期刊文献+

SPECT/CT融合显像对可疑骨转移灶的诊断效能 被引量:1

Diagnostic efficacy of SPECT/CT fusion imaging in assessing possible bone metastases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价SPECT/CT融合显像对可疑骨转移灶的诊断效能。方法回顾性分析64例恶性肿瘤患者经全身骨显像发现的96个可疑骨转移病灶,对可疑病灶行同机SPECT/CT融合显像,由两名核医学医师分别对SPECT、CT及SPECT/CT融合显像进行分析并评分,以病理学结果或6个月以上复查影像学及临床随访结果作为最终确诊依据。SPECT/CT融合显像对可疑病灶的诊断效能通过受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)进行评价。结果 SPECT/CT显像诊断可疑骨转移灶的灵敏度、特异度、准确率、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为93.1%、86.8%、90.6%、91.5%和89.2%;ROC曲线下面积:SPECT/CT融合图像为0.956,CT图像为0.897,SPECT图像为0.710。结论 SPECT/CT融合显像较SPECT及CT显像具有较高的诊断效能。 Objective To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography(SPECT/CT) in assessing possible bone metastases. Methods Sixty-four patients with history of primary cancer with 96 lesions that could not be definitively diagnosed using planar scintigraphy were included in this study, and SPECT/CT was performed. SPECT, CT, and SPECT/CT images were independently interpreted and scored by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians. The final diagnosis was confirmed by the pathological results or follow-up (≥6 months ) . The value of additional fused images was assessed using receiver operating characteristic(ROC) analysis. Results The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and negative and positive predictive values for SPECT/CT imaging were 93.1%, 86.8%, 90.6%, 91.5%, and 89.2%, respectively. The areas under the ROC curve were 0.956, 0.897, and 0710 for SPECT/CT-fused images, CT images, and SPECT, respectively. Conclusion SPECT/CT fusion imaging was more accurate and valuable compared with separate sets of SPECT and CT images.
出处 《国际放射医学核医学杂志》 2015年第3期201-204,共4页 International Journal of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine
基金 天津市卫生局科技基金(2013KZl2)
关键词 肿瘤转移 骨骼 体层摄影术 发射型计算机 单光子 体层摄影术 X线计算机 Neoplasm metastasis Skeleton Tomography,emission-computed,single-photon Tomography,X-ray computed
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Palmedo H, Marx C, Ebert A, et al. Whole-body SPECT/CT for bone scintigraphy: diagnostic value and effect on patient management in oncological patients[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2014, 41 (1): 59-67.
  • 2朱广文,张延军,杜雪梅,陶莉,解静慧,胡伟.~99Tc^m-MDP SPECT/CT骨显像诊断恶性肿瘤骨转移的价值[J].中华核医学杂志,2005,25(6):335-336. 被引量:53
  • 3Zhang Y, Shi H, Cheng D, et al. Added value of SPECT/spiral CT versus SPECT in diagnosing solitary spinal lesions in patients with extraskeletal malignancies[J]. Nucl Med Commun, 2013, 34 (5) : 451-458.
  • 4李林,赵祯,郭兴.恶性肿瘤骨转移影像学诊断[J].中华核医学杂志,2006,26(5):315-318. 被引量:57
  • 5董科,石洪成,刘江,张一秋,陈曙光,蔡良.SPECT/CT显像在肿瘤骨转移同一病灶动态随访中的价值[J].中华核医学与分子影像杂志,2013,33(3):199-202. 被引量:25
  • 6杜晓庆,郁春景,万卫星.骨转移瘤影像学早期诊断现状及进展[J].中华核医学杂志,2009,29(6):429-431. 被引量:4
  • 7Zhao Z, Li L, Li F, et al. Single photon emission computed tomogra- phy/spiral computed tomography fusion imaging for the diagnosis of bone metastasis in patients with known cancer[J]. Skeletal Radiol, 2010, 39(2) : 147-153.
  • 8Utsunomiya D, Shiraishi S, Imuta M, et al. Added value of SPECT/ CT fusion in assessing suspected bone metastasis : comparison with scintigraphy alone and nonfused scintigraphy and CT[J]. Radiology, 2006, 238( 1 ) : 264-271.
  • 9Sharma P, Kumar R, Singh H, et al. Indeterminate lesions on planar bone scintigraphy in lung cancer patients: SPECT, CT or SPECT- CT?[J]. Skeletal Radiol, 2012, 41(7) : 843-850.
  • 10International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publi- cation 105. Radiological protection in medicine[J]. Ann ICRP, 2007, 37(6) : 1-63.

二级参考文献61

  • 1朱广文,张延军,杜雪梅,陶莉,解静慧,胡伟.~99Tc^m-MDP SPECT/CT骨显像诊断恶性肿瘤骨转移的价值[J].中华核医学杂志,2005,25(6):335-336. 被引量:53
  • 2李彦生,王俊起,刘磊,高硕.^(18)F—NaF的合成及其在肺癌骨转移中的临床应用[J].中华核医学杂志,2006,26(1):18-20. 被引量:8
  • 3岳明纲,王茜,秦淑玲,张彩群,聂玉新,王玉,梁铁军.骨断层显像与同机定位CT进行图像融合对诊断脊柱骨转移性病变的临床应用价值[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2006,17(4):202-204. 被引量:17
  • 4Traill Z, Richards MA, Moore NR. Magnetic resonance imaging of metastatic bone disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1995, 312: 76- 78.
  • 5Hamaoka T, Madewell JE, Podoloff DA, et al. Bone imaging in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2004, 22 : 2942-2953.
  • 6Eustace S, Tello R, DeCarvalho V, et al. A comparison of wholebody turboSTIR MR imaging and planar ^99Tc^m-methylene diphosphonatc scintigraphy in the examination of patients with suspected skeletal metastases. Am J Roentgenol, 1997, 169: 1655-1661.
  • 7Lauenstein TC, Freudenberg LS, Goehde SC, et al. Whole-body MRI using a rolling table platform for the detection of bone metastases. Eur Radiol, 2002, 12: 2091-2099.
  • 8Frat A, Agldere M, Gencoglu A, et al. Value of whole-body turbo short tau inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging with panoramic table for detecting bone metastases: comparison with ^99Tc^m- methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2006, 30: 151-156.
  • 9Ghanem N, Altehoefer C, Kelly T, et al. Whole-body MRI in comparison to skeletal scintigraphy in detection of skeletal metastases in patients with solid tumors. In Vivo, 2006, 20: 173-182.
  • 10Ohno Y, Koyama H, Nogami M, et al. Whole-body MR imaging vs. FDG-PET : comparison of accuracy of M-stage diagnosis for lung cancer patients. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2007, 26: 498-509.

共引文献125

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部