期刊文献+

我国科技金融对科技创新的影响研究——基于面板模型的分析 被引量:161

Research on the Impact of Science-finance on Technological Innovation Based on Panel Data Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于2003—2013年的29个省(除西藏、新疆)的面板数据,运用面板模型分析科技金融对科技创新的影响。将科技创新分为3个阶段,而且将科技金融分为公共科技金融和市场科技金融,同时把全国29个省分为东、中、西部分别进行分析。结果表明:在技术创新阶段,科技型上市公司占比和风险投资对专利授权数有着促进作用,但是政府投入经费比对专利授权数有着抑制作用。在技术成果转化阶段,不同的地区有不同的结果,大部分情况下,科技金融对科技创新没有显著地影响。在高新技术产业化阶段,市场性科技金融对科技创新有着促进作用,但是政府科技资金投入比对科技创新没有显著的影响。不同区域,不同阶段,科技金融对科技创新都有着不同的作用。 Based on 2003 -2013 panel data of 29 provinces (except Tibet, Xinjiang), we applied panel data model to analysis the impact of Science-finance on technological innovation. In this article, technological innovation was divided into three phases and Science-finance into public and market Science-finance. Then 29 provinces were analyzed separately as eastern, central and western. The results showed that : in technological innovation stage, the ratio of listed science and technology companies and the number of venture capital institutions has promoted to the number of patents, but the government investment funds inhibit the number of patents. In the transformation stage of technological achievements,different regions have different results, and Science-finance in most areas has no significant impact on technological innovation. In the high-tech industrialization phase, the ratio of listed technological companies and the number of venture capital institutions has a positive effect on the technological innovation, while government funds for science and technology investment have no impact on technological innovation. In different stage and area, Sci-finance has different effect on technological innovation.
作者 芦锋 韩尚容
出处 《中国软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期139-147,共9页 China Soft Science
基金 山西财经大学青年科研基金项目(QN-2014012)
关键词 面板模型 科技创新的三阶段 公共科技金融 panel model three phases of technological innovation public Science-finance
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1熊彼特.经济发展理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1990..
  • 2ALEXANDRA Guarnieri, LIU Pei. To what extent do financing constraints affect Chinese finns' innovation activities [J]. International Review of Financial Analysis 2014 ( 36 ) : 223-240.
  • 3HUS Po-Susan, TAN Xian, AU An. Finance development and innovation: Cross-country evidence [J]. Journal of Financial Economics ,2014 ( 112 ) : 116-135.
  • 4CHANG Wei, DIN Yugo, WANG Japing. Hellenization of venture capital and green innovation of Chinese entity industry [J]. Ecological Indicators ,2014( 51 ) :31-41.
  • 5MURIEL Cal-Cont Grandness, SOPHIE Pommet. Venture capital syndication and the financing of innovation:Financial expertise motives [J]. Economics Letters, 2010 ( 106 ) : 75-77.
  • 6GARY Kitakyushu, MICHAEL J Len ox. When do incum- bents learn from entrepreneurial ventures? Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates [J]. Research Policy, 2005 ( 34 ) : 615- 639.
  • 7BASH Siddhartha, DIJON Glucose P J, SUSPENDER Kramer. Financing constraints and investments in R&D: Evidence from Indian Manufacturing firms [J]. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance,2014(55) :28-39.
  • 8BARBARA Weber, CHARACTERISTIC Weber. Corporate venture capital as a means of radical innovation : Relational fit, social capital, and knowledge transfer [J]. Eng. Techno. Manage. ,2007 (24) : 11-35.
  • 9HUS Po-Susan, WANG Chang, WU Challenge. Banking systems, innovations, intellectual property protections, and fin- ancial markets : Evidence from China [J]. Journal of Business Research,2013 (66) :2390-2396.
  • 10胡援成,吴江涛.科技金融的运行机制及金融创新探讨[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(23):10-13. 被引量:46

二级参考文献75

共引文献1167

同被引文献1597

引证文献161

二级引证文献1379

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部