期刊文献+

团体心理咨询对手术室护士心理状况的干预效果 被引量:15

Intervention effect of group psychological counseling on mental status of nurses in Operating Room
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:了解手术室护士的心理状况,评价团体心理咨询对手术室护士心理状况的干预效果。方法采取便利抽样的方法抽取某军区的5家军队医院及淮安市2家三级医院,采取整群抽样的方法抽取122名手术室护士,采取调查问卷的方法调查122名手术室护士的心理状况,将32名心理评估阳性者进行为期8次的团体心理咨询,咨询后再次进行问卷调查及比较,同时使用焦虑与抑郁自评量表进行前后评估。结果122名手术室护士SCL-90量表中躯体化、焦虑、抑郁、强迫、人际关系敏感、恐怖因子均分分别为(1.88±0.76),(1.78±0.80),(1.95±0.88),(2.05±0.84),(1.84±0.75),(1.43±0.72)分,均高于中国常模,差异有统计学意义(t值分别为7.41,5.38,5.65,5.65,2.80,3.07;P〈0.05);焦虑量表、抑郁量表得分分别为(46.40±6.53),(51.82±8.87)分,均高于中国常模,差异有统计学意义(t值分别为4.06,12.38;P〈0.05)。参加团体心理咨询的32名手术室护士干预前SCL-90量表中躯体化、焦虑、抑郁、强迫、人际关系敏感评分分别为(2.01±0.87),(1.88±0.75),(2.00±0.98),(2.13±0.94),(1.96±0.79)分,均高于干预后,差异有统计学意义(t值分别为2.56,2.20,2.13,2.20,2.09;P〈0.05);焦虑、抑郁量表得分分别为(45.58±6.47),(42.25±11.24)分,低于干预前的(59.84±7.24),(61.76±6.32)分,差异有统计学意义(t值分别为8.31,8.56;P〈0.01)。结论团体心理咨询可有效改善手术室护士的心理状况。 Objective To understand nurses′ psychological status in Operating Room ( OR ) and evaluate the intervention effect of group psychological counseling on OR nurses. Methods The questionnaire survey was adopted to investigate 122 OR nurses′ mental status in 5 military hospitals and 3 local level three hospitals by chester sampling. A total of 32 nurses in whole, who had positive symptom of psychological assessment, received group psychological counseling 8 times. After consultation, the questionnaires were used again and the comparison was made with 32 people. At the same time, self-rating anxiety scale ( SAS) and self-rating depression scale ( SDS) were used for evaluation. Results To the 122 operating room nurses, the average scores of somatization was (1. 88 ± 0. 76), anxiety (1. 78 ± 0. 80), depression (1. 95 ± 0. 88), obsessive disorder (2. 05 ± 0. 84), interpersonal relationship (1. 84 ± 0. 75) and phobic anxiety (1. 43 ± 0. 72) in the SCL-90 scale higher than those of the Chinese norm. The differences were statistically significant ( t=7. 41, 5. 38,5. 65, 5. 65, 2. 80, 3. 07;P〈0. 05). The scores of SAS scale (46. 40 ± 6. 53) and SDS scale (51. 82 ± 8. 87) were higher than norm in China, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=4. 06, 12. 38;P〈0. 05). To the 32 operating room nurses who attended group psychological counseling, the average scores of somatization (2. 01 ± 0. 87), anxiety (1. 88 ± 0. 75), depression (2. 00 ± 0. 98), obsessive disorder (2. 13 ± 0. 94) and interpersonal relationship ( 1. 96 ± 0. 79 ) in SCL-90 scale before intervention were higher than (1. 54 ± 0. 57), (1. 54 ± 0. 45), (1. 58 ± 0. 53), (1. 72 ± 0. 48) and (1. 50 ± 0. 87) after intervention with statistical significantce (t=2. 56, 2. 20, 2. 13, 2. 20, 2. 09;P〈0. 05). SAS scale (45. 58 ± 6. 47) and SDS scale (42. 25 ± 11. 24) were lower than SAS scale (59. 84 ± 7. 24) and SDS scale (61. 76 ± 6. 32) after intervention, and the difference was statistically significant (t=8. 31, 8. 56;P〈0. 01). Conclusions Group psychological counseling can effectively improve the OR nurses′mental status.
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2015年第15期1752-1756,共5页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基金 准安市科技局立项课题(HAS2012008)
关键词 手术室 护士 团体心理咨询 心理状况 Operating room Nurse Group psychological counseling Mental status
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献137

共引文献293

同被引文献150

引证文献15

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部