期刊文献+

保留肾单位手术治疗T_(1b)期肾细胞癌 被引量:4

Nephron sparing surgery for treatment of T_(1b) renal cell carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨保留肾单位手术(NSS)治疗T1b期肾细胞癌的可行性。方法:对2005年1月~2009年10月NSS治疗30例T1b期肾细胞癌患者的临床料进行回顾性分析,并与同期60例采用根治性肾切除术(RN)病例进行比较,对比两组病例的围手术期和术后随访资料。结果:30例NSS术均顺利完成。动脉阻断时间15~32(中位24)min;术中出血量40~110(中位60)ml;术后并发症发生率20%;与同期行RN术病例比较,在术后肾功能改变上,NSS显著优于RN(15.3±9.7)ml/(min·1.73m^2)vs(25.0±10.6)ml/(min·1.73m^2),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);而在5年总生存率、肿瘤特异性生存率和无远处转移生存率上差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论:NSS是一种安全有效的治疗T1b期肾细胞癌的手术方法。 Objective:To evaluate the clincal effects and oncologic outcomes of nephron sparing surgery(NSS)for treatment of T1 brenal cell carcinoma.Method:Clinical data of 30 patients with T1bN0M0 RCC from January2005 to October 2009 were retrospectively analyzed,and compared with the outcomes of another 60 patients undergoing radical nephrectomy(RN).Result:All surgeries were successfully taken.The results were as followed:median time of cold ischemia was 24(range,15-32)min;median blood loss was 60(range,40-110)ml;the incidence of postoperative complication was 20%.The postoperative change in estimated glomerular filtration rate one year after surgery was higher in the RN group than in the NSS group(25.0±10.6)ml/(min·1.73 m^2)vs(15.3±9.7)ml/(min·1.73m^2),P〈0.01.However,there was no diffience in 5-year overall survival(OS),cancer-specific survival(CSS),and distant metastasis-free survival(DMFS)between NSS and RN groups.Conclusion:NSS is a safe and effective treatment for patients with T1 b RCC.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2015年第6期481-484,共4页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 肾细胞癌 肾肿瘤 保留肾单位手术 根治性肾切除术 肾功能 renal cell carcinoma renal tumor nephron sparing surgery radical nephrectomy renal function
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Nam J K,Cha C S,Chung M K.The treatment outcomes of a partial nephrectomy in the management of renal cell carcinomas[J].Korean J Urol,2004,45:1100-1105.
  • 2Clark P E,Schover L R,Uzzo R G,et al.Quality of life and psychological adaptation after surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma:impact of the amount of remaining renal tissue[J].Urology,2001,57(2):252-256.
  • 3Lau W K,Blute M L,Weaver A L,et al.Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney[J].Mayo Clin Proc,2000,75(12):1236-1242.
  • 4Meskawi M,Becker A,Bianchi M,et al.Partial and radical nephrectomy provide comparable long-term cancer control for T1brenal cell carcinoma[J].Int J Urol,2014,21(2):122-128.
  • 5Russo P,Huang W.The medical and oncological rationale for partial nephrectomy for the treatment of T1renal cortical tumors[J].Urol Clin North Am,2008,35(4):635-643.
  • 6Go A S,Chertow G M,Fan D,et al.Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death,cardiovascular events,and hospitalization[J].N Engl J Med,2004,351(13):1296-1305.
  • 7Huang W C,Levey A S,Serio A M,et al.Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours:a retrospective cohort study[J].Lancet Oncol,2006,7(9):735-740.
  • 8Leibovich B C,Blute M,Cheville J C,et al.Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4and 7cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy[J].J Urol,2004,171(3):1066-1070.
  • 9Milonas D,Skulˇcius G,Baltrimaviˇcius R,et al.Comparison of long-term results after nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy in treating 4-to 7-cm renal cell carcinoma[J].Medicina,2013,49(5):223-228.
  • 10Badalato G M,Kates M,Wisnivesky J P,et al.Survival after partial and radical nephrectomy for the treatment of stage T1bN0M0renal cell carcinoma(RCC)in the USA:apropensity scoring approach[J].BJU Int,2012,109(10):1457-1462.

同被引文献16

引证文献4

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部