摘要
在统计分析了17家期刊的发文院校倾向、作者倾向、省域倾向、研究范式倾向和研究领域倾向后,进一步以作者的专业背景和论文的研究范式为指标,对17家核心期刊进行聚类分析,将17家高等教育研究期刊归为四大类:非专业化-实践经验性期刊、多元化-实践理论性期刊、专业化-实践理论性期刊和专业化-学术理论性期刊。四类期刊的并存表明,中国当前的高等教育研究确实存在整合与分化两种张力,但两种张力都不具备单方面的优势,绝大多数期刊表现出统合两种张力的倾向。两种张力的相互依托、相互交融汇成了当前中国高等教育研究的主流。
After showing the issued tendency of 17 Chinese core journals in colleges, authors, provices, research fields and research paradigm, a cluster analysis is made based on two indicators, i.e. the authors＇ professional background and papers＇ research paradigm. As a result, four types of journals are found. They are non-professional-experience journals, diversity-theory of practice journals, professional-theory of practice journals and professional-academic theory journals. The coexistence of these four types of journals show that the two tensions of integration and differentiation do affect the higher education research in China, but neither of them possesses an absolute advantage. The vast majority of 17 journals show a tendency to integrate these two tensions. The mainstream of current higher education study in China is the combination of theoretical research and practical research.
出处
《中国高教研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第7期17-24,共8页
China Higher Education Research
基金
中国高等教育学会"十二五"教育科学研究规划课题"2014年全国高校高等教育科研论文系列统计分析"(课题编号:2015ZXB001)的研究成果
关键词
高等教育
核心期刊
研究现状
发文倾向
聚类分析
higher education
core journals
research situation
issued tendency
cluster analysis
