摘要
目的分析痔疮手术使用骶管阻滞以及硬膜外腔阻滞进行麻醉的临床效果,对这两种麻醉方式进行对比分析。方法 2010∽2012年我院有59例痔疮手术患者接受治疗,将这些患者随机分组为A1、A2两组,A1组30例患者使用骶管阻滞麻醉,A2组29例患者使用硬膜外腔阻滞麻醉,对两组的临床麻醉情况进行对比分析。结果麻醉治疗后,A1比A2组患者起效时间短,两组患者的麻醉评分结果无统计学差异,P〉0.05。A1组比A2组的运动评分低,P〈0.05。结论痔疮手术使用骶管阻滞麻醉的效果优秀,临床生效时间快。
Objective To study and compare the clinical effect between caudal block and epidural anesthesia in hemorrhoid surgery. Methods 59 patients with hemorrhoids surgery from 2010 to 2012 in our hospital were selected into A1 and A2 groups randomly, 30 patients in A1 group received caudal anesthesia, 29 patients in A2 group received epidural cavity anesthesia, clinical anesthesia effects between two groups were compared. Results After anesthesia treatment, the onset time in A1 group was shorter than A2 group, the anesthesia score between two groups was not statistically difference, P〈0.05. The motor score in A1 group was lower than A2 group, P〈0.05. Conclusion The effect of caudal anesthesia in Hemorrhoid surgery is better, with shorter onset time, it can be widely used.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2015年第16期165-166,共2页
China Health Standard Management
