摘要
国际体育仲裁理事会(ICAS)为2014年仁川亚运会设立的CAS特别仲裁机构,对待管辖权问题的态度比以往大型国际赛事的特别仲裁机构更为严苛:仅受理有正式参赛资格的运动员、发生于亚运会举办期间和举办国的争议。这种做法可能侵犯运动员的诉权,同时,可能违背特别仲裁机构设立的初衷。通过比较奥运会、英联邦运动会和世界杯的特别仲裁规则与仲裁实践,认为特别仲裁机构的管辖范围不应过于狭窄,仲裁规则在制定和适用中应保障运动员的诉权,对存在有效仲裁协议的主体不应当进行限制,对争议产生时间应当采取客观标准,排除对商事争议和体育技术性争议的管辖,维护最广大运动员的基本权益。我国应尽快在全运会等大型赛事中设立特别仲裁机制,吸取亚运会等国际赛事的经验教训,特别仲裁管辖范围不应过于严苛,以求更好地解决与赛事相关的体育争议。
International Council of Arbitration for Sport（ICAS）established Court of Arbitration for Sport （CAS）Ad Hoc Division for 17 th Asian Games in Incheon of Korea, which has a more strict attitude towards jurisdiction by comparison with other international sports events CAS Ad hoc Division. The Incheon Asian Games CAS Ad Hoc Division only accepts participating athletes＇ disputes arising in the host country between 15 September 2014 and 4 October 2014. Those rules may violate the athletes＇ right of action and run counter to the purpose of the Ad Hoc Division. Comparing with other international sports events Ad hoc Divisions, it can get the conclusion that the jurisdiction of CAS Ad Hoc Division should not be too strict ; Rules of arbitration should respect the principle of protecting the athletes＇ right of action ;The limitation of actions should use the objective standard; The panel should deny its jurisdiction to commercial and pure technical disputes;The Ad Hoc Division should provide remedies to all athletes. China should establish Ad Hoc Division in National Games as soon as possible, and the jurisdiction of the Ad Hoc Division should not be too strict according to the experience of CAS Ad Hoc Division in Asian Games and other international games, and it can be expected a better settlement of sports disputes arisen in China＇s national competitions.
出处
《中国体育科技》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第4期97-103,共7页
China Sport Science and Technology
基金
国家社会科学基金资助项目(11CFX076)
