期刊文献+

社会价值取向滑块测验中文版的测量学分析 被引量:12

Psychometric Analysis of the SVO Slider Measure in Chinese Cultural Context
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以大学生群体为样本,对社会价值取向滑块测验(The Slider Measure)中文版的心理测量学特征进行分析,并考察大学生社会价值取向分布的一般特点。研究结果发现滑块测验中文版的重测信度为0.76,与三优势测验的聚合效度为0.57;大学生社会价值取向的分布表现为亲社会者最多,个人主义者次之,竞争者最少的模式,且绝大多数亲社会者行为动机为追求双方相对收益最小化的平等取向;社会价值取向的类型分布在性别与是否独生子女维度上表现出较高的同质性与一致性。社会价值取向滑块测验中文版具有较好的信效度,可以作为测量中国大学生社会价值取向的有效工具。 The purposes of this research are to investigate the psychometric properties of the Chinese edition of SVO Slider Measure, and the structure and characteristics of Chinese college students' social value orientation. Psy- chometric analysis showed that the Chinese version of the Slider Measure had good test-retest stability and con- vergent validity. The distribution of observed SVO angles in our sample showed a commonly found distribution, with the majority being classified as prosocial (65.5%) , followed by individualists (31.1%) , and only a few com- petitors (3.1%) . What's more, the distribution of prosocial individual's IA index suggested that prosocial individ- uals were not homogeneous with respect to their more nuanced prosocial preference, and the most people were sensitive to equality between payoffs, whereas others seem to be striving for maximizing joint gain. In addition, further analysis of the data implied that the distributions of SVO were not significantly different between female group and male group, or between one-child group and non-one-child group, indicating that the percentages of pro-socials, individualists, and competitors were indeed very similar in these groups. To conclude, these results suggested that the Chinese edition SVO Slider Measure could provide a reliable and valid measure of college student's SVO in Chinese cultural context.
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期404-409,共6页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 教育部人文社科研究基地重大项目(12JJD190004) 新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-11-1065) 国家自然科学基金(31371045) 中青年骨干创新人才培养计划 天津市教育科学规划项目(CE2003)
关键词 社会价值取向 滑块测验 三优势测量 亲社会 social value orientation, slider measure, triple-dominance scale, prosocial
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献98

  • 1何贵兵.动态两难对策中信息反馈方式对合作行为的影响[J].心理科学,2004,27(4):876-880. 被引量:16
  • 2谢晓非,余媛媛,陈曦,陈晓萍.合作与竞争人格倾向测量[J].心理学报,2006,38(1):116-125. 被引量:73
  • 3刘长江,李岩梅,李纾.实验社会心理学中的社会困境[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(2):379-384. 被引量:35
  • 4Dawes R M. Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 1980, 31:169-193
  • 5Kollock P. Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology; 1998, 24:183-214
  • 6Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons. Science, 1968, 162: 1243-1248
  • 7Miller D T, Ramer R K. The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74:53-62
  • 8Meglino B M, Korsgaard M A. Considering Rational Self- Interest as Disposition: Organizational Implications of Other Orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004, 89:946-959
  • 9Batson C D, Moran T. Empahty-induced altruism in a prisoner's dilemma. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1999, 29: 909-924
  • 10Kelley H H, Stahelski A J. Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 16:66-91

共引文献56

同被引文献75

引证文献12

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部