期刊文献+

Influences of Catch Crop and Its Incorporation Time on Soil Carbon and Carbon-Related Enzymes

Influences of Catch Crop and Its Incorporation Time on Soil Carbon and Carbon-Related Enzymes
原文传递
导出
摘要 Catch crops that are cultivated for green manure play an important role in improving soil properties. A 3-year field experi- ment was conducted to investigate the effect of catch crop (pea, Pisum sativum L.) management, i.e., incorporation of catch crop in October/November (autumn) and March (spring), and without catch crop (control), on soil organic carbon (SOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and the activities of carbon (C)-cycle enzymes, including cellulase (Cel), β-glucosidase (Glu) and invertase (Inv). Additionally, soil total nitrogen (TN) and pHKcl were investigated. The catch crop was cultivated from August to October each year during 2008-2010. Soil samples were collected from the field of spring barley (Hordeum vulgate L.) that had been grown after the catch crop. Soil samples for microbial activity determination were taken in March, May, June and August in 2009, 2010 and 2011, while SOC and TN contents as well as pHKc1 were determined in March and August. The chemical properties studied did not show significant changes as influenced by the experimental factors. The use of catch crop significantly increased the MBC content and the activities of C-cycle enzymes compared to the control. When the catch crop was incorporated in spring, a significantly higher MBC content was noted in March and May compared to autumn incorporation. Moreover, the spring incorporation of the catch crop significantly increased the Glu activity (except March), while the activities of Cel and Inv as well as the rate of soil basal respiration were usually unaffected by the time of catch crop incorporation. Greater microbial biomass and higher enzyme activities in the catch crop-treated soil, compared to the control, indicated that the application of the catch crop as a green manure could be recommended as a promising technique to increase the biological activity of the soil. Since there was no significant effect or no consistent results were obtained related to the time of catch crop incorporation, both spring and autumn applications can be recommended as a management tool to improve the status of soil properties during the growth of a subsequent crop. Catch crops that are cultivated for green manure play an important role in improving soil properties. A 3-year field experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of catch crop(pea, Pisum sativum L.) management, i.e., incorporation of catch crop in October/November(autumn) and March(spring), and without catch crop(control), on soil organic carbon(SOC), microbial biomass carbon(MBC) and the activities of carbon(C)-cycle enzymes, including cellulase(Cel), β-glucosidase(Glu) and invertase(Inv). Additionally, soil total nitrogen(TN) and p HKClwere investigated. The catch crop was cultivated from August to October each year during 2008–2010. Soil samples were collected from the field of spring barley(Hordeum vulgare L.) that had been grown after the catch crop. Soil samples for microbial activity determination were taken in March, May, June and August in 2009, 2010 and2011, while SOC and TN contents as well as p HKClwere determined in March and August. The chemical properties studied did not show significant changes as influenced by the experimental factors. The use of catch crop significantly increased the MBC content and the activities of C-cycle enzymes compared to the control. When the catch crop was incorporated in spring, a significantly higher MBC content was noted in March and May compared to autumn incorporation. Moreover, the spring incorporation of the catch crop significantly increased the Glu activity(except March), while the activities of Cel and Inv as well as the rate of soil basal respiration were usually unaffected by the time of catch crop incorporation. Greater microbial biomass and higher enzyme activities in the catch crop-treated soil, compared to the control, indicated that the application of the catch crop as a green manure could be recommended as a promising technique to increase the biological activity of the soil. Since there was no significant effect or no consistent results were obtained related to the time of catch crop incorporation, both spring and autumn applications can be recommended as a management tool to improve the status of soil properties during the growth of a subsequent crop.
出处 《Pedosphere》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2015年第4期569-579,共11页 土壤圈(英文版)
关键词 CELLULASE Β-GLUCOSIDASE INVERTASE microbial biomass carbon soil basal respiration 还田时间 土壤碳 农作物 相关酶 掺入 生物活性测定 作物生长过程 微生物生物量碳
  • 相关文献

参考文献53

  • 1Ananyeva N D, Demkina T S, Jones W J, Cabrera M L, Steen W C. 1999. Microbial biomass in soils of Russia under long-term management practices. Biol Fert Soils. 29: 291-299.
  • 2Anderson T H. 2003. Microbial eco-physiological indicators to asses soil quality. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 98: 285-293.
  • 3Anderson T H, Domsch K H. 1989. Ratios of microbial biomass carbon to total organic carbon in arable soils. Soil Biol Bio- chem. 21: 471-479.
  • 4Anderson T H, Domsch K H. 1990. Application of eco-physio- logical quotients (qCO2 and qD) on microbial biomasses from soils of different cropping histories. Soil Biol Biochem. 22: 251-255.
  • 5Arlauskiene A, Maiksteniene S. 2010. The effect of cover crop and straw applied for manuring on spring barley yield and agrochemieal soil properties. Zemdirbyste-Agric. 97: 61-72.
  • 6Bell C W, Acosta-Martinez V, Mclntyre N E, Cox S, Tissue D T, Zak J C. 2009. Linking microbial community structure and function to seasonal differences in soil moisture and tempe- rature in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. Microbial Ecol. 58: 827-842.
  • 7Berntsen J, Olesen J E, Petersen B M, Hansen E M. 2006. Long- term fate of nitrogen uptake in catch crops. Eur J Agron. 25: 383-390.
  • 8Bremner J M, Mulvaney C S. 1982. Nitrogen-total. In Page A L, Miller R H, Keeny D R (eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2rid Edi- tion. ASA, SSSA, Madison. pp. 595-624.
  • 9Chen C R, Xu Z H, Blumfield T J, Hughes J M. 2003. Soil mi- crobial biorass during the early establishment of hoop pine plantation: seasonal variation and impacts of site prepara- tion. Forest Ecol Manag. 186: 213-225.
  • 10Chirinda N, Olesen J E, Porter J R, Schjonning P. 2010. Soil properties, crop production and greenhouse gas emissions from organic and inorganic fertilizer-based arable cropping systems. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 139: 584-594.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部