期刊文献+

不同眶内植入物应用于眼窝重建的临床对比研究 被引量:1

A clinical comparison study on different orbital implants in orbital reconstruction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨对羟基磷灰石材料(hydroxyapatite,HA)义眼台(HA义眼台)和高密度多孔聚乙烯材料(porous highdensity polyethylene,PHDPE)义眼台(Medpor义眼台)应用于眼眶填充手术的效果及术后并发症。方法眼球萎缩患者45例45眼,根据患者自身经济状况选择植入材料,其中植入HA义眼台者21例21眼,植入Medpor义眼台者24例24眼,观察两组患者术后效果及并发症。结果 45例患者45眼术后外观均满意。眼活动度评估两组差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),但Medpor义眼台手术后早期结膜水肿发生率及水肿消退时间大于HA义眼台,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。随访6~21月,均未出现义眼台暴露等并发症。结论 Medpor义眼台与HA义眼台植入在远期眼眶的外观改善、义眼运动度等方面均达到满意的临床效果,但是在手术后早期,需要密切随访观察Medpor义眼台植入后的结膜水肿情况。 Objective To compare the surgical effects and complications of hydroxyapatite(HA) with porous high-density polyethylene(PHDPE)(Medpor) as orbital implants in orbital reconstruction.Methods For 45 patients(45 eyes) with eyeball atrophy,orbital implants were selected according to patient economic status,in which 21 cases(21 eyes) were implanted with HA and 24cases(24 eyes) with Medpor.The post-operative efficacy and complications were compared between the two groups.Results Satisfactory appearance can be reached in all patients after operation.There was no significant difference in eye activity assessment between the two groups(P〉0.05).However,there was a significant difference in early conjunctival edema between the two groups(P〈0.05).There were no complications such as exposure of artificial eye mount after 6 ~ 21 months of follow-up in the both groups.Conclusion This preliminary study has demonstrated that the early complications in the Medpor orbital implant surgeries is more seriously than that in HA orbital implant surgeries.It should pay more attentions to avoid the situation.
出处 《实用医院临床杂志》 2015年第4期42-44,共3页 Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine
关键词 眶内植入物 羟基磷灰石 高密度多孔聚乙烯 眼窝重建 Orbital implant Hydroxyapatite Porous high-density polyethylene Orbital reanstruction
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1陈力,黎静,樊映川,曲超,彭洁.眼球摘除术后下穹窿狭窄改良成形术的手术策略[J].实用医院临床杂志,2010,7(6):78-80. 被引量:2
  • 2Lee V, Subak-Sharpe I, Hungerford JL, et al. Exposure of primary or- bital implants in postenucleation retinoblastoma patients [ J ]. Oph- thalmology,2000,107 ( 5 ) : 940-945.
  • 3Sagoo MS, Olver JM. Autogenous temporalis fascia patch graft for porous polyethylene (Medpor) sphere orbital implant exposure[ J]. Br J Ophthalmo1,2004,88 ( 7 ) .942-946.
  • 4Jordan DR. Problems after evisceration surgery with porous orbital implants: experience with 86 patients [ J ]. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg,2004,20(5 ) :374-380.
  • 5Choi YJ, Park C, Jin HC, et al. Outcome of smooth surface tunnel porous polyethylene orbital implants ( Medpor SST) in children with retinoblastoma[ J]. Br J Ophthalmo1,2013,97(12) : 1530-1533.
  • 6Araf D, Assae OM, Brito RV, et al. Miscellaneous orbital implant for anophthalmic cavity reconstruction surgery : case report [ J ]. Arq Bras Oftalmo1,2010,73 ( 1 ) :81-83.
  • 7Kim KH, Lee H, Park M, et alE. Evisceration with four anterior rela- xing incisions and circumferential posterior sclerotomies with porous polyethylene orbital implants:an 8-year study [ J ]. Aeta Ophthalmol, 2011,89(7) :686-690.
  • 8Naik MN, Murthy RK, Honavar SG. Comparison of vaseularization of Medpor and Medpor-Plus orbital implants: a prospective, randomized study [ J ]. Ophthal Plast Reeonstr Surg,2007,23 ( 6 ) :463-467.
  • 9Son J, Kim CS, Yang J. Comparison of experimental porous silicone implants and porous polyethylene implants [ J ]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol,2012,250(6) :879-885.
  • 10Huang D, Yu Y, Lu R, et al. A modified evisceration technique with scleral quadrisection and porous polyethylene implantation [ J ]. Am J Ophthalmo1,2009,147 ( 5 ) :924-928.

二级参考文献6

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部