
  • 9朱正炎,沈彬,张红卫,刘燕,牛翠.性别对慢性心力衰竭患者生活质量和社会支持的影响[J].心血管康复医学杂志,2011,20(6):501-504. 被引量:8
  • 10梁景煜,陈芳,裴大军,石宏伟,孙箫音.高血压冠心病患者心理健康水平与社会支持的相关性研究[J].护理学报,2012,19(10):1-4. 被引量:34

二级参考文献44

共引文献81

同被引文献388

引证文献35

二级引证文献238

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部