期刊文献+

中药配合耳压对高血压患者的疗效观察 被引量:4

Observation of Clinical Efficacy in Hypertension with Chinese Medicine and Auricular Application Pressure
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察中药配合耳压对高血压患者的临床疗效。方法:选取210例Ⅰ、Ⅱ级高血压病肝火亢盛证患者,将其随机分为A、B、C 3组,A组:建康教育;B组:健康教育+耳穴贴压;C组:健康教育+耳穴贴压+中药"菊明颗粒"。疗程为8周。观察治疗前后的中医症状和血压变化。结果:症状疗效比较:A组显效7例,有效18例,无效45例,总有效率35.71%;B组显效10例,有效31例,无效29例,总有效率58.57%;C组显效14例,有效38例,无效18例,总有效率74.92%;在改善临床症状的疗效依次为:C组>B组>A组,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。血压疗效比较:A组显效3例,有效29例,无效38例,总有效率45.71%;B组显效7例,有效33例,无效30人例,总有效率57.14%;C组显效9例,有效36例,无效25例,总有效率64.29%;降低血压的疗效依次为:C组>B组>A组,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。SF-36生活质量各维度总积分:C组组内比较,干预前后生理机能(PF)、精神健康(MH)、精力(VT)、一般健康状况(GH)方面均P>0.05,未见统计学差异;生理职能(RP)、情感职能(RE)、躯体疼痛(BP)、社会功能(SF)方面均P<0.05,具有显著统计学差异;B组干预前后情感职能(RE)、躯体疼痛(BP)、社会功能(SF)方面均P<0.05,具有显著统计学差异,生理机能(PF)、生理职能(RP)、精神健康(MH)等方面均P>0.05,未见统计学差异;A组干预前后情感职能(RE)P<0.05,具有显著统计学差异,生理机能(PF)、精神健康(MH)等方面均P>0.05,未见统计学差异。结论:中药配合耳压能明显改善高血压病肝火亢盛证患者的血压、症状,提高生活质量,值得临床广泛应用。 Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine with auricular pressure in hypertensive patients. Methods :210 cases of Ⅰ,Ⅱ stage hyperactivity and liver yang hyperactivity syndrome patients were randomly divided into A, B, C three groups, Group A : health education; group B : health education and auricular acupressure ; group C : health education and auricular pressure and medicine Juming Granule treatment for eight weeks. TCM symptoms and blood pressure changes were observed before and after treatment. Results:Comparison of efficacy symptoms: group A seven cases were cured, effective 18 ca- ses, invalid 45 cases,the total efficiency was 35.72% ;group B effective 10 cases,31 were valid, invalid 29 cases, the total effi- ciency was 58.58% ;group C cured 14 cases,effective 37 cases,invalid 18 cases, the total efficiency was 73.92% ;efficacy in im- proving clinical symptoms was as follows : group C 〉 group B 〉 group A, there was a significant difference ( P 〈 0.05 ). Compari- son of efficacy of blood pressure: A group three cases were cured, effective 29 cases,38 were invalid, the total efficiency was 45. 73% ;group B markedly 7, effective 33 cases ,30 were invalid, the total efficiency was 57.14% ;group C markedly 9 cases, effec- tive 36 cases, ineffective 24 cases, the total efficiency was 65.22% ; reducing blood pressure effect was : group C 〉 Group B 〉 group A, there was a significant difference ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The total score of life quality in all dimensions was Compared :C group, before comprehensive intervention quality of life general integral, physiological function (PF), mental health (MH), energy (VT), gen- eral health status (GH) P 〉 0.05 with no significant difference (RP) ; physiological function, emotional function ( RE ), bodily pain, social function (BP) (SF) were P 〈 0. 05 with significant difference ; B group intervention emotional functions ( RE), bodily pain (BP) ,social function (SF) were P 〈 0. 05 with significant difference (PF) ; physiological function physiological function(RP) ,mental health (MH) were P 〉 0. 05 with no significant difference;A group before and after the intervention emotional functions (RE) P 〈 0. 05 with significant differences, physiological function ( PF), mental health (MH) were P 〉 0. 05 with no significant difference. Conclusion : Medicine with ear pressure can significantly relieve blood pressure, symptoms, quality of life and is worthy of wider application.
出处 《辽宁中医杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第6期1231-1234,共4页 Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金 辽宁省科学技术计划项目(2010225034)
关键词 中药 耳压 高血压 临床疗效 Chinese medicine auricular pressure hypertension clinical efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

共引文献51

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部