期刊文献+

国内两种允许总误差标准在评估临床化学检测项目分析质量及选择质控程序中的应用比较 被引量:7

Application Comparison of Two Source of Allowable Total Errors inσMetrics Assessing the Analytical Quality and Selecting Quality Control Procedures for Automated Clinical Chemistry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估国内行业标准(WS/T 403-2012,临床生物化学检验常规项目分析质量指标)和国家标准(GB/T 20470-2006,临床实验室室间质量评价要求)提供的允许总误差在σ度量评估临床生化检测项目分析质量应用中的差异,用操作过程规范图(OPSpecs 图)来选择适当的质控程序。方法从卫生部临床检验中心2014年2月常规化学室内质控数据及2014年第一次常规化学室间质评中获得某一家实验室21个检测项目的变异系数(CV%)及百分差值(用其估计偏倚大小),利用国内行业标准(WS/T 403-2012)和国家标准(GB/T 20470-2006)提供的允许总误差计算两个批次质控品的σ值。使用临床检验定量测定室内质量控制设计软件(QCCS)绘制21个项目的操作过程规范图(OPSpecs 图),根据该图选择质控程序。结果使用国内行业标准(WS/T 403-2012)得到的σ值在0-7之间。而使用国家标准(GB/T 20470-2006)计算的σ值大多在3-15之间。在标准化方法决定图上,使用国家标准(GB/T 20470-2006)提供的允许总误差评估的试验分析性能普遍比使用国内行业标准(WS/T 403-2012)得到的高至少一个层级。使用国内行业标准(WS/T 403-2012)制定的质控程序明显比在国家标准(GB/T 20470-2006)下制定的质控程序严格。使用国内行业标准制定的质控程序中,多规则检测四次的有:ALB,ALP,Ca,Cl,TC,Crea,Glu,LDH,K,Na,TP,TG 和 Urea;13 s 检测四次的有:Mg;12.5 s 检测两次的有:CK,AMY 和 Fe;13 s 检测两次的有:TBIL;13.5 s 检测两次的有:ALT,AST 和 UA。结论国内行业标准(WS/T 403-2012)提供的允许总误差较国内行业标准(WS/T 403-2012,临床生物化学检验常规项目分析质量指标)严格,临床实验室还需要不断提高其检测质量水平。 Objective To evaluate the difference of two sources of allowable total errors provided by National Health Industry Standard (WS/T 403-2012,analytical quality specification for routine analytes in clinical biochemistry)and National Stand-ard (GB/T 20470-2006,requirements of external quality assessment for clinical laboratories)in assessing the analytical qual-ity byσmetrics,and selecting quality control procedures using operational process specifications graphs.Methods Selected one of the laboratories participating in the internal quality control activity of routine chemistry of February,2014 and the first time external quality assessment activity of routine chemistry in 2014 organized by National Center for Clinical Labora-tories for its coefficient of variation and the bias of nineteen clinical chemistry tests.With the CV% and Bia%,σmetrics of controls at two analyte concentrations were calculated using two different allowable total errors targets (National Health In-dustry Standard (WS/T 403-2012)and National Standard (GB/T 20470-2006).Could obtain a operational process specifica-tions graph by which Could select quality control procedures using the Quality control computer simulat software developed by National Center for Clinical Laboratories and the company zhongchuangyida.Results The σ metrics under National Health Industry Standard (WS/T 403-2012)were from 0 to 7.Most of the values (86% and 76.2%)under National Stand-ard (GB/T 20470-2006)were from 3 to 15.On the normalized method decision chart,the assay quality using the allowable total errors targets of National Standard (GB/T 20470-2006)was at least one hierarchy more than one using National Health Industry Standard (WS/T 403-2012).The quality control rules under National Health Industry Standard (WS/T 〈br〉 403-2012)were obviously more strict than that under National Standard (GB/T 20470-2006).Among the control procedures using National Health Industry Standard (WS/T 403-2012),multirule (n=4):ALB,ALP,Ca,Cl,TC,Crea,Glu,LDH,K, Na,TP,TG and Urea;13s (n=4):Mg;12.5s (n=2):CK,AMY ang Fe;13s (n=2):TBIL;13.5s (n=2):ALT,AST and UA.Conclusion The allowable total errors provided by National Health Industry Standard (WS/T 403-2012)are more stringent than that from National Standard (GB/T 20470-2006).So Laboratories need to improve the analytical quality of their tests furthermore.
出处 《现代检验医学杂志》 CAS 2015年第3期162-165,168,共5页 Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
关键词 允许总误差 质量 σ度量 质控规则 allowable total error quality sigma metrics quality control rules
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Westgard JO. Six :sigma quality design control..de- sirable precision and requisite QC for laboratory measurement proc:esses [M]. Madison, Wh Westgard QC,2000.
  • 2王薇,王治国,李少男.六西格玛在临床实验室的应用[J].中国医疗器械信息,2008,14(12):10-15. 被引量:8
  • 3Chesher D, Burnett L . Equivalence of critical error calculations and process capability index Cpk[J]. Clin Chem,1997,43(!6 Pt 1):1100-1101.
  • 4国家质量监督检验检疫总局.中国国家标准化管理委员会.WS/T403--2012.临床生物化学检验常规项目分析质量指标,第3部分:分析质量指标设定[s].北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
  • 5中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.中国国家标准化管量委员会.GB/T20470-2006.临床实验室室间质量评价要求,第5部分:各专业和亚专业室间质量评价计划的具体要求[s].北京:中国标准出版社,2006.
  • 6中国合格评定国家认可委员会.CNAS-TRL-001.医学实验室-测量不确定度的评定与表达[M].北京:中国计量出版社,2012.

二级参考文献32

  • 1查看详情,2006.
  • 2Kalra J.Medical errors:impact on clinical laboratories and other critical areas[J],2004(12).
  • 3Plebani M.Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine?[J],2006(6).
  • 4Boone DJ.Governmental perspectives on evaluating laboratory performance,1993.
  • 5Westgard JO;Westgard SA.An assessment of s metrics for analytical quality using performance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable performance[J],2006(3).
  • 6Westgard JO;Klee GG.Quality management,2006.
  • 7Daley AT.Pro:lean Six Sigma strategy revolutionizing health care of tomorrow,2006(E2).
  • 8Nevalainen D;Berte L;Kraft C;Leigh E Picaso L Morgan T.Evaluating laboratory performance on quality indicators with the Six sigma strategy scale,2000.
  • 9Westgard JO.Six Sigma quality:performance metrics vs.laboratory myths,2002.
  • 10Westgard JO.Six Sigma strategy:quality design and control,2006.

共引文献7

同被引文献50

引证文献7

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部